Analysis of Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in living cells

Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signalling leads to phosphorylation and activation of receptor-regulated Smad2 and Smad3, which form complexes with Smad4 and accumulate in the nucleus. The Smads, however, do not seem to reside statically in the cytoplasm in the absence of signalling or in the nucleus upon TGF-β stimulation, but have been suggested to shuttle continuously between these cellular compartments in both the absence and presence of TGF-β. Here we investigate this nucleocytoplasmic shuttling in detail in living cells using fusions of Smad2 and Smad4 with enhanced GFP. We first establish that the GFPSmad fusions behave like wild-type Smads in a variety of cellular assays. We go on to demonstrate directly, using photobleaching experiments, that Smad2 and Smad4 shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus in both TGF-β-induced cells and in uninduced cells. In uninduced cells, GFPSmad2 is less mobile in the cytoplasm than is GFPSmad4, suggesting that it may be tethered there. In addition, we show that both GFPSmad2 and GFPSmad4 undergo a substantial decrease in mobility in the nucleus upon TGF-β stimulation, suggesting that active complexes of Smads are tethered in the nucleus, whereas unactivated Smads are more freely diffusible. We propose that regulated cytoplasmic and nuclear retention may play a role in determining the distribution of Smads between the cytoplasm and the nucleus in both uninduced cells and upon TGF-β induction.

[1]  Harvey F Lodish,et al.  An extended bipartite nuclear localization signal in Smad4 is required for its nuclear import and transcriptional activity , 2003, Oncogene.

[2]  J. Massagué,et al.  Mechanisms of TGF-β Signaling from Cell Membrane to the Nucleus , 2003, Cell.

[3]  Jian-ming Li,et al.  Smad3-Smad4 and AP-1 Complexes Synergize in Transcriptional Activation of the c-Jun Promoter by Transforming Growth Factor β , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[4]  Kathleen R. Cho,et al.  DPC4 gene in various tumor types. , 1996, Cancer research.

[5]  P. Dijke,et al.  The FYVE domain in Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA) is sufficient for localization of SARA in early endosomes and regulates TGF‐β/Smad signalling , 2002, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[6]  A. Chawla,et al.  TGFβ receptor internalization into EEA1-enriched early endosomes , 2002, The Journal of Cell Biology.

[7]  Claudio Alarcón,et al.  Distinct Domain Utilization by Smad3 and Smad4 for Nucleoporin Interaction and Nuclear Import* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  George H Patterson,et al.  Photobleaching and photoactivation: following protein dynamics in living cells. , 2003, Nature cell biology.

[9]  Jian-ming Li,et al.  Smad 3-Smad 4 and AP-1 Complexes Synergize in Transcriptional Activation of the c-Jun Promoter by Transforming Growth Factor b , 1999 .

[10]  G. Hager,et al.  Dynamic Shuttling and Intranuclear Mobility of Nuclear Hormone Receptors* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Tomoki Chiba,et al.  Smurf1 Interacts with Transforming Growth Factor-β Type I Receptor through Smad7 and Induces Receptor Degradation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  U. Kutay,et al.  Transport between the cell nucleus and the cytoplasm. , 1999, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[13]  Xin-Hua Feng,et al.  Microtubule Binding to Smads May Regulate TGFβ Activity , 2000 .

[14]  J. Cidlowski,et al.  Importance of Ligand Affinity Receptor Mobility in Living Cells : the Molecular Determinants of Glucocorticoid , 2003 .

[15]  H. Lodish,et al.  Importin β Mediates Nuclear Translocation of Smad 3* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  I. Kerr,et al.  STAT1 from the cell membrane to the DNA , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[17]  C. Hill,et al.  Attenuation of the TGF-β-Smad signaling pathway in pancreatic tumor cells confers resistance to TGF-β-induced growth arrest , 2003, Oncogene.

[18]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[19]  H. Lodish,et al.  A distinct nuclear localization signal in the N terminus of Smad 3 determines its ligand-induced nuclear translocation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Peter J. Parker,et al.  Imaging Protein Kinase Cα Activation in Cells , 1999 .

[21]  B. Olson,et al.  Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor (TGF)- 1–Induced Extracellular Matrix with a Novel Inhibitor of the TGF- Type I Receptor Kinase Activity: SB-431542 , 2002 .

[22]  Cem Elbi,et al.  Protein dynamics in the nuclear compartment. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[23]  P. Dijke,et al.  New insights into TGF-β–Smad signalling , 2004 .

[24]  Jeffrey L. Wrana,et al.  Distinct endocytic pathways regulate TGF-β receptor signalling and turnover , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  R. Treisman,et al.  The POZ domain: a conserved protein-protein interaction motif. , 1994, Genes & development.

[26]  C. Heldin,et al.  Transforming growth factor-beta induces nuclear import of Smad3 in an importin-beta1 and Ran-dependent manner. , 2001, Molecular biology of the cell.

[27]  A. Reith,et al.  SB-431542 is a potent and specific inhibitor of transforming growth factor-beta superfamily type I activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) receptors ALK4, ALK5, and ALK7. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[28]  I. Macara,et al.  Facilitated Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of the Ran Binding Protein RanBP1 , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  B. Matthews,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of β-galactosidase from E. coli. , 1994, Nature.

[30]  James G McNally,et al.  Dynamic behavior of transcription factors on a natural promoter in living cells , 2002, EMBO reports.

[31]  Teresa Reguly,et al.  In or out? The dynamics of Smad nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[32]  M Whitman,et al.  Endogenous patterns of TGFbeta superfamily signaling during early Xenopus development. , 2000, Development.

[33]  J. Massagué,et al.  The nuclear import function of Smad2 is masked by SARA and unmasked by TGFb-dependent phosphorylation , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[34]  Denis Vivien,et al.  Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGFβ‐inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor‐type 1 gene , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[35]  J. Wrana,et al.  Smad7 binds to Smurf2 to form an E3 ubiquitin ligase that targets the TGF beta receptor for degradation. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[36]  J. Massagué,et al.  Smad2 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling by nucleoporins CAN/Nup214 and Nup153 feeds TGFbeta signaling complexes in the cytoplasm and nucleus. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[37]  S. Germain,et al.  Homeodomain and winged-helix transcription factors recruit activated Smads to distinct promoter elements via a common Smad interaction motif. , 2000, Genes & development.

[38]  T. Pederson,et al.  Protein Mobility within the Nucleus—What Are the Right Moves? , 2001, Cell.

[39]  C. Hill,et al.  Molecular and functional consequences of Smad4 C-terminal missense mutations in colorectal tumour cells. , 2004, The Biochemical journal.

[40]  C. Hill,et al.  Transforming Growth Factor β-Independent Shuttling of Smad4 between the Cytoplasm and Nucleus , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[41]  C. Hill,et al.  Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of Smads 2, 3, and 4 permits sensing of TGF-beta receptor activity. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[42]  C. Hill,et al.  Stoichiometry of Active Smad-Transcription Factor Complexes on DNA* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  P. Herrlich,et al.  12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate induction of the human collagenase gene is mediated by an inducible enhancer element located in the 5'-flanking region , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[44]  Liliana Attisano,et al.  SARA, a FYVE Domain Protein that Recruits Smad2 to the TGFβ Receptor , 1998, Cell.

[45]  E. Nishida,et al.  Regulation of intracellular dynamics of Smad4 by its leucine‐rich nuclear export signal , 2000, EMBO reports.

[46]  S. Murphy,et al.  Cell-Type-Specific Activation of PAK2 by Transforming Growth Factor β Independent of Smad2 and Smad3 , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.