The effects of global similarity between stimuli on children's judgment of rime and alliteration

A total of 38 preschool children (3 and 4 years old) were assessed on a set of phonological awareness tasks three times over the course of a year. The tasks used were rhyme and alliteration matching tasks with distractor items that were either semantically or phonologically related to the target. In both tasks, the children found the distractors matched for phonological similarity more difficult to reject than the semantically related distractors or the unrelated distractors. The results emphasize the importance of controlling for global phonological factors when designing phonological awareness tasks. The longitudinal findings are discussed within the context of current theories on the development of phonological representations.

[1]  A. Walley Young children's detections of word-initial and -final mispronunciations in constrained and unconstrained contexts. , 1987 .

[2]  Cláudia Cardoso-Martins Rhyme perception: global or analytical? , 1994 .

[3]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  J. Bowey On Rhyme, language, and children's reading , 1990, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[5]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological Skills and Learning to Read , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[7]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[8]  S. Singh,et al.  Perceptual structure of 12 American English vowels. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Amanda C. Walley,et al.  The Role of Vocabulary Development in Children′s Spoken Word Recognition and Segmentation Ability , 1993 .

[10]  P Bryant Sensitivity to onset and rhyme does predict young Children's reading: a comment on Muter, Hulme, Snowling, and Taylor (1997) , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[11]  Muter,et al.  Segmentation does predict early progress in learning to read better than rhyme: A reply to bryant , 1998, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[12]  Carolyn Chaney,et al.  Language development, metalinguistic skills, and print awareness in 3-year-old children , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[13]  Jamie L. Metsala,et al.  Young children's phonological awareness and nonword repetition as a function of vocabulary development. , 1999 .

[14]  Barbara Fox,et al.  Analyzing spoken language into words, syllables, and phonomes: A developmental study , 1975 .

[15]  M Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  The role of coarticulatory effects in the perception of fricatives by children and adults. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  C. Hulme,et al.  Dyslexia : biology, cognition and intervention , 1997 .

[17]  M. Maclean Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood. , 1987 .

[18]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  A Distributed Memory Model of the Associative Boost in Semantic Priming , 1994, Connect. Sci..

[19]  C. Hulme,et al.  Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[20]  R. Treiman,et al.  Common phoneme and overall similarity relations among spoken syllables: Their use by children and adults , 1982, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[21]  C. A. Ferguson,et al.  WORDS AND SOUNDS IN EARLY LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1975 .