The Competitive Advantage of a Dual-Transporter System

Low-affinity nutrient transporters sense depletion earlier than high-affinity transporters, thus preparing cells for starvation. Cells use transporters of different affinities to regulate nutrient influx. When nutrients are depleted, low-affinity transporters are replaced by high-affinity ones. High-affinity transporters are helpful when concentrations of nutrients are low, but the advantage of reducing their abundance when nutrients are abundant is less clear. When we eliminated such reduced production of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high-affinity transporters for phosphate and zinc, the elapsed time from the initiation of the starvation program until the lack of nutrients limited growth was shortened, and recovery from starvation was delayed. The latter phenotype was rescued by constitutive activation of the starvation program. Dual-transporter systems appear to prolong preparation for starvation and to facilitate subsequent recovery, which may optimize sensing of nutrient depletion by integrating internal and external information about nutrient availability.

[1]  S. Snyder,et al.  HIGH AFFINITY TRANSPORT OF CHOLINE INTO SYNAPTOSOMES OF RAT BRAIN 1 , 1973, Journal of neurochemistry.

[2]  M. Brandriss,et al.  Proline transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1981, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  B. Wilkinson,et al.  Proline transport in Staphylococcus aureus: a high-affinity system and a low-affinity system involved in osmoregulation , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  K. Raghothama,et al.  Phosphate transporters from the higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  B. André,et al.  Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology A Family of Ammonium Transporters in , 1997 .

[6]  D. Eide The molecular biology of metal ion transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1998, Annual review of nutrition.

[7]  N. Amrhein,et al.  Pht2;1 Encodes a Low-Affinity Phosphate Transporter from Arabidopsis , 1999, Plant Cell.

[8]  J. Ashby References and Notes , 1999 .

[9]  P. Brown,et al.  New components of a system for phosphate accumulation and polyphosphate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic expression analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[10]  S. Howitt,et al.  Characterization of PitA and PitB fromEscherichia coli , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[11]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Phosphate transport and sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[12]  Y. Tsay,et al.  Switching between the two action modes of the dual‐affinity nitrate transporter CHL1 by phosphorylation , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[13]  Erin K O'Shea,et al.  Partially Phosphorylated Pho4 Activates Transcription of a Subset of Phosphate-Responsive Genes , 2003, PLoS biology.

[14]  D. Winge,et al.  Zinc fingers can act as Zn2+ sensors to regulate transcriptional activation domain function , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[15]  B. Persson,et al.  Regulation of phosphate acquisition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2003, Current Genetics.

[16]  M. Shirakawa,et al.  Intracellular Phosphate Serves as a Signal for the Regulation of the PHO Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  D. Munn,et al.  A high‐affinity, tryptophan‐selective amino acid transport system in human macrophages , 2006, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[18]  D. Winge,et al.  Zinc binding to a regulatory zinc-sensing domain monitored in vivo by using FRET. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Raser,et al.  Positive feedback regulates switching of phosphate transporters in S. cerevisiae. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[20]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Strategy of Transcription Regulation in the Budding Yeast , 2007, PloS one.

[21]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Regulation of a Cyclin-CDK-CDK Inhibitor Complex by Inositol Pyrophosphates , 2007, Science.

[22]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Predictive Behavior Within Microbial Genetic Networks , 2008, Science.

[23]  J. Martín,et al.  Phosphate-dependent regulation of the low- and high-affinity transport systems in the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor. , 2008, Microbiology.

[24]  D. Eide Homeostatic and Adaptive Responses to Zinc Deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  Adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms , 2009, Nature.

[26]  R. Kishony,et al.  Nonoptimal Microbial Response to Antibiotics Underlies Suppressive Drug Interactions , 2009, Cell.

[27]  Naama Barkai,et al.  Coordination of gene expression with growth rate: A feedback or a feed‐forward strategy? , 2009, FEBS letters.

[28]  Noam Slonim,et al.  Glucose regulates transcription in yeast through a network of signaling pathways , 2009, Molecular systems biology.