Use of Pitch and Heave Motion Cues in a Pitch Control Task

During pitch rotation of the aircraft, a pilot, seated in front of the aircraft center of gravity, is subjected to rotational pitch and vertical heave motion. The heave motion is a combination of the vertical motion of the aircraft center of gravity and the heave motion as a result of the pitch rotation. In a pitch tracking task, all of these cues could potentially have a positive effect on performance and control behavior, as they are all related to the aircraft pitch attitude. To improve the tuning of flight simulator motion filters, a better understanding of how these motion components are used by the pilot is required. First, the optimal use of the different motion components was evaluated using an optimal control analysis. Next, an aircraft pitch attitude control experiment was performed in the SIMONA Research Simulator, investigating the effects of pitch rotation, pitch heave, and center of gravity heave on pilot control behavior. Pilot performance significantly improved with pitch motion, with an increased crossover frequency for the disturbance open loop. The increase in performance was a result of an increased visual gain and a reduction in visual lead, allowed for by the addition of pitch motion. Pitch heave motion showed similar but smaller effects. The center of gravity heave motion, although taking up most of the simulator motion space, was found to have no significant effects on performance and control behavior.

[1]  Max Mulder,et al.  Pilot's Use of Heave Cues in a Pitch Control Task , 2007 .

[2]  Duane T. McRuer,et al.  A Review of Quasi-Linear Pilot Models , 1967 .

[3]  Ruud Hosman,et al.  Effect of Simulator Motion on Pilot Behavior and Perception , 2006 .

[4]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  Helicopter flight simulation motion platform requirements , 1998 .

[5]  Max Mulder,et al.  Effects of Aeroelasticity on the Pilot's Psychomotor Behavior , 2006 .

[6]  M. Mulder,et al.  Role Identification of Yaw and Sway Motion in Helicopter Yaw Control Tasks , 2008 .

[7]  J. V. D. Vaart,et al.  Modelling of perception and action in compensatory manual control tasks , 1992 .

[8]  Max Mulder,et al.  A Cybernetic Approach to Assess Flight Simulator Fidelity , 2004 .

[9]  Max Mulder,et al.  Effects of Peripheral Visual and Physical Motion Cues in Roll-Axis Tracking Tasks , 2008 .

[10]  L. D. Reid,et al.  Flight simulation motion-base drive algorithms: part 1. Developing and testing equations , 1985 .

[11]  F R Alex,et al.  Experiments and a model for pilot dynamics with visual and motion inputs. NASA CR-1325. , 1969, NASA contractor report. NASA CR. United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[12]  Max Mulder,et al.  Measuring the Performance of the SIMONA Research Simulator's Motion System , 2005 .

[13]  A. M. Junker,et al.  Roll tracking effects of G-vector tilt and various types of motion washout , 1978 .

[14]  Max Mulder,et al.  Modeling Human Multichannel Perception and Control Using Linear Time-Invariant Models , 2008 .

[15]  Max Mulder,et al.  The Effects of Simulator Motion Filter Settings on Pilot Manual Control Behaviour , 2006 .

[16]  Duane T. McRuer.  HUMAN PILOT DYNAMICS IN COMPENSATORY SYSTEMS , 1965 .

[17]  R Hosman,et al.  Pilot's perception in the control of aircraft motions. , 1998, Control engineering practice.

[18]  Max Mulder,et al.  Conducting multi-modal pilot model identification - Results of a simulator experiment , 2007 .

[19]  L. R. Young,et al.  Influence of combined visual and vestibular cues on human perception and control of horizontal rotation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  M. M. van Paassen,et al.  Perception of Visual and Motion Cues During Control of Self-Motion in Optic Flow Environments , 2006 .