Applying social network analysis in economic geography : theoretical and methodological issues

Social network analysis attracts increasing attention in economic geography. We claim social network analysis is a promising tool for empirically investigating the structure and evolution of inter-organizational interaction and knowledge flows within and across regions. However, the potential of the application of network methodology to regional issues is far from exhausted. The aim of our paper is twofold. The first objective is to shed light on the untapped potential of social network analysis techniques in economic geography: we set out some theoretical challenges concerning the static and dynamic analysis of networks in geography. Basically, we claim that network analysis has a huge potential to enrich the literature on clusters, regional innovation systems and knowledge spillovers. The second objective is to describe how these challenges can be met through the application of network analysis techniques, using primary (survey) and secondary (patent) data. We argue that the choice between these two types of data has strong implications for the type of research questions that can be dealt with in economic geograhy, such as the feasibility of dynamic network analysis.

[1]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  The Evolution of Knowledge and the Dynamics of an Industry Network , 1997 .

[2]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[3]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Modeling the world-wide airport network , 2004 .

[4]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Knowledge, Market Structure, and Economic Coordination: Dynamics of Industrial Districts , 2002 .

[5]  T. Snijders.  The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics , 2001 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Koen Frenken,et al.  The Geographical and Institutional Proximity of Scientific Collaboration Networks , 2006 .

[8]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[9]  S. Breschi,et al.  Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data , 2004 .

[10]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[11]  Hristian,et al.  Everything you Always Wanted to Know About Inventors (But Never Asked): Evidence from the PatVal-EU Survey , 2006 .

[12]  F. Lissoni,et al.  www.druid.dk DRUID Working Paper No. 06-15 What do you mean by “mobile”? Multi-applicant inventors in the European Bio-Technology Industry By Francesco Laforgia and Frencesco Lissoni www.druid.dk What do you mean by “mobile”? Multi-applicant inventors in the European Bio-Technology Industry , 2006 .

[13]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[14]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[15]  B. Dousset.  Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry , 2005 .

[16]  Gernot Grabher.  Trading routes, bypasses, and risky intersections: mapping the travels of `networks' between economic sociology and economic geography , 2006 .

[17]  Andrea Morrison,et al.  Gatekeepers of Knowledge within Industrial Districts: Who They Are, How They Interact , 2008 .

[18]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[19]  Johannes Glückler.  Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks , 2007 .

[20]  Luciano Rossoni,et al.  Models and methods in social network analysis , 2006 .

[21]  P. Cooke.  Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy , 2001 .

[22]  Olav Sorenson.  Social networks and industrial geography , 2003 .

[23]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[24]  R. Gulati.  Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation , 1999 .

[25]  M. Bell,et al.  The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster , 2005 .

[26]  Nicolas Jonard,et al.  Knowledge Dynamics in a Network Industry , 2004 .

[27]  U. Cantner,et al.  Determinants influencing the choice of a cooperation partner , 2006 .

[28]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[29]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  The Spatial Dimension of Patenting by Multinational Firms in Europe , 2002 .

[30]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  Salvatore Torrisi,et al.  Markets for technology , 2001 .

[32]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets , 2004 .

[33]  J. Hagedoorn.  Sharing intellectual property rights - an exploratory study of joint patenting amongst companies. , 2003 .

[34]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[35]  Charlie Karlsson,et al.  Interregional Inventor Networks as Studied by Patent Co-inventorships , 2006 .

[36]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[37]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis , 2006 .

[38]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[39]  Elisa Giuliani.  Networks and Heterogeneous Performance of Cluster Firms , 2006 .

[40]  A. Geuna,et al.  University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence , 2006 .

[41]  Robert M. Hunt,et al.  An Empirical Look at Software Patents , 2004 .