Use of spectral cloud emissivities and their related uncertainties to infer ice cloud boundaries: methodology and assessment using CALIPSO cloud products

Abstract. Satellite-imager-based operational cloud property retrievals generally assume that a cloudy pixel can be treated as being plane-parallel with horizontally homogeneous properties. This assumption can lead to high uncertainties in cloud heights, particularly for the case of optically thin, but geometrically thick, clouds composed of ice particles. This study demonstrates that ice cloud emissivity uncertainties can be used to provide a reasonable range of ice cloud layer boundaries, i.e., the minimum to maximum heights. Here ice cloud emissivity uncertainties are obtained for three IR channels centered at 11, 12, and 13.3 µm. The range of cloud emissivities is used to infer a range of ice cloud temperature and heights, rather than a single value per pixel as provided by operational cloud retrievals. Our methodology is tested using MODIS observations over the western North Pacific Ocean during August 2015. We estimate minimum–maximum heights for three cloud regimes, i.e., single-layered optically thin ice clouds, single-layered optically thick ice clouds, and multilayered clouds. Our results are assessed through comparison with CALIOP version 4 cloud products for a total of 11873 pixels. The cloud boundary heights for single-layered optically thin clouds show good agreement with those from CALIOP; biases for maximum (minimum) heights versus the cloud-top (base) heights of CALIOP are 0.13 km (−1.01 km). For optically thick and multilayered clouds, the biases of the estimated cloud heights from the cloud top or cloud base become larger (0.30/−1.71 km, 1.41/−4.64 km). The vertically resolved boundaries for ice clouds can contribute new information for data assimilation efforts for weather prediction and radiation budget studies. Our method is applicable to measurements provided by most geostationary weather satellites including the GK-2A advanced multichannel infrared imager.

[1]  David S. Henderson,et al.  Reassessing the Effect of Cloud Type on Earth’s Energy Balance in the Age of Active Spaceborne Observations. Part II: Atmospheric Heating , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[2]  T. L’Ecuyer,et al.  Reassessing the Effect of Cloud Type on Earth’s Energy Balance in the Age of Active Spaceborne Observations. Part I: Top of Atmosphere and Surface , 2019, Journal of Climate.

[3]  David M. Winker,et al.  Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version 4.1 data products , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  Zhaoyan Liu,et al.  CALIPSO lidar calibration at 1064 nm: version 4 algorithm , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[5]  David M. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 daytime algorithm , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[6]  Sihye Lee,et al.  Impacts of LEOGEO Atmospheric Motion Vectors on East Asian weather forecasts , 2018, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[7]  Anne Garnier,et al.  Extinction and optical depth retrievals for CALIPSO's Version 4 data release , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[8]  Zhaoyan Liu,et al.  CALIPSO Lidar Calibration at 532 nm: Version 4 Nighttime Algorithm. , 2018, Atmospheric measurement techniques.

[9]  Steven Platnick,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud top pressure/height from SEVIRI: analysis of ten current retrieval algorithms , 2014 .

[10]  W. Tao,et al.  A Physically Based Algorithm for Non-Blackbody Correction of Cloud-Top Temperature and Application to Convection Study , 2014 .

[11]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  MODIS Cloud-Top Property Refinements for Collection 6 , 2012 .

[12]  D. Hartmann,et al.  Testing the Role of Radiation in Determining Tropical Cloud-Top Temperature , 2012 .

[13]  Bryan A. Baum,et al.  Using CALIPSO to explore the sensitivity to cirrus height in the infrared observations from NPOESS/VIIRS and GOES‐R/ABI , 2010 .

[14]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[15]  Robert E. Holz,et al.  Computationally Efficient Methods of Collocating Satellite, Aircraft, and Ground Observations , 2009 .

[16]  Michael J. Pavolonis,et al.  Gazing at Cirrus Clouds for 25 Years through a Split Window. Part I: Methodology , 2009 .

[17]  Steven A. Ackerman,et al.  Cloud Detection with MODIS. Part II: Validation , 2008 .

