Evaluation of Collimation Prediction Based on Depth Images and Automated Landmark Detection for Routine Clinical Chest X-Ray Exams

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a machine learning algorithm applied to depth images for the automated computation of X-ray beam collimation parameters in radiographic chest examinations including posterior-anterior (PA) and left-lateral (LAT) views. Our approach used as intermediate step a trained classifier for the detection of internal lung landmarks that were defined on X-ray images acquired simultaneously with the depth image. The landmark detection algorithm was evaluated retrospectively in a 5-fold cross validation experiment on the basis of 89 patient data sets acquired in clinical settings. Two auto-collimation algorithms were devised and their results were compared to the reference lung bounding boxes defined on the X-ray images and to the manual collimation parameters set by the radiologic technologists.

[1]  Bjørn Hofmann,et al.  Image rejects in general direct digital radiography , 2015, Acta radiologica open.

[2]  Günther Greiner,et al.  Markerless estimation of patient orientation, posture and pose using range and pressure imaging , 2012, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[3]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Object recognition with uncertain geometry and uncertain part detection , 2005, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[4]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Efficient Human Pose Estimation from Single Depth Images , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Gérard G. Medioni,et al.  Object modeling by registration of multiple range images , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  A. Brahme,et al.  4D laser camera for accurate patient positioning, collision avoidance, image fusion and adaptive approaches during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. , 2008, Medical physics.

[7]  Ingrid Reiser,et al.  Unified Database for Rejected Image Analysis Across Multiple Vendors in Radiography. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[8]  Charles E. Willis,et al.  One Year’s Results from a Server-Based System for Performing Reject Analysis and Exposure Analysis in Computed Radiography , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  B. Scherrer,et al.  Development of a tool to aid the radiologic technologist using augmented reality and computer vision , 2017, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  Birgi Tamersoy,et al.  DARWIN: Deformable Patient Avatar Representation With Deep Image Network , 2017, MICCAI.

[11]  Bruce I. Reiner,et al.  Digital Radiography Reject Analysis: Data Collection Methodology, Results, and Recommendations from an In-depth Investigation at Two Hospitals , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[12]  Yizong Cheng,et al.  Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..