Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences

Universities and international organizations are adopting and promoting Active Learning strategies, respectively. Reasons are varied, including that this approach has proven to prepare competitive students who are skilled to address the main problems of society once they enter the labor market. Active Learning is a student-centered-learning approach that involves the learner directly in the process. It consists of letting students be the main actors of the learning process by performing meaningful activities and critically thinking about what they are doing. In this research, a review of Active Learning is performed. The focus is on presenting concepts and practices central to Active Learning that leading universities are deploying, universities such as Massachusetts Institute of Technology, North Carolina State University and Aalborg University. Also, the authors describe in this paper a case from their experience with Active Learning techniques in specified areas of engineering education at Tecnologico de Monterrey. Results indicate that this approach supports the development of in-demand competencies such as Teamwork, Problem-solving and Analysis. In addition, students’ performance and retention rates are improved. In the engineering field, students can acquire and practice different technical skills under supervision. Active Learning is a very flexible approach that can be integrated in a gradual manner by any organization. The authors have constructed this research to be a useful guide to Active Learning practices. It can support engineering professors and people interested in knowing or adopting this approach for improving their students’ results.

[1]  D. Christopher Brooks,et al.  Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  S. Senthamarai Interactive teaching strategies , 2018 .

[3]  E. Graaff,et al.  History of problem-based and project-based learning , 2007 .

[4]  J. D. Walker,et al.  It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Ricardo Ambrocio Ramírez-Mendoza,et al.  Teaching semi-active suspension control using an experimental platform , 2016, 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

[6]  Mary Jo Wagner,et al.  Not another boring lecture: engaging learners with active learning techniques. , 2015, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  Marisa K. Orr,et al.  Special session - enhancing student learning using SCALE-UP format , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[8]  EXEMPLARY TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED CONTEMPORARY ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS FOR STEM COURSES , 2016 .

[9]  Ruben Morales-Menendez,et al.  Technological innovations and practices in engineering education: a review , 2019, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM).

[10]  Michael J. Peeters,et al.  An Active-Learning Strategies Primer for Achieving Ability-Based Educational Outcomes , 2011, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[11]  Jon D. H. Gaffney,et al.  Promoting Active Learning in Technology-Infused TILE Classrooms at the University of Iowa , 2012 .

[12]  Leeann Cardaciotto,et al.  Is Active Learning Like Broccoli? Student Perceptions of Active Learning in Large Lecture Classes. , 2011 .

[13]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[14]  David Gijbels,et al.  Deep and surface learning in problem-based learning: a review of the literature , 2015, Advances in Health Sciences Education.

[15]  Valerie Drew,et al.  Extending the constructs of active learning: implications for teachers' pedagogy and practice , 2011 .

[16]  Divya Asok,et al.  Active Learning Environment for Achieving Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Engineering Education , 2016, 2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on MOOCs, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE).

[17]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  TILE at Iowa: Adoption and Adaptation , 2014 .

[19]  Ruben Morales-Menendez,et al.  Plug and Play with a QoV Model , 2015, CSEDU 2015.

[20]  Timothy R. Graeff,et al.  Strategic Teaching for Active Learning , 2010 .

[21]  Monique Dikboom Tackling Big Deals: the experience of Maastricht University , 2016 .

[22]  Kenn Fisher,et al.  Technology-Enabled Active Learning Environments: An Appraisal , 2010 .

[23]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[24]  Flemming Kobberøe Fink,et al.  The Aalborg PBL model : progress, diversity and challenges , 2004 .

[25]  Selma Vonderwell,et al.  Promoting Formative Assessment in Online Teaching and Learning , 2013 .

[26]  D. Christopher Brooks,et al.  Making the Case for Space: Three Years of Empirical Research on Learning Environments , 2010 .

[27]  Tricia Hedge,et al.  Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom , 2000 .

[28]  Virginia S. Lee,et al.  What is inquiry-guided learning? , 2012 .

[29]  José M. Díaz-Puente,et al.  Project–based learning in engineering higher education: two decades of teaching competences in real environments , 2010 .

[30]  Ruben Morales-Menendez,et al.  AC 2008-2602: DRAG-AND-DROP GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE FOR PROCESS CONTROL EDUCATION , 2008 .