[18]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  MODIS Global Cloud-Top Pressure and Amount Estimation: Algorithm Description and Results , 2008 .

[19]  D. Rosenfeld,et al.  Anthropogenic aerosol effects on convective cloud microphysical properties in southern Sweden , 2008 .

[20]  D. Winker,et al.  Initial performance assessment of CALIOP , 2007 .

[21]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Remote sensing the vertical profile of cloud droplet effective radius, thermodynamic phase, and temperature , 2007 .

[22]  Robert O. Knuteson,et al.  An Improvement to the High-Spectral-Resolution CO2-Slicing Cloud-Top Altitude Retrieval , 2006 .

[23]  Akihide Kamei,et al.  Cloud optical thickness and effective particle radius derived from transmitted solar radiation measurements: Comparison with cloud radar observations , 2006 .

[24]  Itamar M. Lensky,et al.  The time-space exchangeability of satellite retrieved relations between cloud top temperature and particle effective radius , 2005 .

[25]  Taneil Uttal,et al.  Daytime Global Cloud Typing from AVHRR and VIIRS: Algorithm Description, Validation, and Comparisons , 2005 .

[26]  J. Mecikalski,et al.  Forecasting Convective Initiation by Monitoring the Evolution of Moving Cumulus in Daytime GOES Imagery , 2004 .

[27]  Michael J. Pavolonis,et al.  Daytime Cloud Overlap Detection from AVHRR and VIIRS , 2004 .

[28]  Tristan S. L'Ecuyer,et al.  The impact of explicit cloud boundary information on ice cloud microphysical property retrievals from infrared radiances , 2003 .

[29]  W. Menzel,et al.  Improvement in thin cirrus retrievals using an emissivity-adjusted CO2 slicing algorithm , 2002 .

[30]  F. Bouttier,et al.  Observing‐system experiments in the ECMWF 4D‐Var data assimilation system , 2001 .

[31]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Remote sensing of cloud properties using MODIS airborne simulator imagery during SUCCESS: 2. Cloud thermodynamic phase , 2000 .

[32]  W. Rossow,et al.  Advances in understanding clouds from ISCCP , 1999 .

[33]  Kwo-Sen Kuo,et al.  Clustering, randomness, and regularity in cloud fields: 5. The nature of regular cumulus cloud fields , 1998 .

[34]  V. Giraud,et al.  Large-Scale Analysis of Cirrus Clouds from AVHRR Data: Assessment of Both a Microphysical Index and the Cloud-Top Temperature , 1997 .

[35]  M. Baker,et al.  Cloud Microphysics and Climate , 1997 .

[36]  James D. Spinhirne,et al.  Split‐window retrieval of particle size and optical depth in contrails located above horizontally inhomogeneous ice clouds , 1996 .

[37]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Cloud Properties inferred from 812-µm Data , 1994 .

[38]  W. Paul Menzel,et al.  Cloud properties inferred from 8-12 micron data , 1994 .

[39]  Frédéric Parol,et al.  Information Content of AVHRR Channels 4 and 5 with Respect to the Effective Radius of Cirrus Cloud Particles , 1991 .

[40]  Alfred J Prata,et al.  Observations of volcanic ash clouds in the 10-12 μm window using AVHRR/2 data , 1989 .

[41]  A. Slingo,et al.  The response of a general circulation model to cloud longwave radiative forcing. I: Introduction and initial experiments , 1988 .

[42]  Eric A. Smith,et al.  ISCCP Cloud Algorithm Intercomparison. , 1985 .

[43]  Robert F. Adler,et al.  Thunderstorm top structure observed by aircraft overflights with an infrared radiometer , 1983 .

[44]  C. Bohren,et al.  An introduction to atmospheric radiation , 1981 .

[45]  R. Adler,et al.  Relation of Satellite-Based Thunderstorm Intensity to Radar-Estimated Rainfall , 1981 .

[46]  Toshiro Inoue,et al.  On the Temperature and Effective Emissivity Determination of Semi-Transparent Cirrus Clouds by Bi-Spectral Measurements in the 10μm Window Region , 1985 .