Bicycle-Specific Traffic Signals: Results from State-of-the-Practice Review

This paper presents the results of a survey of North American jurisdictions with known installations of bicycle-specific traffic signals and a review of available engineering guidance. Surveys were sent to agencies in 21 jurisdictions (19 in the United States and two in Canada) that requested detailed engineering aspects of the signal design such as placement, mounting height, lens diameter, backplate color, type of actuation, interval times, use of louvers, and performance. We reviewed guidance documents produced by the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO); American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO); Transportation Association of Canada (TAC); the CROW design manual for bicycle traffic; and the Canadian, U.S. and Californian manuals on uniform traffic control devices. Responses were received for 63 intersections and 149 separate signal heads. The survey results highlight the current treatments and variations of similar designs. A subsequent review of the documents generally revealed consistent guidance with regard to the design of bicycle-specific traffic signals. The guidance on bicycle signals has grown substantially in recent years, and it is likely that there will be less variety in future designs.

[1]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  What is at the end of the road? Understanding discontinuities of on-street bicycle lanes in urban settings , 2005 .

[2]  法律 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices , 2010 .

[3]  Charles Zegeer,et al.  Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility in Europe , 2013 .

[4]  Christopher M. Monsere,et al.  Operational Guidance For Bicycle-SpecificTraffic Signals in the United States: A Review , 2012 .

[5]  Philip J. Stolarski,et al.  Fracture critical inspection team of the State of California Department of Transportation , 1995, Smart Structures.

[6]  Christopher M. Monsere,et al.  Operational Guidance For Bicycle-Specific Traffic Signals In the United States , 2012 .

[7]  Peter G. Furth,et al.  Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity , 2012 .

[8]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[9]  Christopher M. Monsere,et al.  Methodology for Estimating Bicyclist Acceleration and Speed Distributions at Intersections , 2013 .

[10]  Rik de Groot,et al.  Design manual for bicycle traffic , 2007 .

[11]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Four Types of Cyclists? , 2013 .

[12]  Jennifer Dill Bicycling for Transportation and Health: The Role of Infrastructure , 2009, Journal of public health policy.

[13]  M. Fleming,et al.  Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. Performance Maximization of Actively Managed Funds , 2005 .

[14]  John Pucher,et al.  Making Walking and Cycling Safer: Lessons from Europe , 2000 .

[15]  G Noxon,et al.  Traffic Signal Guidelines for Bicycles , 2014 .