The impact of Co-actors on cognitive load: When the mere presence of others makes learning more difficult

Abstract A large body of research has established the value of learner characteristics on cognitive load. However, little attention has been paid to the physical environment where learning takes place. The present study takes a step to address this gap by studying the impact of the presence of others during learning on cognitive load. In a between-subject design, participants (N = 115) were randomly arranged in groups of different group sizes to study computer-based multimedia materials (group size range: 1-13, continuous variable). Further, participants' working memory capacity, topic interest, and their prior knowledge were measured to reveal relevant learner characteristics. Dependent variables were learning performance, perceived task difficulty (mental load), and invested mental effort. We tested the predictions from cognitive load theory with alternative path models to identify the best model fit. Our results show that group size predicted learners' perceived task difficulty: the larger the group of co-actors in the learning situation was, the higher the perceived task difficulty. Moreover, higher topic interest led to lower perceived task difficulty, and more mental effort, although that effect became non-significant after multiple testing adjustment. Perceived task difficulty mediated the effect of group size and topic interest on mental effort.

[1]  Nicolas Fay,et al.  Audience Design through Social Interaction during Group Discussion , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive load theory: New directions and challenges , 2012 .

[3]  N. Triplett,et al.  The Dynamogenic Factors in Pacemaking and Competition , 1898 .

[4]  Jerry M Crutchfield,et al.  Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  C. F. Bond,et al.  Social facilitation: a meta-analysis of 241 studies. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Anne Deiglmayr,et al.  Domain-Specific Prior Knowledge and Learning: A Meta-Analysis , 2018 .

[7]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[8]  Christina Bodin Danielson,et al.  Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on indicators of health and performance , 2014 .

[9]  R. Moreno,et al.  Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  Sofie M. M. Loyens,et al.  Gaining from explaining: Learning improves from explaining to fictitious others on video, not from writing to them , 2016 .

[11]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[12]  T. Lachmann,et al.  Does noise affect learning? A short review on noise effects on cognitive performance in children , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Floyd H. Allport,et al.  The Group Fallacy in Relation to Social Science , 1924, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Deborah Harrop,et al.  A Study Exploring Learners' Informal Learning Space Behaviors, Attitudes, and Preferences , 2013 .

[15]  Moritz Krell,et al.  Evaluating an instrument to measure mental load and mental effort considering different sources of validity evidence , 2017 .

[16]  Geert P.M.R. Dewulf,et al.  Learning space preferences of higher education students , 2016 .

[17]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  The Effects of Model Parsimony and Sampling Error on the Fit of Structural Equation Models , 2001 .

[18]  P. Chandler,et al.  Assimilating complex information , 2002 .

[19]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  Allison J. Jaeger,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: The Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Principle in Multimedia Learning , 2014 .

[21]  Luiz Bueno da Silva,et al.  Analysis of air temperature changes on blood pressure and heart rate and performance of undergraduate students. , 2017, Work.

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[23]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[24]  Bernd H. Schmitt,et al.  Mere presence and social facilitation: One more time , 1986 .

[25]  Pedro F. S. Rodrigues,et al.  Attention and working memory in elderly: the influence of a distracting environment , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[26]  D. Garrison,et al.  Assessing Social Presence In Asynchronous Text-based Computer Conferencing , 1999 .

[27]  T. Gog,et al.  Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[28]  J. H. Steiger Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[29]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  The specific involvement of verbal and visuospatial working memory in hypermedia learning , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[30]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2020, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[31]  J. Wiley,et al.  An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[32]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Role of dual task design when measuring cognitive load during multimedia learning , 2012, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[34]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring. , 2001 .

[35]  G. Evans,et al.  Motivational consequences of environmental stress , 2004 .

[36]  Randall W. Engle,et al.  Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Retrieval: A Cue-Dependent Search Approach. , 2007 .

[37]  R. Yerkes,et al.  The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit‐formation , 1908 .

[38]  M. Knepp,et al.  Group administration influences design but not written word fluency testing , 2014, Laterality.

[39]  P. Huguet,et al.  Social presence effects in the Stroop task: further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Generalized latent variable models: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models , 2004 .

[41]  R. Garner,et al.  "Seductive details" and learning from text. , 1992 .

[42]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[43]  Philip Schatz,et al.  Group Versus Individual Administration Affects Baseline Neurocognitive Test Performance , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[44]  Peter E. Doolittle Multimedia Learning and Working Memory Capacity , 2009 .

[45]  D. Berry,et al.  Disruption of office‐related tasks by speech and office noise , 1998 .

[46]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[47]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction , 1999 .

[48]  Ralf Rummer,et al.  Integrating written text and graphics as a desirable difficulty in long-term multimedia learning , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  S. Tobias Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning , 1994 .

[50]  Rasmus Bååth,et al.  The association between office design and performance on demanding cognitive tasks , 2015 .

[51]  F. Chen Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[52]  Larry B. Wallnau,et al.  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1985 .

[53]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Topic interest and free recall of expository text. , 1996 .

[54]  Robert S. Baron,et al.  Distraction-Conflict Theory: Progress and Problems , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[55]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  The Role of Working Memory in Multimedia Instruction: Is Working Memory Working During Learning from Text and Pictures? , 2011 .

[56]  Jim Blascovich,et al.  Social "facilitation" as challenge and threat. , 1999 .

[57]  R. Mayer,et al.  Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction , 2014 .

[58]  F. J. R. C. Dochy,et al.  Instructional Implications of Recent Research and Empirically-Based Theories on the Effect of Prior Knowledge on Learning , 1990 .

[59]  S. Hygge,et al.  Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration , 2011 .

[60]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later , 2019, Educational Psychology Review.

[61]  L. Tucker,et al.  A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis , 1973 .

[62]  Andreas Krapp,et al.  Basic needs and the development of interest and intrinsic motivational orientations , 2005 .

[63]  R. Mayer,et al.  When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? , 2001 .

[64]  Joseph Pessin,et al.  The Comparative Effects of Social and Mechanical Stimulation on Memorizing , 1933 .

[65]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[66]  Michael F. Bunting,et al.  The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[67]  Ivar Bråten,et al.  Cognitive Load and Working Memory in Multimedia Learning: Conceptual and Measurement Issues , 2019, Educational Psychologist.

[68]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[69]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  The Influence of Topic Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Cognitive Capabilities on Text Comprehension , 1990 .

[70]  E. Bjork,et al.  Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. , 2011 .

[71]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[72]  F. Paas,et al.  Effects of the Physical Environment on Cognitive Load and Learning: Towards a New Model of Cognitive Load , 2014 .

[73]  F. Paas,et al.  Enhancing Example-Based Learning: Teaching on Video Increases Arousal and Improves Problem-Solving Performance , 2019, Journal of Educational Psychology.