Optimal use of biomass in large-scale energy systems: Insights for energy policy

Biomass chemical conversion processes allow the production of solid, liquid and gaseous biofuels, which can substitute almost any kind of fossil fuel and the associated greenhouse gas emissions. Despite this potential, high investment costs and conversion losses reaching up to 30-40 % of the input biomass energy content are major barriers to a higher penetration rate of the chemical conversion processes. Thus, biomass is nowadays predominantly used in direct combustion processes. However, conversion losses of chemical processes may be compensated by the fact that biofuels can be used in more efficient technologies for supplying energy services compared to standard raw biomass fuelled technologies. As an example, Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) can be used in a cogeneration-heat pump system to produce heat, reaching an overall efficiency much higher compared to a wood boiler. In this work biomass conversion options are compared taking into account the complete energy conversion pathway, from the resource to the supply of energy services. The comparison is performed by evaluating the CO2 abatement potential of integrating these different pathways into a national energy system with a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) modelling approach. The comparison is done with 56 scenarios, which are classified in two different groups. Scenarios belonging to the first group consider the choice of the biomass chemical conversion process as the only possible change in the system. In the second group, other changes are allowed in the energy system, such as an important deployment of efficient technologies. Results show that biofuels can allow for an overall better performance in terms of avoided CO2 emissions compared to direct combustion. This potential, however, depends on a wider deployment of efficient end-use technologies.

[1]  Mobolaji Shemfe,et al.  Techno-economic performance analysis of biofuel production and miniature electric power generation from biomass fast pyrolysis and bio-oil upgrading , 2015 .

[2]  Stefano Moret,et al.  Geothermal Energy and Biomass Integration in Urban Systems: a Case Study , 2015 .

[3]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Characterization of input uncertainties in strategic energy planning models , 2017 .

[4]  Michel Bierlaire,et al.  Strategic Energy Planning under Uncertainty: a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming Modeling Framework for Large-Scale Energy Systems , 2016 .

[5]  D. Walker,et al.  Biofuels, facts, fantasy, and feasibility , 2009, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[6]  C. Ludwig,et al.  Life cycle assessment of SNG from wood for heating, electricity, and transportation , 2011 .

[7]  Raffaele Bolliger Méthodologie de la synthèse des systèmes énergétiques industriels , 2010 .

[8]  Stefano Moret,et al.  Integration of deep geothermal energy and woody biomass conversion pathways in urban systems , 2016 .

[9]  Rainer Zah,et al.  Heat, electricity, or transportation? The optimal use of residual and waste biomass in Europe from an environmental perspective. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  François Maréchal,et al.  Thermo-economic optimisation of the integration of electrolysis in synthetic natural gas production from wood , 2008 .

[11]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming , 1993 .

[12]  Adriano V. Ensinas,et al.  Thermo-economic optimization of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell – Gas turbine system fuelled with gasified lignocellulosic biomass , 2014 .

[13]  Stefano Moret,et al.  Strategic energy planning for large-scale energy systems: A modelling framework to aid decision-making , 2015 .

[14]  Danièle Revel,et al.  IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation , 2011 .

[15]  Fabio Menten,et al.  Lessons from the use of a long-term energy model for consequential life cycle assessment: The BTL case , 2015 .

[16]  François Maréchal,et al.  A systematic methodology for the environomic design and synthesis of energy systems combining process integration, Life Cycle Assessment and industrial ecology , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[17]  Jinyue Yan,et al.  Increasing biomass utilisation in energy systems: a comparative study of CO2 reduction and cost for different bioenergy processing options. , 2004 .

[18]  Martin Kautz,et al.  The externally-fired gas-turbine (EFGT-Cycle) for decentralized use of biomass , 2007 .

[19]  D. Favrat,et al.  Innovative Hybrid Cycle Solid Oxide Fuel Cell‐Inverted Gas Turbine with CO2 Separation , 2011 .

[20]  Ramchandra Bhandari,et al.  Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis – a review , 2014 .