Cross-cultural evaluations of avatar facial expressions

Avatars are increasingly used to express our emotions in our online communications. Such avatars are used based on the assumption that avatar expressions are interpreted universally among any cultures. However, our former studies showed there are cultural differences in interpreting avatar facial expressions. This paper summarizes the results of the former studies of cross cultural evaluations of avatar expressions and introducing an ongoing experiment. The goals of these studies are: 1) to investigate cultural differences in avatar expression evaluation and apply findings from Psychological study in human facial expression recognition, 2) to identify design features that cause cultural differences in avatar facial expression interpretation. The results of the former studies confirmed that 1) there are cultural differences in interpreting avatars’ facial expressions, and the psychological theory that suggests physical proximity affects facial expression recognition accuracy is also applicable to avatar facial expressions, 2) use of gestures and gesture marks may sometimes cause counter-effects in recognizing avatar facial expressions. Author

[1]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Culturally-Situated Pictogram Retrieval , 2007, IWIC.

[2]  P. Ekman,et al.  The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .

[3]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Cross-cultural study of avatar expression interpretations , 2006, International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (SAINT'06).

[4]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Helper agent: designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space , 2000, CHI.

[5]  Andrew Ortony,et al.  The Cognitive Structure of Emotions , 1988 .

[6]  Tomodo Koda Interpretation of Emotionally Expressive Characters in an Intercultural Communication , 2004, KES.

[7]  J. P. Foley,et al.  Gesture and Environment , 1942 .

[8]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[10]  Hillary Anger Elfenbein,et al.  Cultural Similarity's Consequences , 2003 .

[11]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Connecting the Universal to the Specific: Towards the Global Grid , 2007, IWIC.

[12]  Per Persson,et al.  Exms: an animated and avatar-based messaging system for expressive peer communication , 2003, GROUP.

[13]  P. Ekman Emotions Revealed: Recognizing Faces and Feelings to Improve Communication and Emotional Life , 2003 .

[14]  Yumiko Mori Atoms of Bonding: Communication Components Bridging Children Worldwide (Invited Talk) , 2007, IWIC.

[15]  Toshiyuki Takasaki,et al.  Design and Development of a Pictogram Communication System for Children Around the World , 2007, IWIC.

[16]  Tomoko Koda,et al.  Cross-Cultural Study of Avatars' Facial Expressions and Design Considerations Within Asian Countries , 2007, IWIC.

[17]  Steven M. Drucker,et al.  The social life of small graphical chat spaces , 2000, CHI.

[18]  David Salesin,et al.  Comic Chat , 1996, SIGGRAPH.