Integration of Imperfect Spatial Information

The theme of this paper is integration of information arising from observations of spatial entities and relationships. The assumption is that observations are imperfect; in particular, that they are imprecise and inaccurate. Each observation is made in a context that among other things provides a level of resolution. So, a treatment of integration of observations of this type must take account of multiresolution spatial data models. After an introduction, the paper discusses an ontology of imperfection, focusing on imprecision and inaccuracy. The paper goes on to consider logics that are appropriate for integration of information arising from imperfect observations. Two case studies, showing some of the facets of this treatment are developed in greater detail. The first case study considers integration of imperfect (inaccurate and imprecise) observations of a single spatial region. The second case study develops the theory of regions with broad boundary to address the issue of integrating imprecise observations of spatial relationships. ( 2001 Academic Press

[1]  P. Burrough,et al.  Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries , 1996 .

[2]  Giuliana Dettori,et al.  Towards a Formal Model for Multi-Resolution Spatial Maps , 1995, SSD.

[3]  D. Mark,et al.  The Nature Of Boundaries On ‘Area-Class’ Maps , 1989 .

[4]  Gordon P. Baker,et al.  Wittgenstein : understanding and meaning , 1980 .

[5]  Michel Scholl,et al.  Multi-Scale Partitions: Application to Spatial and Statistical Databases , 1995, SSD.

[6]  Eliseo Clementini,et al.  Approximate topological relations , 1997, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[7]  Janusz Zalewski,et al.  Rough sets: Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data , 1996 .

[8]  Michael F. Worboys,et al.  Imprecision in Finite Resolution Spatial Data , 1998, GeoInformatica.

[9]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Qualitative and Topological Relationships in Spatial Databases , 1993, SSD.

[10]  Simon Parsons,et al.  Addendum to "Current Approaches to Handling Imperfect Information in Data and Knowledge Bases" , 1996, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[11]  Christian Freksa,et al.  Temporal Reasoning Based on Semi-Intervals , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[12]  Markus Schneider.  Modeling Spatial Objects with Undetermined Boundaries Using the Realm/ROSE Approach1 , 1996 .

[13]  Markus Schneider,et al.  Vague Regions , 1997, SSD.

[14]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Rough-Fuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend in Decision Making , 1999 .

[15]  Brian A. Davey,et al.  An Introduction to Lattices and Order , 1989 .

[16]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  Representing Spatial Vagueness: A Mereological Approach , 1996, KR.

[17]  Anthony G. Cohn.  The challenge of qualitative spatial reasoning , 1995, CSUR.

[18]  Anthony G. Cohn,et al.  The ‘Egg-Yolk’ Representation of Regions with Indeterminate Boundaries , 2020 .

[19]  M. Worboys.  Computation with imprecise geospatial data , 1998 .

[20]  David Unwin,et al.  Visualization In Geographical Information Systems , 1996 .

[21]  Gordon P. Baker,et al.  Wittgenstein Understanding and Meaning: An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations , 1980 .

[22]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[23]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Reasoning about Gradual Changes of Topological Relationships , 1992, Spatio-Temporal Reasoning.

[24]  Peter F. Smith,et al.  Vagueness: A Reader , 1999 .