Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.

Despite the clear importance of team creativity for organizations, the conditions that foster it are not very well understood. Even though diversity, especially diversity of perspectives and knowledge, is frequently argued to stimulate higher creativity in teams, empirical findings on this relationship remain inconsistent. We have developed a theoretical model in which the effect of a team's diversity on its creativity is moderated by the degree to which team members engage in perspective taking. We propose that perspective taking helps realize the creative benefits of diversity of perspectives by fostering information elaboration. Results of a laboratory experiment support the hypothesized interaction between diversity and perspective taking on team creativity. Diverse teams performed more creatively than homogeneous teams when they engaged in perspective taking, but not when they were not instructed to take their team members' perspectives. Team information elaboration was found to mediate this moderated effect and was associated with a stronger indirect effect than mere information sharing or task conflict. Our results point to perspective taking as an important mechanism to unlock diversity's potential for team creativity.

[1]  Gregory Gull.  The Effects are Personal , 2013 .

[2]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance , 2012 .

[3]  Jeong-Yeon Lee,et al.  Cognitive Team Diversity and Individual Team Member Creativity: A Cross-Level Interaction , 2012 .

[4]  Bradley R. Staats,et al.  Dynamically Integrating Knowledge in Teams: Transforming Resources into Performance , 2011 .

[5]  J. Dawson,et al.  Diversity faultlines, shared objectives, and top management team performance , 2011 .

[6]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: A review of different approaches to creativity research. , 2011 .

[7]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  The Bias Against Creativity: Why People Desire but Reject Creative Ideas , 2011 .

[8]  S. Jackson,et al.  Work team diversity. , 2011 .

[9]  Ramesh K. Agarwal,et al.  A MODEL OF CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2011 .

[10]  H. Park,et al.  Perspective Taking and Communication Satisfaction in Coworker Dyads , 2010 .

[11]  Erik Dane.  Reconsidering the Trade-off Between Expertise and Flexibility: a Cognitive Entrenchment Perspective , 2010 .

[12]  Understanding perspective taking and its role in relation to teamworking and diversity , 2010 .

[13]  J. Farh,et al.  Task conflict and team creativity: a question of how much and when. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Siobhan O’Mahony,et al.  Nexus Work: Brokerage on Creative Projects , 2010 .

[15]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  EFFICACY DISPERSION IN TEAMS: MOVING BEYOND AGREEMENT AND AGGREGATION , 2010 .

[16]  Elizabeth George,et al.  APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2010 .

[17]  S. Voelpel,et al.  WHEN AND HOW DIVERSITY BENEFITS TEAMS: THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM MEMBERS' NEED FOR COGNITION , 2009 .

[18]  Aparna Joshi,et al.  The Role Of Context In Work Team Diversity Research: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2009 .

[19]  R. Korte,et al.  Engaged scholarship: a guide for organizational and social research , 2009 .

[20]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making : When and why does it work? , 2009 .

[21]  Ute R. Hülsheger,et al.  Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: the promise of transformational leadership. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Facing differences with an open mind: Openness to experience, salience of intra-group differences, and performance of diverse work groups , 2008 .

[24]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Brian T. Gregory,et al.  Perspective taking and transformational leadership: Working paper series--08-07 , 2008 .

[26]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  Building better work places through individual perspective taking: A fresh look at a fundamental human process , 2008 .

[27]  D. Knippenberg,et al.  Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations , 2008 .

[28]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[29]  Aleksander P. J. Ellis,et al.  Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: is activation the key? , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  J. George.  9 Creativity in Organizations , 2007 .

[31]  Jing Zhou,et al.  When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Perceived Dissimilarity and Perspective Taking Within Work Teams , 2007 .

[33]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[34]  L. Weingart,et al.  Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams , 2007 .

[35]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  Enhancing customer service: Perspective taking in a call centre , 2007 .

[36]  Roland Castellanos.  A Qualitative Analysis of Conflict Types and Dimensions in Organizational Groups , 2007 .

[37]  J. Edwards,et al.  Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[38]  D. van Knippenberg,et al.  Work group diversity. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  SEEING ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE TAKING , 2001 .

[41]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research , 2007 .

[42]  Daniel J. Bauer,et al.  Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis , 2006 .

[43]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[44]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams , 2006 .

[45]  K. W. Phillips,et al.  When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members , 2006 .

[46]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Team diversity and information use , 2005 .

[47]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDUCTING MULTI-LEVEL CONSTRUCT VALIDATION , 2005 .

[48]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[50]  David A. Thomas,et al.  Diversity as strategy. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[51]  Gillian Ku,et al.  The Effects of Perspective-Taking on Prejudice: The Moderating Role of Self-Evaluation , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[52]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly of Perspective Taking in Groups , 2004 .

[53]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  Frances J. Milliken,et al.  Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. , 2003 .

[55]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Group creativity : An introduction , 2003 .

[56]  Steven M. Smith.  The constraining effects of initial ideas. , 2003 .

[57]  Vincent R. Brown,et al.  Making Group Brainstorming More Effective: Recommendations From an Associative Memory Perspective , 2002 .

[58]  Joseph T. Banas,et al.  Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects , 2002 .

[59]  M. West.  Sparkling Fountains or Stagnant Ponds: An Integrative Model of Creativity and Innovation Implementation in Work Groups , 2002 .

[60]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Integrating Knowledge in Groups: How Formal Interventions Enable Flexibility , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[62]  Simon Taggar,et al.  Group Composition, Creative Synergy, and Group Performance , 2001 .

[63]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  From Guilford to Creative Synergy: Opening the Black Box of Team-Level Creativity , 2001 .

[64]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality , 2001 .

[65]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[66]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[67]  Philip A. Titus.  Marketing and the Creative Problem-Solving Process , 2000 .

[68]  Christian Nagel.  Cognitive load and perspective‐taking: applying the automatic‐controlled distinction to verbal communication , 2000 .

[69]  P. Paulus.  Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups , 2000 .

[70]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2000 .

[71]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[72]  Andrew Harley,et al.  Cambridge Dictionaries Online , 2000 .

[73]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Perspective-taking: decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[74]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[75]  K. Jehn.  A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[76]  Franklin J. Boster,et al.  The Impact of Group Size and Proportion of Shared Information on the Exchange and Integration of Information in Groups , 1997 .

[77]  P. McLeod,et al.  Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups , 1996 .

[78]  Valerie I. Sessa,et al.  Using Perspective Taking to Manage Conflict and Affect in Teams , 1996 .

[79]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[80]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[81]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[82]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Perspective-Taking in Communication: Representations of Others' Knowledge in Reference , 1991 .

[83]  Susan E. Jackson,et al.  Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. , 1991 .

[84]  Thomas H. Thornburg.  Creativity in organizations , 1988 .

[85]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[86]  R. Baron,et al.  Negative effects of destructive criticism: impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[87]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[88]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[89]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[90]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[91]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[92]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .

[93]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[94]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Controversy within a cooperative or competitive context and cognitive perspective-taking , 1978 .

[95]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Effects of controversy on cognitive perspective taking. , 1977 .

[96]  L. A. Kurdek,et al.  Perceptual, cognitive, and affective perspective taking in kindergarten through sixth-grade children. , 1975 .