Electrocardiographic signs of remote myocardial infarction.

Twelve-lead electrocardiogram is an integral part of the evaluation of an acute and a remote myocardial infarction (MI). Electrocardiographic signs of an acute ST-elevation MI are more precise than those of an acute non-ST-elevation MI. Recognition of a remote MI is more difficult because once the repolarization abnormalities (ST-segment and T-wave changes) stabilize after an acute MI resolves, then the Q wave remains as the only universally recognized sign of MI. In addition, there is no specific sign of a non-Q-wave MI or a non-ST-elevation MI, or in fact of an ST-elevation MI that did not result in Q waves. The fragmented QRS (fQRS) is another recently described sign of a remote MI. It is defined by the presence of an additional R wave (R') or notching in the nadir of the S wave, or the presence of >1 R' (fragmentation) in 2 contiguous leads corresponding to a major coronary artery territory. The specificity of fQRS is inferior to that of a Q wave for an MI scar (89% vs 99%). However, fQRS has a superior sensitivity and a negative predictive value compared with a Q wave. In addition, there is an incremental gain in the sensitivity up to 91.4% when these 2 signs (fQRS and Q wave) are combined. The repolarization abnormalities of MI may also persist indefinitely as a sign of a remote MI in few patients. These abnormalities include persistent ST elevation, ST depression, nonspecific ST-T wave changes, and T-wave inversion.

[1]  E. Braunwald Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  E. Negri,et al.  Determinants of 6‐Month Mortality in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction After Thrombolysis Results of the GISSI‐2 Data Base , 1993, Circulation.

[3]  Frans J. Th. Wackers,et al.  Use of the initial electrocardiogram to predict in-hospital complications of acute myocardial infarction. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G. Thorgeirsson,et al.  Risk factors for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Reykjavik Study. , 2005 .

[5]  J. Soler‐Soler,et al.  Comparison of patients with anterior wall healed myocardial infarction with and without exercise-induced ST-segment elevation. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Jan A Kors,et al.  Defining unrecognized myocardial infarction: a call for standardized electrocardiographic diagnostic criteria. , 2004, American heart journal.

[7]  H. Hod,et al.  Q wave and Non-Q wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  B. Strasberg,et al.  Transient right axis deviation during acute anterior wall infarction or ischemia: electrocardiographic and angiographic correlation. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  A. Hofman,et al.  Incidence of recognized and unrecognized myocardial infarction in men and women aged 55 and older: the Rotterdam Study. , 2006, European heart journal.

[10]  Kannel Wb Prevalence and clinical aspects of unrecognized myocardial infarction and sudden unexpected death. , 1987 .

[11]  W. Dassen,et al.  Prognostic value of Q waves, R/S ratio, loss of R wave voltage, ST-T segment abnormalities, electrical axis, low voltage and notching: correlation of electrocardiogram and left ventriculogram. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J S Alpert,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  M. Grzybowski,et al.  Prognostic value of a normal or nonspecific initial electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, JAMA.

[14]  D. Mirvis,et al.  R and S wave changes produced by experimental nontransmural and transmural myocardial infarction. , 1986, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  M. Dunn,et al.  Postinfarction ventricular aneurysms , 1995, Clinical cardiology.

[16]  C. Antzelevitch,et al.  Characteristics of the delayed rectifier current (IKr and IKs) in canine ventricular epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial myocytes. A weaker IKs contributes to the longer action potential of the M cell. , 1995, Circulation research.

[17]  D. Penney,et al.  Value of notching and slurring of the resting QRS complex in the detection of ischemic heart disease , 1990, Clinical cardiology.

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy: angiographic and prognostic insights from the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries-I angiographic substudy. GUSTO-I Angiographic Investigators. , 1998, Circulation.

[19]  N. Mills,et al.  Technical advances in the treatment of left ventricular aneurysm. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  R. Califf,et al.  Thrombolysis and Q wave versus non-Q wave first acute myocardial infarction: a GUSTO-I substudy. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Arteries Investigators. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  R. Gorlin,et al.  Natural history of S-T segment elevation after acute myocardial infarction. , 1975, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  R. Dewey,et al.  Relation of ST-segment elevation after healing of acute myocardial infarction to the presence of left ventricular aneurysm. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  B. Gersh,et al.  Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  J. Gore,et al.  Twenty-two year (1975 to 1997) trends in the incidence, in-hospital and long-term case fatality rates from initial Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a multi-hospital, community-wide perspective. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  E. Kentala,et al.  Occurrence and regression of initial and terminal notching of the QRS complex in the electrocardiograms of patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1975, Annals of clinical research.

[26]  D. Spodick Q-wave infarction versus S-T infarction. Nonspecificity of electrocardiographic criteria for differentiating transmural and nontransmural lesions. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  L. Horan,et al.  The Anatomic Basis for High‐Frequency Components in the Electrocardiogram , 1969, Circulation.

