Consider a communication network G in which a limited number of link and/or node faults F might occur. A routing &rgr; for the network (a fixed path between each pair of nodes) must be chosen without any knowledge of which components might become faulty. Choosing a good routing corresponds to bounding the diameter of the surviving route graph R(G,&rgr;)/F, where two nonfaulty nodes are joined by an edge if there are no faults on the route between them. We prove a number of results concerning the diameter of surviving route graphs. We show that if &rgr; is a minimal length routing, then the diameter of R(G,&rgr;)/F can be on the order of the number of nodes of G, even if F consists of only a single node. However, if G is the n-dimensional cube, the diameter of R(G,&rgr;)/F≤3 for any minimal length routing &rgr; and any set of faults F with |F|<n. We also show that if F consists only of edges and does not disconnect G, then the diameter of R(G,&rgr;)/F is ≤ 3|F|+1, while if F consists only of nodes and does not disconnect G, then the diameter of R(G,&rgr;)/F is ≤ the sum of the degrees of the nodes in F, where in both cases &rgr; is an arbitrary minimal length routing. We conclude with one of the most important contributions of this paper: a list of interesting and apparently difficult open problems.
[1]
Claude Berge,et al.
Graphs and Hypergraphs
,
2021,
Clustering.
[2]
Leslie G. Valiant,et al.
A Scheme for Fast Parallel Communication
,
1982,
SIAM J. Comput..
[3]
Danny Dolev,et al.
Authenticated Algorithms for Byzantine Agreement
,
1983,
SIAM J. Comput..
[4]
Paul Feldman.
Fault tolerance of minimal path routings in a network
,
1985,
STOC '85.
[5]
Andrei Z. Broder,et al.
Efficient fault tolerant routings in networks
,
1984,
STOC '84.
[6]
A. Bonato,et al.
Graphs and Hypergraphs
,
2022
.
[7]
Fan Chung Graham,et al.
Diameter bounds for altered graphs
,
1984,
J. Graph Theory.