Varying-parameter modeling within ensemble architecture: Application to extended streamflow forecasting

Abstract Extended streamflow forecasting is nowadays important for early flood warning and risk mitigation under a changing climate. However, the absence of reliable estimates of the usual streamflow descriptors, at the considered time horizons, renders common input–output modeling approaches inapt for extended forecasting. For such a problem, system recurrence information is vital to produce relatively improved forecasts. Like any time series generated by complex systems, river flow can be represented by a time-varying parameter (TVP) model. TVP modeling frameworks often assume that the system evolution exhibits superstatistical random walks, and a number of statistical assumptions is followed upon, to infer better forecasts from the system. Also, the TVPs should hone a model's ability to capture system recurrence, which in this case translates to a number of state-based model structures. In this work, we develop an ensemble-based computationally efficient method that extracts useful cyclic-type TVPs which are strongly coupled over extended, but more continuous and less aggregated, time horizons. A multi-level modeling framework is proposed to facilitate the creation and direct use of updated parameter states to produce more reliable forecasts on the considered temporal resolutions. A dummy-variable optimization technique is also proposed within the state-updating procedure to allow smooth state transition. We show that the modeling framework produces stable results of parameter variations at different time horizons when applied to estimate the streamflow of Clearwater River. The proposed framework can incorporate exogenous descriptors at different levels without loss of generality and can be used for various forecasting applications.

[1]  Bassam Bamieh,et al.  Identification of linear parameter varying models , 2002 .

[2]  Mats Viberg,et al.  Subspace-based methods for the identification of linear time-invariant systems , 1995, Autom..

[3]  Georgios B. Giannakis,et al.  Time-varying system identification and model validation using wavelets , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  Zaher Mundher Yaseen,et al.  Application of the Hybrid Artificial Neural Network Coupled with Rolling Mechanism and Grey Model Algorithms for Streamflow Forecasting Over Multiple Time Horizons , 2018, Water Resources Management.

[5]  Giorgio Picci,et al.  Realization of stochastic systems with exogenous inputs and subspace identification methods , 1999, Autom..

[6]  Vincent Verdult,et al.  Kernel methods for subspace identification of multivariable LPV and bilinear systems , 2005, Autom..

[7]  Bethanna Jackson,et al.  Constraining the ensemble Kalman filter for improved streamflow forecasting , 2016 .

[8]  Peter M. Atkinson,et al.  Flood inundation model updating using an ensemble Kalman filter and spatially distributed measurements , 2007 .

[9]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some statistics useful in regional frequency analysis , 1993 .

[10]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[11]  Barry F. W. Croke,et al.  Evaluation of streamflow predictions by the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model in two South African catchments , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  Mohamed A. Meguid,et al.  Predicting seismic-induced liquefaction through ensemble learning frameworks , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Β. L. HO,et al.  Editorial: Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output functions , 1966 .

[14]  M. Gevers,et al.  Stable adaptive observers for nonlinear time-varying systems , 1987 .

[15]  O. Kisi,et al.  Short-term and long-term streamflow forecasting using a wavelet and neuro-fuzzy conjunction model , 2010 .

[16]  Amir F. Atiya,et al.  A comparison between neural-network forecasting techniques-case study: river flow forecasting , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[17]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[18]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory ― Implementation ― Applications , 2011 .

[19]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-Loop Subspace Identification with Innovation Estimation , 2003 .

[20]  Tomás Pajdla,et al.  Neighbourhood Consensus Networks , 2018, NeurIPS.

[21]  Shaocheng Tong,et al.  Adaptive Controller Design-Based ABLF for a Class of Nonlinear Time-Varying State Constraint Systems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[22]  María Concepción Ausín,et al.  Time‐varying nonstationary multivariate risk analysis using a dynamic Bayesian copula , 2016 .

[23]  Henrik Madsen,et al.  Seasonal streamflow forecasts in the Ahlergaarde catchment, Denmark: the effect of preprocessing and post-processing on skill and statistical consistency , 2017, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[24]  T. Ouarda,et al.  Generalized maximum likelihood estimators for the nonstationary generalized extreme value model , 2007 .

[25]  H. Akaike Stochastic theory of minimal realization , 1974 .