Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering

Episodic memory depends upon multiple dissociable retrieval processes. Here we investigated the degree to which the processes engaged during successful retrieval are dependent on the properties of the representations that underlie memory for an event. Specifically we examined whether the individual elements of an event can, under some conditions, be unitized, leading to an enhancement of familiarity based responding. Retrieval processes were examined using event-related potential (ERPs) old/new effects, recorded during an associative recognition memory task. The nature of to-be-remembered information was manipulated by using word-pairs as stimuli. At study, participants were asked to remember word-pairs sharing an association (traffic-jam); association+semantic relationship (lemon-orange); or a semantic relationship only (cereal-bread). A behavioural pre-test revealed that association word-pairs were rated as having the most unitized representation. At test, participants were required to recognize if word-pairs were presented in the same pairing as at study, were rearranged from at study, or were entirely new. Behavioural recognition performance was clearly influenced by the nature of the to-be-remembered stimuli, memory being strongest for pairs related purely by association, and weakest for semantic only pairs. ERP old/new effects recorded at test also showed significant differences in the neural correlates of retrieval, depending on stimulus characteristics. The bilateral frontal old/new effect (typically associated with familiarity) was solely elicited by association only pairs. By contrast, the left parietal old/new effect (associated with recollection) was elicited equally by all three conditions. In addition, the late right frontal old/new effect (typically associated with some form of strategic/executive processing) was modulated. This latter effect was initially largest for association only pairs, and subsequently largest for semantic pairs. These findings suggest that the pattern of engagement of familiarity and recollection during successful episodic retrieval is dependent on the properties of the representations that underlie memory for an event.

[1]  James M. Hodgson Informational constraints on pre-lexical priming , 1991 .

[2]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Episodic priming and memory for temporal source: event-related potentials reveal age-related differences in prefrontal functioning. , 1999, Psychology and aging.

[3]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[4]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  How semantic is automatic semantic priming , 1992 .

[5]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[6]  K. Nation,et al.  Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: evidence from semantic priming , 1999, Cognition.

[7]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of memory for words spoken aloud or heard , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval Orientation and the Control of Recollection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  H G Smid,et al.  ERPs to encoding and recognition in two different inter‐item association tasks , 1997, Neuroreport.

[10]  Tim Curran,et al.  Late frontal brain potentials distinguish true and false recognition , 2003, Neuroreport.

[11]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  Exploring the Loss of Semantic Memory in Semantic Dementia: Evidence from a Primed Monitoring Study , 2022 .

[12]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Effects of Semantic and Associative Relatedness on Automatic Priming , 1998 .

[13]  Michael D Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recognition memory exclusion task , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  A. Caramazza,et al.  WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  Boris New,et al.  SEMANTIC AND ASSOCIATIVE PRIMING IN THE MENTAL LEXICON , 2003 .

[16]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming , 1995 .

[18]  J. Fuster The Prefrontal Cortex , 1997 .

[19]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  R. Buckner,et al.  Dissociating Memory Retrieval Processes Using fMRI Evidence that Priming Does Not Support Recognition Memory , 2001, Neuron.

[21]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Theta synchronization during episodic retrieval: neural correlates of conscious awareness. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Novel concepts mediate word retrieval from human episodic associative memory: evidence from event-related potentials , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[23]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recognition judgments , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Mental lexicon : "some words to talk about words" , 2004 .

[25]  J R Hodges,et al.  Episodic memory: insights from semantic dementia. , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  D. Schacter,et al.  Task-specific repetition priming in left inferior prefrontal cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  A. Yonelinas Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  Event-related potentials and the recollection of associative information. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[31]  R B Friedman,et al.  Lexical but not semantic priming in Alzheimer's disease. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[32]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Fluent Conceptual Processing and Explicit Memory for Faces Are Electrophysiologically Distinct , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Is there a “strength effect” in automatic semantic priming? , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[34]  John N. Williams Is Automatic Priming Semantic , 1996 .

[35]  D Friedman,et al.  Item and source memory: differential age effects revealed by event‐related potentials , 1997, Neuroreport.

[36]  M. Lucas,et al.  Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Keith A Hutchison,et al.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[38]  Ken A Paller,et al.  The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to word- and sentence-level context: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2005, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[40]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition , 1973 .

[41]  D. Schacter,et al.  Associative recognition in Alzheimer's disease: evidence for impaired recall-to-reject. , 2004, Neuropsychology.

[42]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potential studies of associative recognition and recall: electrophysiological evidence for context dependent retrieval processes. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  Michael Wilson MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 2001 .

[44]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[45]  T. Curran Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Brain Potentials Reflect Behavioral Differences in True and False Recognition , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Rugg,et al.  Recognition memory for new associations: electrophysiological evidence for the role of recollection , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[49]  R. Passingham The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy physiology and neurophysiology of the frontal lobe J. M. Fuster. Raven Press, New York (1980), 222 pp., $29.92 , 1981, Neuroscience.

[50]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[51]  Emilie Marcus,et al.  Growth and Change at Neuron , 2001, Neuron.