Ideation-Execution Transition in Product Development: An Experimental Analysis

Bringing a new product to market involves both a creative ideation stage and an execution stage. When time-to-market constraints are binding, important questions are how to divide limited time between the two stages and who should make this decision. We introduce a laboratory experiment that closely resembles this setting: it features a product development task with an open design space, a downstream cost increase, and two development stages. We show that performance is significantly worse when designers choose for themselves when to transition from ideation to execution and that decision control explains a large share of performance variation even after controlling for individual differences. How the time is allocated between ideation and execution does not affect mean performance, but later transition increases risk. One driver of poor design outcomes in the designer-initiated transition regime are delays in physical construction and testing of designs. We show that such delays can be prevented by “nudg...

[1]  John A. List,et al.  Multiple hypothesis testing in experimental economics , 2016, Experimental Economics.

[2]  Mark E. Ferguson,et al.  PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT , 2008 .

[3]  H. H. Ku,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics, Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. , 1961 .

[4]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders-I , 1997 .

[5]  D. Ariely,et al.  Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment , 2002, Psychological science.

[6]  Özalp Özer,et al.  Competing on Time: An Integrated Framework to Optimize Dynamic Time-to-Market and Production Decisions , 2012 .

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[8]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[9]  Susan Athey,et al.  Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Sanjiv Erat.  Making the Best Even Better: How Idea Pool Structure can make the Top Ideas Exceptional , 2012 .

[11]  Christian Terwiesch,et al.  Managing Demand and Sales Dynamics in New Product Diffusion Under Supply Constraint , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[12]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[13]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[14]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[15]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Process Structuring in Electronic Brainstorming , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[16]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  On the Interface Between Operations and Human Resources Management , 2003, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[17]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity , 2005 .

[18]  M. Lepper,et al.  When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? , 2000 .

[19]  Wing-Keung Wong,et al.  Stochastic dominance via quantile regression: Working paper series--11-01 , 2011 .

[20]  Teck-Hua Ho,et al.  New product development: the performance and time-to-market tradeoff , 1996 .

[21]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments , 1998 .

[22]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[24]  Adrian S. Choo.  Defining Problems Fast and Slow: The U‐shaped Effect of Problem Definition Time on Project Duration , 2014 .

[25]  Ali Haghani,et al.  Inter-phase feedbacks in construction projects , 2015 .

[26]  C. Gersick.  Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development , 1988 .

[27]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Subgoals as substitutes or complements: the role of goal accessibility. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  E. Mansfield.  The speed and cost of industrial innovation in Japan and the United States: external vs. internal technology , 1988 .

[29]  R. Verganti.  Planned Flexibility: Linking Anticipation and Reaction in Product Development Projects , 1999 .

[30]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[31]  Gordon Anderson,et al.  Nonparametric Tests of Stochastic Dominance in Income Distributions , 1996 .

[32]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[33]  J. Cuzick.  A Wilcoxon-type test for trend. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[34]  C. Shalley,et al.  Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: the role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. , 2001, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[35]  Gustavo Manso,et al.  Is Pay-for-Performance Detrimental to Innovation? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[37]  C. Gersick.  MARKING TIME: PREDICTABLE TRANSITIONS IN TASK GROUPS , 1989 .

[38]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[40]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[41]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[42]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Stage-Gate Controls, Learning Failure, and Adverse Effect on Novel New Products , 2008 .

[43]  Daniel Schunk,et al.  How Do Judgmental Overconfidence and Overoptimism Shape Innovative Activity? , 2013, Games Econ. Behav..

[44]  C. Terwiesch,et al.  Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development , 1999 .

[45]  Joseph A. Maxwell,et al.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1996 .

[46]  Gurumurthy Kalyanaram,et al.  Deliberate Product Definition: Customizing the Product Definition Process , 1997 .

[47]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[48]  Scott R. Klemmer,et al.  The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints , 2009, C&C '09.

[49]  M. Iansiti.  Shooting the Rapids: Managing Product Development in Turbulent Environments , 1995 .

[50]  Robert Rosen,et al.  On explaining creativity , 1988 .

[51]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  Fundamentals of Qualitative Research , 2011 .

[52]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[53]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: capacity and congestion effects , 1999 .

[54]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[55]  Gustavo Manso,et al.  Is Pay-for-Performance Detrimental to Innovation? , 2012 .

[56]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Structuring Time and Task in Electronic Brainstorming , 1999, MIS Q..

[57]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[58]  Stefano Biazzo,et al.  Flexibility, Structuration, and Simultaneity in New Product Development , 2009 .

[59]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Managing Experimentation in the Design of New Products , 1998 .

[60]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[61]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics , 1960 .

[62]  Sanjiv Erat,et al.  Managing Delegated Search Over Design Spaces , 2012, Manag. Sci..

[63]  W. Hoeffding,et al.  Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling , 1961 .

[64]  J. A. Litterer,et al.  ORGANIZATIONS: STRUCTURE AND BEHAVIOR.. , 1964 .

[65]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[66]  M. Scheerer,et al.  Problem Solving , 1967, Nature.

[67]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.