Yield dissection models to improve yield: a case study in tomato

Yield as a complex trait may either be genetically improved directly, by identifying QTLs contributing to yield, or indirectly via improvement of underlying components, where parents contribute complementary alleles to different components. We investigated the utility of two yield dissection models in tomato for identifying promising yield components and corresponding QTLs. In a harvest dissection, marketable yield was the product of number of fruits and individual fruit fresh weight. In a biomass dissection, total yield was the product of fruit fresh-dry weight ratio and total fruit dry weight. Data came from a greenhouse experiment with a population of hybrids formed from four-way RILs. Trade-offs were observed between the component traits in both dissections. Genetic improvements were possible by increasing the number of fruits and the total fruit dry weight to offset losses in fruit fresh weight and fruit fresh-dry weight ratio. Most yield QTLs colocalized with component QTLs, offering options for the construction of high-yielding genotypes. An analysis of QTL allelic effects in relation to parental origin emphasized the complementary role of the parents in the construction of desired genotypes. Multi-QTL models were used for the comparison of yield predictions from yield QTLs and predictions from the products of components following multi-QTL models for those components. Component QTLs underlying dissection models were able to predict yield with the same accuracy as yield QTLs in direct predictions. Harvest and biomass yield dissection models may serve as useful tools for yield improvement in tomato by either or both of combining individual component QTLs and multi-QTL component predictions.

[1]  Alain Charcosset,et al.  Genomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions , 2019, Nature Genetics.

[2]  A. Ulrici,et al.  Biomass production and dry matter partitioning of processing tomato under organic vs conventional cropping systems in a Mediterranean environment , 2017 .

[3]  E. Heuvelink,et al.  Physiological and morphological changes over the past 50 years in yield components in tomato. , 2009 .

[4]  C. Messina,et al.  Yield-trait performance landscapes: from theory to application in breeding maize for drought tolerance. , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  A. Fernie,et al.  hi2-1, A QTL which improves harvest index, earliness and alters metabolite accumulation of processing tomatoes , 2010, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[6]  R. Chetelat,et al.  UTILIZATION OF RELATED WILD SPECIES FOR TOMATO IMPROVEMENT , 1995 .

[7]  Walter Griffin,et al.  The Tomato , 2011 .

[8]  E. Buckler,et al.  Breaking the curse of dimensionality to identify causal variants in Breeding 4 , 2018, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[9]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulating the Yield Impacts of Organ-Level Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Drought Response in Maize: A “Gene-to-Phenotype” Modeling Approach , 2009, Genetics.

[10]  Yang Wang,et al.  QTL analysis for yield components and kernel-related traits in maize across multi-environments , 2011, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[11]  Xinyou Yin,et al.  Applying modelling experiences from the past to shape crop systems biology: the need to converge crop physiology and functional genomics. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[12]  D. Zamir,et al.  Unused Natural Variation Can Lift Yield Barriers in Plant Breeding , 2004, PLoS biology.

[13]  V. Sadras.  Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops , 2007 .

[14]  P. Langridge,et al.  Breeding Technologies to Increase Crop Production in a Changing World , 2010, Science.

[15]  François Tardieu,et al.  Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. , 2012, Journal of experimental botany.

[16]  Paul H. C. Eilers,et al.  Correcting for spatial heterogeneity in plant breeding experiments with P-splines , 2018 .

[17]  J. McCallum,et al.  Linkage Mapping of QTL for Seed Yield, Yield Components, and Developmental Traits in Pea , 2005 .

[18]  M. Bindi,et al.  Contribution of Crop Models to Adaptation in Wheat. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[19]  G. Hammer,et al.  Modeling QTL for complex traits: detection and context for plant breeding. , 2009, Current opinion in plant biology.

[20]  Z. Lippman,et al.  An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[21]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Evaluating Plant Breeding Strategies by Simulating Gene Action and Dryland Environment Effects , 2003, Agronomy Journal.

[22]  Yuling Bai,et al.  Domestication and Breeding of Tomatoes: What have We Gained and What Can We Gain in the Future? , 2007, Annals of botany.

[23]  Jacob D. Washburn,et al.  Predictive breeding for maize: Making use of molecular phenotypes, machine learning, and physiological crop models , 2019 .

