The Digital Transformation of Search and Recombination in the Innovation Function: Tensions and an Integrative Framework*

Search and recombination are important mechanisms in the creativity phase of innovation. Digital transformation and the resulting pervasive digitalization of the innovation function have often been associated with increasing possibilities for search and recombination. In this paper, by systematically integrating the search and recombination literature with the literature on digitalization, we demonstrate that digitalization may engender new idiosyncratic tensions in the organizational antecedents of search and recombination and, by implication, in their likely outcomes. We propose that, depending on the interactions among the idiosyncratic tensions identified herein, knowledge recombination might spur very different outcomes, including knowledge layering, knowledge integration, knowledge grafting, or even no recombination at all (which we label “search for the sake of search”). These outcomes may not always be the initially planned desired outcomes. Finally, we provide implications of our integrative framework pertaining to product development and to organizing for innovation.

[1]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Special Issue of Organization Science: Emerging Technologies and Organizing , 2019, Organization Science.

[2]  P. Marques,et al.  Creativity and Innovation through Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral Cooperation , 2007 .

[3]  A. Giudici,et al.  Pioneering strategies in the digital world. Insights from the Axel Springer case , 2017 .

[4]  Darl Kolb Exploring the Metaphor of Connectivity: Attributes, Dimensions and Duality , 2008 .

[5]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[6]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  How do multinational companies leverage technological competencies? Moving from single to interdependent explanations , 2004 .

[7]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[8]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  The satisficing principle in capability learning , 2000 .

[9]  Marc Gruber,et al.  From Minds to Markets , 2012 .

[10]  James A. Narus,et al.  Tiebreaker selling: how nonstrategic suppliers can help customers solve important problems , 2014 .

[11]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Q. Huy Emotional Balancing of Organizational Continuity and Radical Change: The Contribution of Middle Managers , 2002 .

[14]  Shlomo Hareli,et al.  Emotion cycles: On the social influence of emotion in organizations , 2008 .

[15]  Sharon F. Matusik,et al.  Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology , 2011 .

[16]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[17]  David J. Teece,et al.  The Market for Know-How and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology , 1981 .

[18]  Chris Forman,et al.  Digital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance? , 2019, Research Policy.

[19]  Christopher S. Mabey,et al.  Managing five paradoxes of knowledge exchange in networked organizations: new priorities for HRM? , 2017 .

[20]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Digital Innovation and the Division of Innovative Labor: Digital Controls in the Automotive Industry , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Who's Afraid of the Virtual World? Anxiety and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[22]  D. Teece Technology Transfer by Multinational Firms: The Resource Cost of Transferring Technological Know-How , 1977 .

[23]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[24]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[25]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Academic agility in digital innovation research: The case of mobile ICT publications within information systems 2000-2014 , 2015, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Digital Science and Knowledge Boundaries in Complex Innovation , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[27]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[28]  Keld Laursen Keep searching and you’ll find: what do we know about variety creation through firms’ search activities for innovation? , 2012 .

[29]  Jonathan Zittrain,et al.  Law and technologyThe end of the generative internet , 2009, CACM.

[30]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[31]  Oliver Baumann,et al.  Dealing with Complexity: Integrated vs. Chunky Search Processes , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[32]  J. Lerner,et al.  Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice , 2000 .

[33]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[34]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[35]  D. Teece Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world , 2018, Research Policy.

[36]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[37]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  More Innovation with Less? A Strategic Contingency View of Slack Resources, Information Search, and Radical Innovation† , 2014 .

[38]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .

[39]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[40]  Eric Overby,et al.  Process Virtualization Theory and the Impact of Information Technology , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[41]  Mohammad S. Rahman,et al.  An Internet-Enabled Move to the Market in Logistics , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Neeraj Bharadwaj,et al.  Finding Innovation in Data Rich Environments , 2017 .

[43]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use , 2010, MIS Q..

[44]  Robert D. Austin,et al.  Accidental Innovation: Supporting Valuable Unpredictability in the Creative Process , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Claudia Acklin Design‐Driven Innovation Process Model , 2010 .

[47]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  How constraints and knowledge impact open innovation , 2013 .

[48]  J. Anand,et al.  Knowledge Complexity and the Performance of Inter-Unit Knowledge Replication Structures , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[49]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Distant Search, Narrow Attention: How Crowding Alters Organizations’ Filtering of Suggestions in Crowdsourcing , 2014 .

[50]  C. Izard Emotion theory and research: highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[51]  Malte Brettel,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on New Product Development Performance , 2017 .

[52]  Ken E. Whelan,et al.  The Automation of Science , 2009, Science.

[53]  E. Giménez,et al.  Decision-driven marketing , 2014 .

[54]  Fred Langerak,et al.  More Research Priorities , 2015 .

[55]  Fredrik Tell,et al.  Where and how to search? Search paths in open innovation , 2016 .

