Using Clickers to Facilitate Development of Problem-Solving Skills

Classroom response systems, or clickers, have become pedagogical staples of the undergraduate science curriculum at many universities. In this study, the effectiveness of clickers in promoting problem-solving skills in a genetics class was investigated. Students were presented with problems requiring application of concepts covered in lecture and were polled for the correct answer. A histogram of class responses was displayed, and students were encouraged to discuss the problem, which enabled them to better understand the correct answer. Students were then presented with a similar problem and were again polled. My results indicate that those students who were initially unable to solve the problem were then able to figure out how to solve similar types of problems through a combination of trial and error and class discussion. This was reflected in student performance on exams, where there was a statistically significant positive correlation between grades and the percentage of clicker questions answered. Interestingly, there was no clear correlation between exam grades and the percentage of clicker questions answered correctly. These results suggest that students who attempt to solve problems in class are better equipped to solve problems on exams.

[1]  Kathryn E. Perez,et al.  Does Displaying the Class Results Affect Student Discussion during Peer Instruction? , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[2]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[3]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[4]  D. Nicol,et al.  Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom , 2003 .

[5]  Clyde Freeman Herreid,et al.  It’s All Their Fault? , 2010, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[6]  Jeff Cain,et al.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations. , 2008, American journal of pharmaceutical education.

[7]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[8]  William B Wood,et al.  Teaching more by lecturing less. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[9]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to cell biology teaching: cooperative learning in the science classroom--beyond students working in groups. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[10]  Jane E Caldwell,et al.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[11]  Kirsten Crossgrove,et al.  Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  Jennifer K Knight,et al.  The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  Linda J Collins.  Livening Up the Classroom , 2007, Medical reference services quarterly.

[14]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches in cell biology teaching. , 2002, Cell biology education.

[15]  Alison Crowe,et al.  Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  J. Collins,et al.  Audience response systems: technology to engage learners. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[17]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions , 2009, Science.

[18]  J. Stanley,et al.  Book Review: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1957 .

[19]  Margaret I. Brown,et al.  Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User’s Manual , 1999 .

[21]  Elaine B. Coleman,et al.  Using Explanatory Knowledge During Collaborative Problem Solving in Science , 1998 .

[22]  G. DeBourgh,et al.  Use of classroom "clickers" to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills. , 2008, Nurse education in practice.

[23]  Ralph W Preszler.  Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Mindy McWilliams,et al.  Using Clickers for Clinical Reasoning and Problem Solving , 2011, Nurse educator.

[25]  Mark C. James.  The effect of grading incentive on student discourse in Peer Instruction , 2006 .

[26]  K. Krauter,et al.  Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept Questions , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[27]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  The Effect of Instructional Explanations on Learning From Scientific Texts , 1997 .

[28]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[29]  Kimberly D Tanner,et al.  Talking to learn: why biology students should be talking in classrooms and how to make it happen. , 2009, CBE life sciences education.

[30]  Shu-Mei Chang,et al.  Cooperative learning in industrial-sized biology classes. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[31]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: understanding the wrong answers--teaching toward conceptual change. , 2005, Cell biology education.

[32]  Lei Bao,et al.  Testing a new voting machine question methodology , 2008 .

[33]  Tammy M. Long,et al.  Just the Facts? Introductory Undergraduate Biology Courses Focus on Low-Level Cognitive Skills , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[34]  Michèle Shuster,et al.  Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.