The Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment on the Relationships between P–O Fit, Job Satisfaction, and In-role Performance

PurposeThe direct relationships between person–organization fit (P–O fit) and multiple individual-level outcomes such as job satisfaction and in-role performance have been heavily studied in the extant literature; potential mediators of these relationships have been studied much less frequently. Consequently, a complete picture of the psychology surrounding P–O fit is missing. This research aims to begin to fill this gap in the literature.Design/methodology/approachA sample of university faculty and staff with supervisor-rated performance feedback is used to examine the potential mediating role of psychological empowerment on these established relationships.FindingsResults from this sample indicate that psychological empowerment mediates the relationship between P–O fit and in-role performance, as well as between P–O fit and job satisfaction.ImplicationsThese results imply that an individual’s perceived fit in their organization impacts their perceptions of management practices which, in turn, influences important behaviors and attitudes toward work.Originality/valueStudy findings begin to explain how P–O fit impacts employee attitudes and behaviors. Specifically, we find that individual cognitions regarding impact and self-determination appear to be two factors that explain the relationship between P–O fit and job satisfaction as well as the relationship between P–O fit and in-role performance.

[1]  M. Sobel Direct and Indirect Effects in Linear Structural Equation Models , 1987 .

[2]  T. Judge,et al.  Person–Organization Fit and the Theory of Work Adjustment: Implications for Satisfaction, Tenure, and Career Success , 1994 .

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Robert E. Quinn,et al.  Empowered to lead: the role of psychological empowerment in leadership , 1999 .

[6]  L. J. Williams,et al.  Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors , 1991 .

[7]  A. Kristof-brown,et al.  CONSEQUENCES OF INDIVIDUALS' FIT AT WORK: A META-ANALYSIS OF PERSON-JOB, PERSON-ORGANIZATION, PERSON-GROUP, AND PERSON-SUPERVISOR FIT , 2005 .

[8]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  Relationships between Person-Environment Congruence and Organizational Effectiveness , 1993 .

[9]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[10]  Philip H. Mirvis,et al.  Assessing organizational change : a guide to methods, measures, and practices , 1984 .

[11]  E. Schein Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[12]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  Psychological Empowerment as a Multidimensional Construct: A Test of Construct Validity , 1999 .

[13]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Person–Organization Fit, Job Choice Decisions, and Organizational Entry☆ , 1996 .

[15]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  A meta-analysis of relations between person–organization fit and work attitudes , 2003 .

[16]  Stanley G. Harris,et al.  Organizational Culture and Individual Sensemaking: A Schema-Based Perspective , 1994 .

[17]  G. Spreitzer,et al.  A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness Satisfaction, and Strain , 1997 .

[18]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[19]  David J. Woehr,et al.  A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERSON–ORGANIZATION FIT AND BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES , 2006 .

[20]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Common Problems/Proper Solutions. , 1989 .

[21]  Cortlandt Cammann,et al.  Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members , 1983 .

[22]  Amy L. Kristof PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[23]  G. Spreitzer Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[24]  David Chan,et al.  Cognitive Misfit of Problem-Solving Style at Work: A Facet of Person-Organization Fit , 1996 .

[25]  C. Stangor,et al.  Memory for expectancy-congruent and expectancy-incongruent information: A review of the social and social developmental literatures. , 1992 .

[26]  B. Schneider THE PEOPLE MAKE THE PLACE , 1987 .

[27]  Seth R. Silver,et al.  Taking Empowerment to the Next Level: A Multiple-Level Model of Empowerment, Performance, and Satisfaction , 2004 .

[28]  G. Spreitzer PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATION , 1995 .