[56]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[57]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[58]  Aseem Kaul,et al.  Structural Recombination and Innovation: Unlocking Intraorganizational Knowledge Synergy through Structural Change , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[59]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  The Intersection of Organizational Identity, Knowledge, and Practice: Attempting Strategic Change Via Knowledge Grafting , 2007 .

[60]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Turn to the material: Remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[61]  Florenta Teodoridis,et al.  Creativity at the Knowledge Frontier: The Impact of Specialization in Fast- and Slow-paced Domains* , 2018, Administrative Science Quarterly.

[62]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[63]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[64]  Anat Rafaeli,et al.  Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[65]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Social functionality of human emotion. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects , 2012 .

[67]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[68]  Q. Huy,et al.  Distributed Attention and Shared Emotions in the Innovation Process , 2016 .

[69]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  Materializing digital collecting: An extended view of digital materiality , 2018 .

[70]  Stuart Evans,et al.  Super-Flexibility for Real-Time Adaptation: Perspectives from Silicon Valley , 2011 .

[71]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Disruptive technology: How Kodak missed the digital photography revolution , 2009, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[72]  A. H. Segars,et al.  Realizing the Promise of E-Business: Developing and Leveraging Electronic Partnering Options , 2006 .

[73]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Crowdsourcing As a Solution to Distant Search , 2012 .

[74]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Science as a Map in Technological Search , 2000 .

[75]  Luigi Mario De Luca,et al.  Linking data-rich environments with service innovation in incumbent firms: a conceptual framework and research propositions , 2017 .

[76]  Markos Zachariadis,et al.  The API Economy and Digital Transformation in Financial Services: The Case of Open Banking , 2017 .

[77]  Chirag Patel,et al.  Retracted: Firm Adaptation, Preadaptation, and Sequential Ambidexterity in Firm Boundaries During an Era of Ferment and an Era of Incremental Change , 2018 .

[78]  Thierry Rayna,et al.  From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation , 2016 .

[79]  Sridhar Seshadri,et al.  Are flatter organizations more innovative? Hierarchical depth and the importance of ideas , 2008 .

[80]  A. Carmeli,et al.  The Influence of CEOs' Visionary Innovation Leadership on the Performance of High‐Technology Ventures: The Mediating Roles of Connectivity and Knowledge Integration , 2016 .

[81]  S. Harvey Creative Synthesis: Exploring the Process of Extraordinary Group Creativity , 2014 .

[82]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Entering an era of ferment – radical vs incrementalist strategies in automotive power train development , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[83]  E. Hippel Horizontal Innovation Networks - By and For Users , 2007 .

[84]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[85]  Gianluca Carnabuci,et al.  Where do firms' recombinant capabilities come from? Intraorganizational networks, knowledge, and firms' ability to innovate through technological recombination , 2013 .

[86]  R. Garud,et al.  TRANSFORMATIVE CAPACITY: CONTINUAL STRUCTURING BY INTERTEMPORAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER , 1994 .

[87]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[88]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  A theory of digital objects , 2010, First Monday.

[89]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[90]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[91]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  External Knowledge and Information Technology: Implications for Process Innovation Performance , 2017, MIS Q..

[92]  Karolina M. Lempert,et al.  Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits. , 2014, Annual review of neuroscience.

[93]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS, CONSEQUENCES AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[94]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[95]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[96]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks , 2016, Inf. Syst. J..

[97]  Rahul C. Basole Visualization of interfirm relations in a converging mobile ecosystem , 2008, 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business.

[98]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[99]  Robert F. Lusch,et al.  Service Innovation: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[100]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[101]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[102]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[103]  O. A. Sawy,et al.  Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights , 2013 .

[104]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators , 2008 .

[105]  R. Cross,et al.  Using Social Network Analysis to Improve Communities of Practice , 2006 .

[106]  Jeongsik Lee,et al.  The Quest for Originality: A New Typology of Knowledge Search and Breakthrough Inventions , 2016 .

[107]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[108]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi‐contextuality in boundary‐spanning practices , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[109]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[110]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Transformational Technologies and the Creation of New Work Practices: Making Implicit Knowledge Explicit in Task-based Offshoring , 2008, MIS Q..

[111]  Phanish Puranam,et al.  What Is Different About Digital Strategy? From Quantitative to Qualitative Change , 2019, Strategy Science.

[112]  Steven Pinch,et al.  Innovation in a creative production system: the case of design , 2008 .

[113]  Cem Ersoy,et al.  Wireless sensor networks for healthcare: A survey , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[114]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[115]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  A model of the Internet as creative destroyer , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[116]  Joel West,et al.  When do firms undertake open, collaborative activities? Introduction to the special section on open innovation and open business models , 2016 .

[117]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Robot-assisted remote surgery: technological advances, potential complications, and solutions. , 2004, Surgical technology international.

