Binding and diffusion of CheR molecules within a cluster of membrane receptors.

Adaptation of the attractant response in Escherichia coli is attributable to the methylation of its transmembrane chemotactic receptors by the methyltransferase CheR. This protein contains two binding domains, one for the sites of methylation themselves and the other for a flexible tether at the C terminus of the receptor. We have explored the theoretical consequences of this binding geometry for a CheR molecule associated with a cluster of chemotactic receptors. Calculations show that the CheR molecule will bind with high net affinity to the receptor lattice, having a high probability of being attached by one or both of its domains at any instant of time. Because of the relatively low affinity of its individual domains and the close proximity of neighboring receptors, it is likely that when one domain unbinds it will reattach to the array before the other domain unbinds. Stochastic simulations show that the enzyme will move through the receptor cluster in a hand-over-hand fashion, like a gibbon swinging through the branches of a tree. We explore the possible consequences of this motion, which we term "molecular brachiation", for chemotactic adaptation and suggest that a similar mechanism may be operative in other large assemblies of protein molecules.

[1]  Jason E. Gestwicki,et al.  Evolutionary Conservation of Methyl-Accepting Chemotaxis Protein Location in Bacteria andArchaea , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Location of the Receptor-interaction Site on CheB, the Methylesterase Response Regulator of Bacterial Chemotaxis* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  H. Erickson,et al.  Kinetics of protein-protein association explained by Brownian dynamics computer simulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  J. Falke,et al.  Signaling domain of the aspartate receptor is a helical hairpin with a localized kinase docking surface: cysteine and disulfide scanning studies. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[5]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  High- and low-abundance chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli: differential activities associated with closely related cytoplasmic domains , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  Gerald L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Sensory Transduction in Bacterila Chemotaxis , 1983 .

[7]  D E Koshland,et al.  Kinetics of receptor modification. The multiply methylated aspartate receptors involved in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Sensory transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1983, International review of cytology.

[9]  J. Stock,et al.  Purification and characterization of the S-adenosylmethionine:glutamyl methyltransferase that modifies membrane chemoreceptor proteins in bacteria. , 1987, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  S. Lowen The Biophysical Journal , 1960, Nature.

[11]  M. Homma,et al.  The aspartate chemoreceptor Tar is effectively methylated by binding to the methyltransferase mainly through hydrophobic interaction , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[12]  P. Flory,et al.  The Configuration of Random Polypeptide Chains. I. Experimental Results , 1965 .

[13]  Stephan C. Schuster,et al.  Assembly and function of a quaternary signal transduction complex monitored by surface plasmon resonance , 1993, Nature.

[14]  M. Surette,et al.  Receptor‐mediated protein kinase activation and the mechanism of transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemotaxis , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[15]  K. Subbaramaiah,et al.  The kinetic mechanism of S-adenosyl-L-methionine: glutamylmethyltransferase from Salmonella typhimurium. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[16]  D. Koshland,et al.  Methylation of the Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptors: intra- and interdimer mechanisms. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[17]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor , 1999, Nature.

[18]  D E Koshland,et al.  Molecular evolution of the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of a superfamily of bacterial receptors involved in taxis. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[20]  I. Zhulin,et al.  The superfamily of chemotaxis transducers: from physiology to genomics and back. , 2001, Advances in microbial physiology.

[21]  M. Manson,et al.  Chimeric Chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli: Signaling Properties of Tar-Tap and Tap-Tar Hybrids , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Polar location of the chemoreceptor complex in the Escherichia coli cell. , 1993, Science.

[23]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[24]  M. Sandgren,et al.  Chemotaxis receptors: a progress report on structure and function. , 1998, Journal of structural biology.

[25]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Chemotaxis receptor recognition by protein methyltransferase CheR , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[26]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Efficient adaptational demethylation of chemoreceptors requires the same enzyme-docking site as efficient methylation. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Frederick W. Dahlquist,et al.  Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway , 1992, Cell.

[28]  P. Flory,et al.  The Configuration of Random Polypeptide Chains. II. Theory , 1965 .

[29]  B. Müller-Hill,et al.  High local protein concentrations at promoters: strategies in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. , 2001, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[30]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  C. J.,et al.  Predicting Temporal Fluctuations in an Intracellular Signalling Pathway , 1998 .

[32]  D. Koshland,et al.  Molecular cloning of chemotaxis genes and overproduction of gene products in the bacterial sensing system , 1981, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  A. Bren,et al.  How Signals Are Heard during Bacterial Chemotaxis: Protein-Protein Interactions in Sensory Signal Propagation , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[34]  Ann M Stock,et al.  Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine. , 1997, Structure.

[35]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Relaxation kinetics of biological dimer adsorption models , 2001, cond-mat/0108285.

[36]  R. Weis,et al.  The serine chemoreceptor from Escherichia coli is methylated through an inter-dimer process. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[37]  J P Armitage,et al.  Bacterial tactic responses. , 1999, Advances in microbial physiology.

[38]  Nicolas Le Novère,et al.  STOCHSIM: modelling of stochastic biomolecular processes , 2001, Bioinform..

[39]  B C Lagerholm,et al.  Theory for ligand rebinding at cell membrane surfaces. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[40]  A. Borczuk,et al.  Demethylation of bacterial chemoreceptors is inhibited by attractant stimuli in the complete absence of the regulatory domain of the demethylating enzyme. , 1986, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[41]  R. Weis,et al.  The receptor binding site for the methyltransferase of bacterial chemotaxis is distinct from the sites of methylation. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[42]  J C Wootton,et al.  The Q-linker: a class of interdomain sequences found in bacterial multidomain regulatory proteins. , 1989, Protein engineering.

[43]  S. Chervitz,et al.  The two-component signaling pathway of bacterial chemotaxis: a molecular view of signal transduction by receptors, kinases, and adaptation enzymes. , 1997, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[44]  S Vajda,et al.  Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein-protein binding. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[45]  M. Homma,et al.  Chemotactic Adaptation Is Altered by Changes in the Carboxy-Terminal Sequence Conserved among the Major Methyl-Accepting Chemoreceptors , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  D. Koshland,et al.  Interactions between the Methylation Sites of the Escherichia coli Aspartate Receptor Mediated by the Methyltransferase (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[47]  Jason E. Gestwicki,et al.  Motility and Chemotaxis of Filamentous Cells ofEscherichia coli , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[48]  P. Matsumura,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis signaling complexes: formation of a CheA/CheW complex enhances autophosphorylation and affinity for CheY. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. Stock,et al.  Multiple forms of the CheB methylesterase in bacterial chemosensing. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[50]  L. Timpe,et al.  A random flight chain model for the tether of the Shaker K+ channel inactivation domain. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[51]  T Hoshi,et al.  Biophysical and molecular mechanisms of Shaker potassium channel inactivation , 1990, Science.

[52]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Enhanced Function Conferred on Low-Abundance Chemoreceptor Trg by a Methyltransferase-Docking Site , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[53]  Receptor interactions through phosphorylation and methylation pathways in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.