Acquisition of attention skill in pervasively hyperactive children.

The hypothesis that pervasively hyperactive children have disturbed attention and fail to acquire learning skills is tested. Attention and learning skills are defined here in terms of the controlled versus automatic processing distinction. In this report 12 pervasively hyperactive children and 12 controls were compared for their ability to develop automatic information processing during a memory recognition task. It was predicted that, if hyperactive children failed to adopt task-appropriate cognitive sets, automatic processing would either fail or develop more slowly than in controls. The data indicated that the groups differed in task efficiency: hyperactive children were slower, within-subject variance of reaction time was greater, and errors occurred more frequently than in controls. However, group differences could not be explained in terms of an attention dysfunction or an inability to develop automatic processing in the hyperactive child.

[1]  J. Meere,et al.  A divided attention experiment with pervasively hyperactive children , 1987, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[2]  J. Sergeant,et al.  On data limitations in hyperactivity. , 1985, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  J. Sergeant,et al.  On resource strategy limitations in hyperactivity: cognitive impulsivity reconsidered. , 1985, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[4]  G Mulder,et al.  The information processing paradigm: concepts, methods and limitations. , 1983, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[5]  J. Sergeant,et al.  A stages-of-information approach to hyperactivity. , 1983, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Degree of consistent training: Improvements in search performance and automatic process development , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  E. Hunt,et al.  Automatic and controlled attention processes in auditory target detection. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Control and Automatic Processing During Tasks Requiring Sustained Attention: A New Approach to Vigilance , 1981 .

[9]  M. Rutter,et al.  The characteristics of situationally and pervasively hyperactive children: implications for syndrome definition. , 1981, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[10]  R. Dykman,et al.  Selective and Sustained Attention in Hyperactive, Learning‐Disabled, and Normal Boys , 1979, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[11]  J. Sergeant,et al.  Hyperactivity, impulsivity and reflectivity: an examination of their relationship and implications for clinical child psychology. , 1979, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[12]  G. Logan.  Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. , 1978 .

[13]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[14]  S. Campbell,et al.  A three-year follow-up of hyperactive preschoolers into elementary school. , 1977, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[15]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[16]  V. Douglas,et al.  Sustained attention in hyperactive children. , 1973, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.