[118]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Idea Rejected, Tie Formed: Organizations’ Feedback on Crowdsourced Ideas , 2019, Academy of Management Journal.

[119]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Studying Organizational Change , 2005 .

[120]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[121]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[122]  Duncan Angwin,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue. 'Connectivity' in Merging Organizations: Beyond Traditional Cultural Perspectives , 2005 .

[123]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D , 1994 .

[124]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[125]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[126]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes , 1983 .

[127]  Darl G. Kolb,et al.  States of Connectivity: New Questions and New Directions , 2012 .

[128]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities , 2007 .

[129]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[130]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[131]  G. Pisano Knowledge Integration and the Locus of Learning: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[132]  J. Wajcman,et al.  Constant Connectivity: Rethinking Interruptions at Work , 2011 .

[133]  Andrew B. Hargadon Brokering knowledge: Linking learning and innovation , 2002 .

[134]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  Cognition and Capabilities: A Multi-Level Perspective , 2013 .

[135]  Quy Nguyen Huy,et al.  How middle managers' group‐focus emotions and social identities influence strategy implementation , 2011 .

[136]  Nora Madjar,et al.  Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[137]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Minding the Gaps: Understanding Technology Interdependence and Coordination in Knowledge Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[138]  Erhard Bruderer,et al.  Organizational Evolution, Learning, and Selection: A Genetic-Algorithm-Based Model , 1996 .

[139]  Stella Pachidi,et al.  Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm , 2018, Inf. Organ..

[140]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Rate or Trade? Identifying Winning Ideas in Open Idea Sourcing , 2016, Inf. Syst. Res..

[141]  Will Mitchell,et al.  The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market , 1998 .

[142]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[143]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[144]  Sabine Brunswicker,et al.  Optimizing and Satisficing: The Interplay Between Platform Architecture and Producers' Design Strategies for Platform Performance , 2019, MIS Q..

[145]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Knowledge Recombination Across Technological Boundaries: Scientists vs. Engineers , 2013, Manag. Sci..

[146]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off☆ , 2017 .

[147]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  The Lure of the Virtual , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[148]  J. Howells The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart , 2012 .

[149]  Lisen Selander,et al.  Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[150]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  On the Origin of Strategy: Action and Cognition over Time , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[151]  Mike Wright,et al.  The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes , 2019, Research Policy.

[152]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[153]  G. E. Marsh A Routine Flame-Photometric Determination of Organic Chloride , 1958 .

[154]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  FROM SUPPORT TO MUTINY: SHIFTING LEGITIMACY JUDGMENTS AND EMOTIONAL REACTIONS IMPACTING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RADICAL CHANGE , 2014 .

[155]  T. Marion,et al.  Back-loading: A Potential Side Effect of Employing Digital Design Tools in New Product Development: Side Effect of Digital Design Tools in NPD , 2012 .

[156]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[157]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  Perspective: A Review of Marketing Research on Product Design with Directions for Future Research , 2016 .

[158]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions , 2015, MIS Q..

[159]  Gualtiero Fantoni,et al.  The light and shade of knowledge recombination: Insights from a general-purpose technology , 2017 .

[160]  Angèle Christin,et al.  Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control , 2020, Academy of Management Annals.

[161]  V. Albino,et al.  Search and Recombination Process to Innovate: A Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Research Agenda , 2017 .

[162]  Gino Cattani,et al.  The Value of Moderate Obsession: Insights from a New Model of Organizational Search , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[163]  SørensenCarsten,et al.  Academic agility in digital innovation research , 2015 .

[164]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[165]  M. Polanyi Sense-Giving and Sense-Reading , 1967, Philosophy.

[166]  S. Winter,et al.  The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited , 1982 .

[167]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[168]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[169]  Ramachandran Jaikumar,et al.  A dynamic approach to operations management: An alternative to static optimization , 1992 .

[170]  Jelena Spanjol,et al.  How Many and What Kind? The Role of Strategic Orientation in New Product Ideation , 2009 .

[171]  F. Piller,et al.  How Firms Develop Capabilities for Crowdsourcing to Increase Open Innovation Performance: The Interplay between Organizational Roles and Knowledge Processes , 2019, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[172]  Melissa Mazmanian Avoiding the Trap of Constant Connectivity: When Congruent Frames Allow for Heterogeneous Practices , 2013 .

[173]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[174]  Tony Edwards,et al.  Power, institutions and the cross-national transfer of employment practices in multinationals , 2012 .

[175]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[176]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[177]  K Galanakis,et al.  Innovation process. Make sense using systems thinking , 2006 .

[178]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship Between Software Comprehension and Modification , 2006, MIS Q..

[179]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[180]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[181]  Oguz Ali Acar,et al.  Motivations and solution appropriateness in crowdsourcing challenges for innovation , 2019, Research Policy.

[182]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..