Water uptake by pearl millet in a semiarid environment

Crops during drought may not utilize water at depth. This under-utilization of deep water may result from slow rates of root extension, low root density, or a decline in soil water potential or associated phenomena. The importance of several of these factors on pearlmillet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br., cv. CIVT) wateruptake and growth from panicle initiation to flowering was studied on a sandy soil in northern Nigeria during two dry seasons. Half of the crop was irrigated while the other half received no water after panicle initiation. Soil water content, stomatal conductance and stem extension were measured periodically. A potential-driven wateruptake model, which assumes a static, exponential distribution of roots and couples transpiration to leaf water potentials, described in both seasons the observed pattern and timing of wateruptake, as well as predawn leaf water potential and actual transpiration. As the soil dried, estimated transpiration declined below potential transpiration and modeled and measured predawn leaf water potential declined. There was close agreement between observed and modeled predawn leaf water potential and soil wateruptake. Analysis using the model indicated that decreased wateruptake at depth was attributable to root distribution throughout the soil profile, as well as to low root length density at depth

[1]  P. Barraclough,et al.  Effects of a compacted subsoil layer on root and shoot growth, water use and nutrient uptake of winter wheat , 1988, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[2]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Water extraction by grain sorghum in a sub-humid environment. I. Analysis of the water extraction pattern , 1993 .

[3]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  A model of water flow through plants incorporating shoot/root ‘message’ control of stomatal conductance , 1991 .

[4]  J. Kowal,et al.  An agroclimatological atlas of the northern states of Nigeria : with explanatory notes , 1972 .

[5]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Water extraction by grain sorghum in a sub-humid environment. II. Extraction in relation to root growth , 1993 .

[6]  W. E. Splinter,et al.  A Simplified Model of Corn Growth under Moisture Stress , 1977 .

[7]  D. Tennant,et al.  Root length density and water uptake in cereals and grain legumes: how well are they correlated , 1987 .

[8]  I. R. Cowan Transport of Water in the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere System , 1965 .

[9]  J. Passioura,et al.  Roots and drought resistance , 1983 .

[10]  E. R. Page,et al.  An empirical mathematical model to describe plant root systems , 1974 .

[11]  R. Munns,et al.  Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leaves , 1986 .

[12]  F. Miller,et al.  Genetic variability in sorghum root systems: implication for drought tolerance. , 1980 .

[13]  K. Leuven Book reviewTransport models for soil-plant systems: by G.S. Campbell. Soil Physics with Basic series, Elsevier Science Publishers, P.O. Box 330, 1000 AH Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986, xvi+150 pp., US$41.50/Dfl. 120.00, Diskette, US$31.00/Dfl.90.00, ISBN: 0-444-42557-8 , 1987 .

[14]  D. J. Flower,et al.  Temperature and soil water status effects on radiation use and growth of pearl millet in a semi-arid environment , 1993 .

[15]  Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.  A simulation model for predicting effect of water stress on yield: an example using corn , 1985 .

[16]  D. Charles-Edwards,et al.  An Analysis of the Effects of Repeated Short-Term Soil Water Deficits on Stomatal Conductance to Carbon Dioxide and Leaf Photosynthesis by the Legume Macroptilium atropurpureum Cv. Siratro , 1981 .

[17]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress , 1980 .

[18]  Holger Meinke,et al.  Potential soil water extraction by sunflower on a range of soils , 1993 .

[19]  W. R. Gardner,et al.  Dynamic Aspects of Soil-Water Availability to Plants , 1965 .

[20]  Susan J. Riha,et al.  Water fluxes in oxisols: A comparison of approaches , 1992 .