Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Novel Microneedle Array-based Continuous Glucose Monitor

Background: The development of accurate, minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices has been the subject of much work by several groups, as it is believed that a less invasive and more user-friendly device will result in greater adoption of CGM by persons with insulin-dependent diabetes. Methods: This article presents the results of preliminary clinical studies in subjects with diabetes of a novel prototype microneedle-based continuous glucose monitor. In this device, an array of tiny hollow microneedles is applied into the epidermis from where glucose in interstitial fluid (ISF) is transported via passive diffusion to an amperometric glucose sensor external to the body. Results: Comparison of 1396 paired device glucose measurements and fingerstick blood glucose readings for up to 72-hour wear in 10 diabetic subjects shows the device to be accurate and well tolerated by the subjects. Overall mean absolute relative difference (MARD) is 15% with 98.4% of paired points in the A+B region of the Clarke error grid. Conclusions: The prototype device has demonstrated clinically accurate glucose readings over 72 hours, the first time a microneedle-based device has achieved such performance.

[1]  Beelee Chua,et al.  Effect of microneedles shape on skin penetration and minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring in vivo , 2013 .

[2]  R O Potts,et al.  The GlucoWatch® biographer: a frequent, automatic and noninvasive glucose monitor , 2000, Annals of medicine.

[3]  S. Garg,et al.  Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems. , 2010, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[4]  J. Hans DeVries,et al.  Current Application of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Treatment of Diabetes , 2011, Diabetes Care.

[5]  Elizabeth Taylor,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a continuous minimally invasive glucose flux sensor placed over ultrasonically permeated skin. , 2004, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[6]  John H. Draize,et al.  METHODS FOR THE STUDY OF IRRITATION AND TOXICITY OF SUBSTANCES APPLIED TOPICALLY TO THE SKIN AND MUCOUS MEMBRANES , 1944 .

[7]  Mark R. Prausnitz,et al.  Effect of Microneedle Design on Pain in Human Volunteers , 2008, The Clinical journal of pain.

[8]  R. Potts,et al.  Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects. , 2003, Diabetes care.

[9]  Mark R Prausnitz,et al.  Minimally invasive extraction of dermal interstitial fluid for glucose monitoring using microneedles. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[10]  T. Stedeford,et al.  The development of minimally invasive continuous Metabolic Monitoring Technologies in the U.S. Army TMM Research Program. , 2005, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  N. Oliver,et al.  Use of microneedle array devices for continuous glucose monitoring: a review. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  Roy Beck,et al.  Prolonged use of continuous glucose monitors in children with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or intensive multiple‐daily injection therapy , 2009, Pediatric diabetes.

[13]  Howard Wolpert,et al.  Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes , 2009 .

[14]  F. Ovalle,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Intensive Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009 .

[15]  Santhisagar Vaddiraju,et al.  Technologies for Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Current Problems and Future Promises , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.