Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration

Sutherland and Rudy ([1989] Psychobiology 17:129–144) proposed that the hippocampal system is critical to normal learning and memory because of its function as the central part of a configural association system. This system constructs a unique representation of the joint occurrence of the independent elements of a compund. There is evidence consistent with the theory's predictions, however, there also are data that unambiguously demonstrate that, under some conditions, animals lacking an intact hippocampal system acquire configural associations. Thus, Sutherland and Rudy's fundamental assumption cannot be correct. To integrate the supporting and contradictory data, we propose two simple modifications of our position: (1) The critical neural system for configural associations is in cortical circuitry outside the hippocampus, and (2) the output from the hippocampal formation contributes to configural processing by selectively enhancing, thereby making more salient, cortical units representing stimulus conjunctions. This enhancement has two important effects: (1) It decreases the similarity between the configural units representing the co‐occurrence of cues and the units representing the cues, and (2) it increases the rate at which the configural units can acquire associative strength. The modified theory explains why damage to the hippocampal formation only impairs learning on a subset of nonlinear discrimination problems. It also integrates recent data on the effects of hippocampal formation damage on conditioning involving context cues and makes novel predictions about performance on nonlinear discrimination problems and place learning. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  K. Spence The nature of discrimination learning in animals. , 1936 .

[2]  C. B. Woodbury The learning of stimulus patterns by dogs. , 1943 .

[3]  Kenneth W. Spence,et al.  The nature of the response in discrimination learning. , 1952 .

[4]  N Butters,et al.  The role of interference and encoding in the short-term memory deficits of Korsakoff patients. , 1972, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  R. Rescorla "Configural" conditioning in discrete-trial bar pressing. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  A. R. Wagner,et al.  Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configurai components , 1972 .

[7]  E. Warrington,et al.  The effect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients. , 1974, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  R. Hirsh The hippocampus and contextual retrieval of information from memory: a theory. , 1974, Behavioral biology.

[9]  M. A. Saavedra Pavlovian compound conditioning in the rabbit , 1975 .

[10]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. III. Efferent connections , 1975, Brain Research.

[11]  Deepak N. Pandya,et al.  Some connections of the entorhinal (area 28) and perirhinal (area 35) cortices of the rhesus monkey. II. Frontal lobe afferents , 1975, Brain Research.

[12]  Gordon Winocur,et al.  An investigation of paired-associate learning in amnesic patients , 1976, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[14]  G. Handelmann,et al.  Hippocampus, space, and memory , 1979 .

[15]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Chunking and consolidation: A theoretical synthesis of semantic networks configuring in conditioning , 1979 .

[16]  I. Gormezano,et al.  Configuration and combination laws in conditioning with compound stimuli. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[18]  Bryan Kolb,et al.  Spatial mapping: definitive disruption by hippocampal or medial frontal cortical damage in the rat , 1982, Neuroscience Letters.

[19]  G. V. Hoesen,et al.  The parahippocampal gyrus: New observations regarding its cortical connections in the monkey , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[20]  L. Squire,et al.  Human amnesia and the medial temporal region: enduring memory impairment following a bilateral lesion limited to field CA1 of the hippocampus , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Fanselow Associative vs topographical accounts of the immediate shock-freezing deficit in rats: Implications for the response selection rules governing species-specific defensive reactions ☆ , 1986 .

[22]  D. Amaral,et al.  The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[23]  J. Pearce A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. , 1987, Psychological review.

[24]  G. Winocur,et al.  The hippocampus and conditioning to contextual cues. , 1987, Behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  C. Barnes Spatial learning and memory processes: the search for their neurobiological mechanisms in the rat , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia , 1989, Psychobiology.

[27]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Damage to the hippocampal formation in rats selectively impairs the ability to learn cue relationships. , 1989, Behavioral and neural biology.

[28]  M. Packard,et al.  Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  D. Amaral,et al.  The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: A review of anatomical data , 1989, Neuroscience.

[30]  R. Sutherland,et al.  The role of the fornix/fimbria and some related subcortical structures in place learning and memory , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[31]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Different Ways to Cue a Coherent Memory System: A Theory for Episodic, Semantic, and Procedural Tasks. , 1989 .

[32]  Lawrence Weiskrantz,et al.  The effects of fornix transection and combined fornix transection, mammillary body lesions and hippocampal ablations on object-pair association memory in the rhesus monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  R. Sutherland,et al.  The hippocampal formation is necessary for rats to learn and remember configural discriminations , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  R. J. McDonald,et al.  Hippocampus, amygdala, and memory deficits in rats , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[35]  M. Fanselow Factors governing one-trial contextual conditioning , 1990 .

[36]  I Q Whishaw,et al.  Acquisition and retention by hippocampal rats of simple, conditional, and configural tasks using tactile and olfactory cues: implications for hippocampal function. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  L. Jarrard,et al.  On the hippocampus and learned conditional responding: Effects of aspiration versus ibotenate lesions , 1991, Hippocampus.

[38]  T. Robbins,et al.  Complementary roles for the amygdala and hippocampus in aversive conditioning to explicit and contextual cues , 1991, Neuroscience.

[39]  D. Gaffan Spatial organization of episodic memory , 1991, Hippocampus.

[40]  R J Sutherland,et al.  Exceptions to the rule of space , 1991, Hippocampus.

[41]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats. , 1991 .

[42]  H. Eichenbaum The Hippocampal System and Declarative Memory in Animals , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. , 1992, Science.

[44]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  Stimulus configuration, classical conditioning, and hippocampal function. , 1992, Psychological review.

[45]  D. Olton,et al.  Mnemonic Dissociations: The Power of Parameters , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Robert J. Sutherland,et al.  Configural and Elemental Associations and the Memory Coherence Problem , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  P. Holland,et al.  Preserved configural learning and spatial learning impairment in rats with hippocampal damage , 1992, Hippocampus.

[48]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Differential Contribution of Amygdala and Hippocampus to Cued and Contextual Fear Conditioning , 1992 .

[49]  Support for configural association theory: Now you see it, now you don't , 1992, Hippocampus.

[50]  J. W. Rudy,et al.  Some properties of configural learning: An investigation of the transverse-patterning problem. , 1992 .

[51]  M. Fanselow,et al.  Effects of amygdala, hippocampus, and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term contextual fear. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[52]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Stimulus configuration, spatial learning, and hippocampal function , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[53]  Endel Tulving,et al.  The Role of Repetition and Associative Interference in New Semantic Learning in Amnesia: A Case Experiment , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  L. Jarrard On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. , 1993, Behavioral and neural biology.

[55]  M. McKERNAN,et al.  Hippocampal lesions do not impair negative patterning: a challenge to configural association theory. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[56]  M. Gluck,et al.  Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory , 1993, Hippocampus.

[57]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system , 1993 .

[58]  L. Jarrard,et al.  A role for hippocampus in the utilization of hunger signals. , 1993, Behavioral and neural biology.

[59]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Lesions of the dorsal hippocampal formation interfere with background but not foreground contextual fear conditioning. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[60]  M. Gluck,et al.  Context, conditioning, and hippocampal rerepresentation in animal learning. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[61]  A comparison of “configural” discrimination problems: Implications for understanding the role of the hippocampal formation in learning and memory , 1995, Psychobiology.

[62]  J W Rudy,et al.  A comparison of kainic acid plus colchicine and ibotenic acid-induced hippocampal formation damage on four configural tasks in rats. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[63]  J W Rudy,et al.  Rats with damage to the hippocampal-formation are impaired on the transverse-patterning problem but not on elemental discriminations. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.