[24]  María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez,et al.  Modelling spatial trends in sorghum breeding field trials using a two-dimensional P-spline mixed model , 2017, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[25]  J. Staub,et al.  Detection of QTL for yield-related traits using recombinant inbred lines derived from exotic and elite US Western Shipping melon germplasm , 2007, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  I. Rao,et al.  Source-Sink Relationships in Crop Plants and Their Influence on Yield Development and Nutritional Quality , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[27]  M. Soller,et al.  A Simple Method to Calculate Resolving Power and Confidence Interval of QTL Map Location , 1997, Behavior genetics.

[28]  L. Borrás,et al.  Resource distribution and the trade-off between seed number and seed weight: a comparison across crop species , 2010 .

[29]  M. Malosetti,et al.  What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × Environment interactions? , 2016 .

[30]  Frank Technow,et al.  Use of Crop Growth Models with Whole-Genome Prediction: Application to a Maize Multienvironment Trial , 2016 .

[31]  B. Walsh,et al.  Models for navigating biological complexity in breeding improved crop plants. , 2006, Trends in plant science.

[32]  J. Foley,et al.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050 , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  F. Tardieu.  Virtual plants: modelling as a tool for the genomics of tolerance to water deficit. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[34]  Karine Chenu,et al.  From QTLs to Adaptation Landscapes: Using Genotype-To-Phenotype Models to Characterize G×E Over Time , 2019, Front. Plant Sci..

[35]  Paul C. Struik,et al.  Modelling QTL-trait-crop relationships : Past experiences and future prospects , 2016 .

[36]  Martin P. Boer,et al.  Reconstruction of Genome Ancestry Blocks in Multiparental Populations , 2015, Genetics.

[37]  L. Totir,et al.  Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[38]  Victor O. Sadras,et al.  Genetic gain in yield and associated changes in phenotype, trait plasticity and competitive ability of South Australian wheat varieties released between 1958 and 2007 , 2011 .

[39]  Kui Lin,et al.  Genomic analyses provide insights into the history of tomato breeding , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[40]  D. Zamir.  Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  G McLean,et al.  Integrating modelling and phenotyping approaches to identify and screen complex traits: transpiration efficiency in cereals , 2018, Journal of experimental botany.

[42]  Peter Langridge,et al.  Physiological breeding. , 2016, Current opinion in plant biology.

[43]  Daniel W. A. Buchan,et al.  The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution , 2012, Nature.

[44]  R. Hay,et al.  Harvest index: a review of its use in plant breeding and crop physiology , 1995 .

[45]  Gustavo A. Slafer,et al.  Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment , 2014 .

[46]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  Improvement of Predictive Ability by Uniform Coverage of the Target Genetic Space , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[47]  D. Calderini,et al.  Combining high grain number and weight through a DH-population to improve grain yield potential of wheat in high-yielding environments , 2013 .

[48]  F. Badeck,et al.  Changes in yield components, morphological, physiological and fruit quality traits in processing tomato cultivated in Italy since the 1930’s , 2019, Scientia Horticulturae.

[49]  John W. Scott,et al.  High-Density SNP Genotyping of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Reveals Patterns of Genetic Variation Due to Breeding , 2012, PloS one.

[50]  J. J. Magán,et al.  Genetic and QTL analyses of yield and a set of physiological traits in pepper , 2013, Euphytica.

[51]  F. V. van Eeuwijk,et al.  A Mixed-Model Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Analysis for Multiple-Environment Trial Data Using Environmental Covariables for QTL-by-Environment Interactions, With an Example in Maize , 2007, Genetics.

[52]  M. Tester,et al.  Breeding crops to feed 10 billion , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[53]  Brian R. Cullis,et al.  On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data , 2006 .

[54]  Martin J. Kropff,et al.  Use of component analysis in QTL mapping of complex crop traits : A case study on yield in barley , 2002 .

[55]  Francois Tardieu,et al.  Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding. , 2019, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[56]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. , 1997, Science.

[57]  Katsumi Suzuki,et al.  Yield of Japanese Tomato Cultivars Has Been Hampered by a Breeding Focus on Flavor , 2012 .