Real‐time rowing simulator with multimodal feedback

Efficient rowing requires both physical and technical abilities of the human. Teaching and learning of the technical abilities is thereby mainly restricted to on-water training. The aim of this project was to develop a rowing simulator. This simulator should serve as a high-level indoor training tool that can be used by rowing novices and professionals. The users should perceive acoustic, visual, and haptic cues about their current performance and their environment in real time. The newly-developed rowing simulator consists of a rowing boat hull equipped with multiple position sensors attached to the oar and seat. The boat hull was mounted on a podium placed inside a Cave setup. The Cave comprises projection screens, a loudspeaker system, and actuated winches for visual, acoustic, and haptic feedback, respectively. A mathematical real-time rowing model was developed, which computes the boat velocity and the oar force as a function of the movement of the oar and the user. All relevant boat, oar, and user parameters can be arbitrarily set, thus allowing the simulation of different boat types. The rowing model was validated by comparing results of the simulation with data from on-water measurements. Both the boat velocity and the oar force predicted by the model correlated highly with the experimentally-obtained data. Furthermore, the rowing simulator was successfully tested with professional rowers who rated the level of realism and the applicability of the simulator for indoor training as high. Based on the feedback of the rowers, various hardware and software extensions are planned for the simulator, including an increase of the number of actuated degrees of freedom of the boat and the oar, in order to improve the haptic feedback. © 2008 John Wiley and Sons Asia Pte Ltd

[1]  Constanze Loschner,et al.  Biomechanics feedback for rowing , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[2]  H. Gerber,et al.  Biomechanical Performance Analysis in Rowing with a new Measuring System , 1985 .

[3]  R. Riener,et al.  Hybrid actuation concepts for a rope robot as a haptic interface , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[4]  Trevor N Gardner,et al.  Optimization of oar blade design for improved performance in rowing , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  A Ruina,et al.  A simple 1+ dimensional model of rowing mimics observed forces and motions. , 2006, Human movement science.

[6]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Design constraints for haptic surgery simulation , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[7]  A Baudouin,et al.  A biomechanical review of factors affecting rowing performance , 2002, British journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Michael N. Macrossan The direction of the water force on a rowing blade and its effect on efficiency , 2008 .

[9]  Nick Caplan,et al.  Modelling the influence of crew movement on boat velocity fluctuations during the rowing stroke , 2007 .

[10]  Maurice N. Brearley,et al.  Improving the efficiency of racing shell oars , 2000 .

[11]  Trevor N Gardner,et al.  A fluid dynamic investigation of the Big Blade and Macon oar blade designs in rowing propulsion , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  Alastair Campbell Ritchie Dynamic modeling of ergometer and on-water rowing , 2008 .

[13]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  The RowPerfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. , 2002, Sports biomechanics.

[14]  Mathijs J. Hofmijster,et al.  Effect of stroke rate on the distribution of net mechanical power in rowing , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  D Hawkins A new instrumentation system for training rowers. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  Bruce Elliott,et al.  QUANTIFYING THE HAND-CURVE AND OARLOCK FORCES FOR DETERMINING THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXPERIENCED AND ELITE MALE SWEEP ROWERS , 2002 .