Independent effects of attentional gain control and competitive interactions on visual stimulus processing.

Attention filters behaviorally relevant stimuli from the constant stream of sensory information comprising our environment. Research into underlying neural mechanisms in humans suggests that visual attention biases mutual suppression between stimuli resulting from competition for limited processing resources. As a consequence, processing of an attended stimulus is facilitated. This account makes 2 assumptions: 1) An attended stimulus is released from mutual suppression with competing stimuli and 2) an attended stimulus experiences greater gain in the presence of competing stimuli than when it is presented alone. Here, we tested these assumptions by recording frequency-tagged potentials elicited in early visual cortex that index stimulus-specific processing. We contrasted the processing of a given stimulus when its location was attended or unattended and in the presence or the absence of a nearby competing stimulus. At variance with previous findings, competition similarly suppressed processing of attended and unattended stimuli. Moreover, the magnitude of attentional gain was comparable in the presence or the absence of competing stimuli. We conclude that visuospatial selective attention does not directly modulate mutual suppression between stimuli but instead acts as a signal gain, which biases processing toward attended stimuli independent of competition.

[1]  R. Desimone Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[3]  S. Martens,et al.  Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Competitive effects on steady-state visual evoked potentials with frequencies in- and outside the alpha band , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  H. Spitzer,et al.  Increased attention enhances both behavioral and neuronal performance. , 1988, Science.

[7]  S. Kastner,et al.  Interactions of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms in Human Visual Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Receptive field size-dependent attention effects in simultaneously presented stimulus displays , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  José L. Marroquín,et al.  Exploratory EEG data analysis for psychophysiological experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Alex R. Wade,et al.  Representation of Concurrent Stimuli by Population Activity in Visual Cortex , 2009, Neuron.

[11]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Competition in Visual Cortex Impedes Attention to Multiple Items , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  E. Vogel,et al.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  R. Desimone,et al.  A backward progression of attentional effects in the ventral stream , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[16]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. , 1998, Science.

[17]  N. Trujillo-Barreto,et al.  3D Statistical Parametric Mapping of EEG Source Spectra by Means of Variable Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (VARETA) , 2001, Clinical EEG.

[18]  D. Heeger,et al.  When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  G. Boynton A framework for describing the effects of attention on visual responses , 2009, Vision Research.

[20]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Attentional bias of competitive interactions in neuronal networks of early visual processing in the human brain , 2008, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Spatial Summation Can Explain the Attentional Modulation of Neuronal Responses to Multiple Stimuli in Area V4 , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Andersen,et al.  Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Bilateral Field Advantage in Visual Enumeration , 2011, PLoS ONE.

[24]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Modulation of sensory suppression: implications for receptive field sizes in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[27]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[29]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[30]  R. Dolan,et al.  Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual processing. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Paige E. Scalf,et al.  Attention does more than modulate suppressive interactions: attending to multiple items , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Attention Facilitates Multiple Stimulus Features in Parallel in Human Visual Cortex , 2008, Current Biology.

[36]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Spatial Attention Effects in Macaque Area V4 , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[38]  U. Neisser,et al.  Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  Seth E. Bouvier,et al.  Delayed effects of attention in visual cortex as measured with fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention induces synchronization-based response gain in steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of spatial selective attention in areas V1, V2, and V4 of macaque visual cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Effects of Feature-selective and Spatial Attention at Different Stages of Visual Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  S. A. Hillyard,et al.  Sustained division of the attentional spotlight , 2003, Nature.

[44]  Jean-François Delvenne,et al.  Splitting attention across the two visual fields in visual short-term memory , 2012, Cognition.

[45]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[46]  Søren K. Andersen,et al.  Feature-selective attention: Evidence for a decline in old age , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[47]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  S. Kastner,et al.  Stimulus similarity modulates competitive interactions in human visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[49]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Statistical control of artifacts in dense array EEG/MEG studies. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[50]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[51]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.