Effect of Cell Phone Distraction on Pediatric Pedestrian Injury Risk

OBJECTIVE. Early adolescents are using cell phones with increasing frequency. Cell phones are known to distract motor vehicle drivers to the point that their safety is jeopardized, but it is unclear if cell phones might also distract child pedestrians. This study was designed to examine the influence of talking on a cell phone for pediatric pedestrian injury risk. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS. Seventy-seven children aged 10 to 11 years old completed simulated road crossings in an immersive, interactive virtual pedestrian environment. In a within-subjects design, children crossed the virtual street 6 times while undistracted and 6 times while distracted by a cell phone conversation with an unfamiliar research assistant. Participants also completed several other experimental tasks hypothesized to predict the impact of distraction while crossing the street and talking on a cell phone. RESULTS. Children's pedestrian safety was compromised when distracted by a cell phone conversation. While distracted, children were less attentive to traffic; left less safe time between their crossing and the next arriving vehicle; experienced more collisions and close calls with oncoming traffic; and waited longer before beginning to cross the street. Analyses testing experience using a cell phone and experience as a pedestrian yielded few significant results, suggesting that distraction on the cell phone might affect children's pedestrian safety no matter what their experience level. There was some indication that younger children and children who are less attentive and more oppositional may be slightly more susceptible to distraction while talking on the cell phone than older, more attentive, and less oppositional children. CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that cell phones distract preadolescent children while crossing streets.

[1]  L. Frank The Society for Research in Child Development , 1935 .

[2]  R. Reitan Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[3]  David N. Lee,et al.  A roadside simulation of road crossing for children , 1984 .

[4]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder : a clinical workbook , 1991 .

[5]  T. Pitcairn,et al.  Errors in young children's decisions about traffic gaps: experiments with roadside simulations. , 1992, British journal of psychology.

[6]  J R Stewart,et al.  Cognitive test performance and crash risk in an older driver population. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  J. Thomson,et al.  Influence of virtual reality training on the roadside crossing judgments of child pedestrians. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  R. Jung Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[9]  T. Bungum,et al.  The association of distraction and caution displayed by pedestrians at a lighted crosswalk , 2005, Journal of Community Health.

[10]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Revision of the Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire , 2006 .

[11]  W. Sturm,et al.  Neuropsychological assessment , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[12]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell-Phone–Induced Driver Distraction , 2007 .

[13]  Benjamin K Barton,et al.  The roles of age, gender, inhibitory control, and parental supervision in children's pedestrian safety. , 2006, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[14]  R. Lowry,et al.  National prevalence and correlates of walking and bicycling to school. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  Richard Wener,et al.  Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Joan Severson,et al.  Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.