A combined QFD and integer programming framework to determine attribute levels for conjoint study

In a recent paper, Chaudhuri and Bhattacharyya propose a methodology combing Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Integer Programming framework to determine the attribute levels for a Conjoint Analysis (CA). The product planning decisions, however, are typically taken one to two years before the actual launch of the products. The design team needs some flexibility in improving the Technical Characteristics (TCs) based on minimum performance improvements in Customer Requirements (CRs) and the imposed budgetary constraints. Thus there is a need to treat the budget and the minimum performance improvements in CRs as flexible rather than rigid. In this paper, we represent them as fuzzy numbers instead of crisp numbers. Then a fuzzy integer programming (FIP) model is used to determine the appropriate TCs and hence the right attribute levels for a conjoint study. The proposed method is applied to a commercial vehicle design problem with hypothetical data.

[1]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Methodological problems in QFD and directions for future development , 2007 .

[2]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[3]  Min Xie,et al.  Optimizing product design using quantitative quality function deployment: a case study , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[4]  S. K. Mukherjee,et al.  Integrating AHP with QFD for robot selection under requirement perspective , 2005 .

[5]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice , 1990 .

[6]  Richard Y. K. Fung,et al.  Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model , 2002 .

[7]  Ronald G. Askin,et al.  Optimal new product design using quality function deployment with empirical value functions , 1999 .

[8]  Gerald W. Evans,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria models for quality function deployment , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Gerald M. Katz,et al.  PRACTITIONER NOTE: A Response to Pullman et al.'s (2002) Comparison of Quality Function Deployment versus Conjoint Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Billy E. Gillett,et al.  Parametric Integer Programming Analysis: A Contraction Approach , 1980 .

[11]  Min Xie,et al.  Prioritizing quality characteristics in dynamic quality function deployment , 2006 .

[12]  Shiang-Tai Liu Rating design requirements in fuzzy quality function deployment via a mathematical programming approach , 2005 .

[13]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system , 1996 .

[14]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Martin Schader,et al.  Data Analysis and Decision Support , 2006 .

[16]  Daniel Baier,et al.  Improving the Predictive Validity of Quality Function Deployment by Conjoint Analysis: A Monte Carlo Comparison , 2005, OR.

[17]  Jürgen Bode,et al.  Cost engineering with quality function deployment , 1998 .

[18]  R. Y. K. Fung,et al.  Fuzzy expected value modelling approach for determining target values of engineering characteristics in QFD , 2005 .

[19]  Daniel Baier,et al.  Linking Quality Function Deployment and Conjoint Analysis for New Product Design , 2005, Data Analysis and Decision Support.

[20]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[21]  R. E. Marsten,et al.  Parametric Integer Programming: The Right-Hand-Side Case , 2018 .

[22]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Antonio J. Bailetti,et al.  Integrating customer requirements into product designs , 1995 .

[24]  F. Herrera,et al.  EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL , 1992 .

[25]  Fiorenzo Franceschini,et al.  Quality function deployment: How to improve its use , 1998 .

[26]  William L. Moore,et al.  A Comparison of Quality Function Deployment and Conjoint Analysis in New Product Design , 2002 .

[27]  Seyed Hossein Iranmanesh,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF RANK RESERVAL WHEN USING FUZZY IMPORTANCE LEVELS IN QFD ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[28]  Bruce L. Stern,et al.  Research for Marketing Decisions , 1978 .

[29]  Ashraf Labib,et al.  A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets , 2001 .

[30]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval , 1981, Inf. Sci..