Detection of Differential Viewing Patterns to Erotic and Non-Erotic Stimuli Using Eye-Tracking Methodology

As a first step in the investigation of the role of visual attention in the processing of erotic stimuli, eye-tracking methodology was employed to measure eye movements during erotic scene presentation. Because eye-tracking is a novel methodology in sexuality research, we attempted to determine whether the eye-tracker could detect differences (should they exist) in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic scenes. A total of 20 men and 20 women were presented with a series of erotic and non-erotic images and tracked their eye movements during image presentation. Comparisons between erotic and non-erotic image groups showed significant differences on two of three dependent measures of visual attention (number of fixations and total time) in both men and women. As hypothesized, there was a significant Stimulus × Scene Region interaction, indicating that participants visually attended to the body more in the erotic stimuli than in the non-erotic stimuli, as evidenced by a greater number of fixations and longer total time devoted to that region. These findings provide support for the application of eye-tracking methodology as a measure of visual attentional capture in sexuality research. Future applications of this methodology to expand our knowledge of the role of cognition in sexuality are suggested.

[1]  Sex differences in memory for erotica , 1990 .

[2]  S. Hamann,et al.  Men and women differ in amygdala response to visual sexual stimuli , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  J. Henderson,et al.  The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing , 1999 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  Biases in eye movements to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder. , 2000 .

[6]  Mark Spiering,et al.  Priming the sexual system: Implicit versus explicit activation , 2003, Journal of sex research.

[7]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Gaze Patterns When Looking at Emotional Pictures: Motivationally Biased Attention , 2004 .

[8]  J. Janssen,et al.  Automatic processes and the appraisal of sexual stimuli: Toward an information processing model of sexual arousal , 2000 .

[9]  K. Rayner Eye Movements and Cognitive Processes in Reading, Visual Search, and Scene Perception , 1995 .

[10]  D W Massaro,et al.  Information processing models: microscopes of the mind. , 1993, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  J. Geer,et al.  Reading Times for Erotic Material: The Pause to Reflect , 1994 .

[12]  D. Isaacowitz The Gaze of the Optimist , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[13]  J. Henderson,et al.  High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  J. Geer,et al.  Sexual Content-Induced Delay With Double-Entendre Words , 1997, Archives of sexual behavior.

[15]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[16]  J. Geer,et al.  Sexual content induced delays in unprimed lexical decisions: Gender and context effects , 1996, Archives of sexual behavior.

[17]  D. Byrne,et al.  The mediating role of cognitive processes in self-reported sexual arousal , 1984 .

[18]  I. M. Evans,et al.  The effects of distraction, performance demand, stimulus explicitness and personality on objective and subjective measures of male sexual arousal , 1979 .

[19]  Nancy Millette,et al.  How People Look at Pictures , 1935 .

[20]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Eye Movements During Scene Viewing: An Overview , 1998 .

[21]  J. Geer,et al.  Cognitive factors in sexual arousal: the role of distraction. , 1976, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  Daniel Lundqvist,et al.  Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention , 2005 .

[23]  J. Henderson Visual Attention and Eye Movement Control During Reading and Picture Viewing , 1992 .