Assessing the credibility of a series of computational fluid dynamic simulations of open channel flow

Recent developments in numerical algorithms have enabled the construction of three-dimensional models for the prediction of flows in open channels. These advances encompass improvements in both numerical solutions and the process representation required for an accurate system definition. However, to date, there is still little agreement on how to assess systematically and report the credibility of these simulations. This paper addresses this problem by adopting a Grid Convergence Index approach. The results indicate, for two simple hypothetical cases, a zero-degree confluence and a meander bend, that the numerical code can be verified to an acceptable numerical standard. However, it is shown that this does not mean that verification is complete, as the literature implies, as whilst the discretization resolution may be sufficient to verify one of the model variables it does not imply that every variable has converged. Furthermore, the scheme may still be insufficient to capture all the processes of interest that are operating within the chosen environment.

[1]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Secondary circulation cells in river channel confluences: measurement artefacts or coherent flow structures? , 2000 .

[2]  A. Roy,et al.  Mixing-layer distortion at the confluence of channels of different depth , 1991, Nature.

[3]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[4]  Daniel C. Haworth,et al.  A global approach to error estimation and physical diagnostics in multidimensional computational fluid dynamics , 1993 .

[5]  Paul D. Bates,et al.  The importance of spatial resolution in hydraulic models for floodplain environments , 1999 .

[6]  B. P. Leonard.  Order of accuracy of QUICK and related convection-diffusion schemes , 1995 .

[7]  Robert I. Ferguson,et al.  Numerical modelling of separated flow in river bends: model testing and experimental investigation of geometric controls on the extent of flow separation at the concave bank , 1998 .

[8]  P. Roache.  Perspective: A Method for Uniform Reporting of Grid Refinement Studies , 1994 .

[9]  Silveira Neto A,et al.  Large-eddy simulation of the turbulent flow in the downstream region of a backward-facing step. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[10]  U. Mehta.  Credible Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations , 1998 .

[11]  P. Roache.  Verification of Codes and Calculations , 1998 .

[12]  P. Roache.  QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1997 .

[13]  D. Spalding,et al.  A calculation procedure for heat, mass and momentum transfer in three-dimensional parabolic flows , 1972 .

[14]  K. Richards,et al.  Numerical simulation of three‐dimensional, time‐averaged flow structure at river channel confluences , 2000 .

[15]  Stuart N. Lane,et al.  Investigation of controls on secondary circulation in a simple confluence geometry using a three-dimensional numerical model , 1998 .

[16]  J. Smagorinsky,et al.  GENERAL CIRCULATION EXPERIMENTS WITH THE PRIMITIVE EQUATIONS , 1963 .

[17]  K. Richards,et al.  The application of computational fluid dynamics to natural river channels: three-dimensional versus two-dimensional approaches , 1999 .

[18]  Keith Beven,et al.  Using CFD in a GLUE framework to model the flow and dispersion characteristics of a natural fluvial dead zone , 2001 .

[19]  R. Ferguson,et al.  Slope-induced changes in channel character along a gravel-bed stream: the Allt Dubhaig, Scotland , 1991 .