[28]  M. Das,et al.  Significance of a Fragmented QRS Complex Versus a Q Wave in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease , 2006, Circulation.

[29]  British Regional Heart Study: the electrocardiogram and risk of myocardial infarction on follow-up. , 1987 .

[30]  F. Carreras,et al.  Concordance of electrocardiographic patterns and healed myocardial infarction location detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[31]  G. De Backer,et al.  Prognostic value of ECG findings for total, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease death in men and women , 1998, Heart.

[32]  P. Høilund-Carlsen,et al.  Redefinition of the Q wave -- is there a clinical problem? , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  John Kassotis,et al.  Fragmented Left Sided QRS in Absence of Bundle Branch Block: Sign of Left Ventricular Aneurysm , 2006, Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc.

[34]  D. Levy,et al.  Prognostic significance of the electrocardiogram after Q wave myocardial infarction. The Framingham Study. , 1990, Circulation.

[35]  W. Kannel,et al.  Electrocardiographic precursors of sudden unexpected death: the Framingham Study , 1987, Circulation.

[36]  T. Naruko,et al.  Significance of Q wave disappearance in the chronic phase following transmural acute myocardial infarction. , 1990, Japanese circulation journal.

[37]  R A Warner,et al.  Electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of anterior myocardial infarction: importance of the duration of precordial R waves. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[38]  K. Anderson,et al.  Nonspecific electrocardiographic abnormality as a predictor of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study. , 1987, American heart journal.

[39]  L. Shaw,et al.  Early and 1-year clinical outcome of patients' evolving non-Q-wave versus Q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolysis. Results from The TIMI II Study. , 1995, Circulation.

[40]  H. Burchell,et al.  Postinfarction ventricular aneurysm. A clinicomorphologic and electrocardiographic study of 80 cases. , 1965, American heart journal.

[41]  N. El-Sherif The rsR′ pattern in left surface leads in ventricular aneurysm , 1970, British heart journal.

[42]  R. Schlant,et al.  The Natural History of Coronary Heart Disease: Prognostic Factors After Recovery from Myocardial Infarction in 2789 Men The 5‐year Findings of the Coronary Drug Project prepared for the Coronary Drug Project Research Group bv , 1982, Circulation.

[43]  P. Varriale,et al.  The RSR' complex not related to right bundle branch block: diagnostic value as a sign of myocardial infarction scar. , 1992, American heart journal.

[44]  A. Moss,et al.  Q-wave versus non-Q wave myocardial infarction: a meaningless distinction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[45]  B. Brendorp,et al.  Does the electrocardiographic presence of Q waves influence the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction? , 2001, European heart journal.

[46]  A. Mattu,et al.  The prominent T wave: electrocardiographic differential diagnosis. , 2002, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[47]  R. Warner,et al.  Usefulness of abnormalities of repolarization in the electrocardiographic diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction. , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[48]  B. Phibbs "Transmural" versus "subendocardial" myocardial infarction: an electrocardiographic myth. , 1983, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  L. Horan,et al.  Localization of the Site of Myocardial Scarring in Man by High‐Frequency Components , 1969, Circulation.

[50]  The Natural History of Coronary Heart Disease: Prognostic Factors After Recovery from Myocardial Infarction in 2789 Men The 5‐year Findings of the Coronary Drug Project prepared for the Coronary Drug Project Research Group bv , 1982 .

[51]  J. Spear,et al.  A computer model of the electrogram: what causes fractionation? , 1988, Journal of electrocardiology.

[52]  T. D. Schick,et al.  Spectral analysis of the high-frequency electrocardiogram in contusive myocardial injury , 1978, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[53]  S. K. Bhatnagar,et al.  Observations of the relationship between left ventricular aneurysm and ST segment elevation in patients with a first acute anterior Q wave myocardial infarction. , 1994, European heart journal.

[54]  E. Simonson,et al.  The Electrocardiogram in Population Studies: A Classification System , 1960, Circulation.

[55]  P. Ursell,et al.  Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. , 1985, Circulation.

[56]  W. Voon,et al.  Q-wave regression after acute myocardial infarction assessed by Tl-201 myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[57]  M. Lesh,et al.  Fractionated electrograms from a computer model of heterogeneously uncoupled anisotropic ventricular myocardium. , 1995, Circulation.

[58]  R. O'rourke,et al.  Clinical and prognostic importance of persistent precordial (V1-V4) electrocardiographic ST segment depression in patients with inferior transmural myocardial infarction. , 1986, Circulation.

[59]  C. Owens,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: current concepts for the physician. , 2006, Journal of electrocardiology.

[60]  J. Edwards,et al.  Correlation of electrocardiographic and pathologic findings in healed myocardial infarction. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.