The effect of intraoral suction on oxygen-enriched surgical environments: a mechanism for reducing the risk of surgical fires.

In this study, a mechanical model was applied in order to replicate potential surgical fire conditions in an oxygen-enriched environment with and without high-volume suction typical for dental surgical applications. During 41 trials, 3 combustion events were measured: an audible pop, a visible flash of light, and full ignition. In at least 11 of 21 trials without suction, all 3 conditions were observed, sometimes with an extent of fire that required early termination of the experimental trial. By contrast, in 18 of 20 with-suction trials, ignition did not occur at all, and in the 2 cases where ignition did occur, the fire was qualitatively a much smaller, candle-like flame. Statistically comparing these 3 combustion events in the no-suction versus with-suction trials, ignition (P = .0005), audible pop (P = .0211), and flash (P = .0092) were all significantly more likely in the no-suction condition. These results suggest a possible significant and new element to be added to existing surgical fire safety protocols toward making surgical fires the "never-events" they should be.

[1]  Andrea M VanCleave,et al.  Factors involved in dental surgery fires: a review of the literature. , 2014, Anesthesia progress.

[2]  Lorri A. Lee,et al.  Injury and Liability Associated with Monitored Anesthesia Care: A Closed Claims Analysis , 2006, Anesthesiology.

[3]  G. Wolf,et al.  Laser Ignition of Surgical Drape Materials in Air, 50% Oxygen, and 95% Oxygen , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[4]  J. Tobias,et al.  Effect of cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes on the oropharyngeal oxygen and volatile anesthetic agent concentration in children. , 2012, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[5]  J. Goldberg Brief laboratory report: surgical drape flammability. , 2006, AANA journal.

[6]  M. Bruley Surgical fires: perioperative communication is essential to prevent this rare but devastating complication , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[7]  Lee P. Smith,et al.  What does it take to start an oropharyngeal fire? Oxygen requirements to start fires in the operating room. , 2011, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[8]  S. Mehta Cautery Fires in the Operating Room , 2012 .

[9]  Christine Stowe Rinder,et al.  Fire safety in the operating room , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[10]  R. Silverman,et al.  Prevention of 3 “Never Events” in the Operating Room: Fires, Gossypiboma, and Wrong-Site Surgery , 2011, Surgical innovation.

[11]  J. Weaver Prevention of fire in the dental chair. , 2012, Anesthesia progress.

[12]  E. Warren,et al.  Fire safety in the dental practice: a literature review. , 2011, Journal of the Irish Dental Association.

[13]  J. Weaver Fire hazards with ambulatory anesthesia in the dental office. , 2004, Anesthesia progress.

[14]  V. Gibbs Thinking in three's: changing surgical patient safety practices in the complex modern operating room. , 2012, World journal of gastroenterology.

[15]  P. Casamassimo,et al.  A preliminary analysis of the US dental health care system's capacity to treat children with special health care needs. , 2011, Pediatric dentistry.

[16]  D. Charlton Determination of minimum suction level necessary for field dental units. , 2010, Military medicine.

[17]  L. Donaldson,et al.  Surgical fires, a clear and present danger. , 2010, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.