Optimization of Integral Knowledge, Innovation and Technologies Cluster Structure

The paper describes the search for an answer to the question – how the structure of knowledge, innovation and technologies’ cluster should be formed, when the structure is understood as a set of interacting components of the system and when the object or even functions of the cluster change from being a resource for the object, process or system development, the cluster further becomes the technology of adaptive complex system. The authors synthesize the existing opinions and also reveal their own opinion about the possibility to reveal the interaction among knowledge, innovation and technologies in the context of value creation or resource management, when the object of the cluster becomes the project of country universally sustainable development. In turn, the cluster will be perceived as the sum total of subjects, the main functions of which are intended for the cognition and realization of management possibilities of certain object, process or system. This paper presents the original evaluation performed by the authors in order to optimally allocate the investment resources for knowledge, innovation and technologies among distinctive subsystems of universally sustainable development, as well as to optimally allocate the investment resources inside the cluster among the creation and development of knowledge, innovation and technologies. Using the possibilities of stochastic informative expertise, the experimental distribution of the marginal unit among the components of universally sustainable development has been carried out, which would give the maximum growth of country sustainability index, measuring it by the adequate composition of development components, and experimental distribution of the marginal unit in the cluster among knowledge, innovation and technologies would give the maximum growth of cluster integral functionality.

[1]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The economics of innovation: from the classical legacies to the economics of complexity , 2009 .

[2]  Stijn Viaene,et al.  Linking technology intelligence to open innovation , 2010 .

[3]  Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas,et al.  Integrated knowledge, innovation and technology cluster as a self-regulating complex system , 2013 .

[4]  B. Johansson,et al.  Innovation, Technology and Knowledge , 2011 .

[5]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Appropriate growth policy: a unifying framework , 2006 .

[6]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher Technology Change , 2010 .

[7]  Vichita Vathanophas,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition: The Roles of Perceived Value of Knowledge Content and Source , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Knowledge and innovation: The strings between global and local dimensions of sustainable growth , 2009 .

[9]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries , 2000 .

[10]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Science cited in patents: A geographic "flow" analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents , 2003, Scientometrics.

[11]  Charles M Camic,et al.  Social knowledge in the making , 2011 .

[12]  Dinar Kale,et al.  Flows and Cohesion: Balancing Capabilities Across an Expanded Union1 , 2007 .

[13]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .

[14]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Mapping The Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth In A Panel Of OECD Industries , 2000 .

[15]  Tong Yang,et al.  The Cultivation of Cluster’s Sustainable Competence Based on Knowledge Management , 2009 .

[16]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  Productivity and growth , 1994 .

[17]  Matthew R. Marvel,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition, Network Reliance, and Early‐Stage Technology Venture Outcomes , 2011 .

[18]  C. Häussler,et al.  Inter-Firm Collaboration , 2005 .

[19]  Torgeir Dingsøyr,et al.  Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used , 2008, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[20]  M. Alam,et al.  Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability: Empirical Evidence from East and South-East Asia , 2013 .

[21]  G. Năstase,et al.  Innovative Models of Increasing Competition and Competitiveness in Science , 2013 .

[22]  Shiu-Li Huang,et al.  Designing a semantic bliki system to support different types of knowledge and adaptive learning , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Aleksandras Vytautas Rutkauskas,et al.  Sustainabilities Portfolio as System to envisage and manage Universal Sustainability , 2011 .

[24]  Luan Carlos Santos Silva,et al.  Technology Transfer and Knowledge Management in Technological Innovation Center: A Case Study in Brazil , 2013 .

[25]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Is Europe Becoming the Most Dynamic Knowledge Economy in the World? , 2005 .

[26]  Alexander Kaufmann,et al.  Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions , 2008 .

[27]  Stefano Scarpetta,et al.  Regulation, Productivity and Growth: OECD Evidence , 2003 .

[28]  B. Nooteboom.  Inter-Firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: An Integrated Approach , 2003 .