Place of fulvestrant in the treatment of patients with metastatic luminal Her2-negative breast cancer

Hormone therapy alone or in combination with targeted agents (CDK4/6 inhibitors, alpelisib, everolimus) is currently the standard treatment of metastatic luminal Her2-negative breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors and fulvestrant are the main hormone therapy agents. Fulvestrant belongs to a special class of antiestrogens – selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERD) and does not have estrogen receptor agonist activity, unlike tamoxifen. In addition, the efficacy of fulvestrant does not depend on the presence of ESR1 mutations in the tumor. The combination of aromatase inhibitors with CDK4/6 inhibitors is the standard first-line treatment in patients with hormone-sensitive tumors, that is, with progression of more than 1 year after the end of adjuvant hormone therapy. Whereas fulvestrant ± CDK4/6 inhibitors are used for disease progression on adjuvant hormonal therapy in the 1st line or as 2nd line for progression on aromatase inhibitor therapy for metastatic cancer. The choice of treatment for patients with a PIK3CA mutation with progression on the 1st line of fulvestrant with a CDK4/6 inhibitor is difficult. This article presents a clinical example of the use of a combination of fulvestrant and alpelisib in a patient with secondary hormone resistance (progression on the adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors) and progression on the first-line therapy with fulvestrant and palbociclib. Carrying out therapy with fulvestrant and alpelisib as the 2nd line provided a long-term (for 14 months) stabilization of the tumor process.

[1]  P. Neven,et al.  Abstract PD13-05: Alpelisib + fulvestrant in patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2— advanced breast cancer (ABC) who received chemotherapy or endocrine therapy (ET) as immediate prior treatment: BYLieve Cohort C primary results and exploratory biomarker analyses , 2022, Cancer Research.

[2]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Fulvestrant-Palbociclib vs Letrozole-Palbociclib as Initial Therapy for Endocrine-Sensitive, Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[3]  A. Giordano,et al.  Endocrine treatment versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  H. Rugo,et al.  Alpelisib for PIK3CA‐Mutated, Hormone Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Fasching,et al.  Phase III Randomized Study of Ribociclib and Fulvestrant in Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: MONALEESA-3. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Goetz,et al.  MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib As Initial Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Chris Cameron,et al.  Systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing palbociclib with chemotherapy agents for the treatment of postmenopausal women with HR-positive and HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer , 2017, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[8]  P. Neven,et al.  MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in Combination With Fulvestrant in Women With HR+/HER2- Advanced Breast Cancer Who Had Progressed While Receiving Endocrine Therapy. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Ellis,et al.  Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[10]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Winer,et al.  Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  M. Dowsett,et al.  Plasma ESR1 Mutations and the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  S. Loi,et al.  Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  Didier Verhoeven,et al.  Final Overall Survival: Fulvestrant 500mg vs 250mg in the Randomized CONFIRM Trial , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  A. Howell,et al.  Edinburgh Research Explorer Fulvestrant plus anastrozole or placebo versus exemestane alone after progression on non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (SoFEA): a composite, multicentre, phase 3 random , 2013 .

[16]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.

[17]  Rachel Schiff,et al.  Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. , 2011, Annual review of medicine.

[18]  H. Iwata,et al.  Three dose regimens of fulvestrant in postmenopausal Japanese women with advanced breast cancer: results from a double-blind, phase II comparative study (FINDER1). , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  M. Lichinitser,et al.  Results of the CONFIRM phase III trial comparing fulvestrant 250 mg with fulvestrant 500 mg in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  M. Ellis,et al.  Activity of fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: results from the FIRST study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  F. Sapunar,et al.  Pharmacokinetic profile of the fulvestrant loading dose regimen in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. , 2008, Clinical breast cancer.

[22]  Anthony Howell,et al.  Comparison of fulvestrant versus tamoxifen for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women previously untreated with endocrine therapy: a multinational, double-blind, randomized trial. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  C. Osborne,et al.  Fulvestrant: an oestrogen receptor antagonist with a novel mechanism of action , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  J. Robertson,et al.  Equivalent single-dose pharmacokinetics of two different dosing methods of prolonged-release fulvestrant ('Faslodex') in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer , 2003, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[25]  A. Howell,et al.  Fulvestrant, formerly ICI 182,780, is as effective as anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing after prior endocrine treatment. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  C K Osborne,et al.  Double-blind, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and tolerability of fulvestrant versus anastrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer progressing on prior endocrine therapy: results of a North American trial. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  B. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Responses to Pure Antiestrogens (ICI 164384, ICI182780) in Estrogen‐Sensitive and‐Resistant Experimental and Clinical Breast Cancer a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  M. Parker,et al.  The antiestrogen ICI 182780 disrupts estrogen receptor nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[29]  A. Wakeling,et al.  A potent specific pure antiestrogen with clinical potential. , 1991, Cancer research.

[30]  V. Jordan,et al.  Effect of steroidal and nonsteroidal antiestrogens on the growth of a tamoxifen-stimulated human endometrial carcinoma (EnCa101) in athymic mice. , 1990, Cancer research.

[31]  E. Borden,et al.  Differential ability of antiestrogens to stimulate breast cancer cell (MCF-7) growth in vivo and in vitro. , 1989, Cancer research.

[32]  V. Jordan,et al.  Inhibition of tamoxifen-stimulated growth of an MCF-7 tumor variant in athymic mice by novel steroidal antiestrogens. , 1989, Cancer research.

[33]  A. Wakeling,et al.  Novel steroidal pure antiestrogens , 1989, Steroids.

[34]  V. Jordan,et al.  Development of tamoxifen-stimulated growth of MCF-7 tumors in athymic mice after long-term antiestrogen administration. , 1988, Cancer research.

[35]  M. Tzukerman,et al.  Human estrogen receptor transactivational capacity is determined by both cellular and promoter context and mediated by two functionally distinct intramolecular regions. , 1994, Molecular endocrinology.