Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups

This study offers an examination of data richness (i.e., topic-related data, topic unrelated data, researcher ratings of data richness, word count, and linguistic characteristics of data richness) trade-offs between face-to-face (FTF), online text-only and online audiovisual focus group mediums. Two focus group sessions were held for each type of medium. Data were analyzed using systematic content analysis and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Findings showed that although online audiovisual focus groups show potential for producing data similar in richness to FTF focus groups, researchers should carefully consider the potential distractions that manifested in this study as a result of the medium itself, likely due to its novelty as a group communication medium. Online text-only groups did not facilitate rich data, as operationalized in this study, and also had a lower amount of data related to the topic of the groups due to more socializing and off-topic discussion. As the first study to empirically examine the potential of data from focus groups facilitated via webcam (online audiovisual), it concludes, the technology offers similar data richness to FTF focus groups.

[1]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[2]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Psychological aspects of natural language. use: our words, our selves. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  P. Brink.  On reliability and validity in qualitative research. , 1987, Western journal of nursing research.

[4]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[5]  M. Sandelowski.  Real qualitative researchers do not count: the use of numbers in qualitative research. , 2001, Research in nursing & health.

[6]  Sandra van Dulmen,et al.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[7]  M. Kendall,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1959 .

[8]  Caroline Stenbacka.  Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own , 2001 .

[9]  Emotions as analytic tools: qualitative research, feelings and psychotherapeutic insight , 2001 .

[10]  S. Steinmetz,et al.  Random House Webster's unabridged dictionary , 1997 .

[11]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Elisabeth Brüggen,et al.  A Critical Comparison of Offline Focus Groups, Online Focus Groups and E-Delphi , 2009 .

[13]  K. Hergenrather,et al.  Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers , 2003, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  S. A. Pedersen.  [Validity of qualitative research]. , 1990, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[15]  L. Connelly.  Grounded theory. , 2013, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[16]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  The self in social psychology. , 1999 .

[17]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[18]  Souraya Sidani,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative methods:: Is There an Alternative? , 1995 .

[19]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus groups : a practical guide for applied research / by Richard A. Krueger , 1989 .

[20]  Karl R. Popper.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery. , 1977 .

[21]  Joy A. Frechtling,et al.  Characteristics of the Discussion in Online and Face-to-Face Focus Groups , 2002 .

[22]  S. Lambert,et al.  Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[23]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[24]  R. Lissitz,et al.  Computer-Mediated Focus Groups , 2000, Evaluation review.

[25]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[26]  Sean Hammond,et al.  Research Methods in Psychology , 1994 .

[27]  N. Leech,et al.  An Array of Qualitative Data Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. , 2007 .

[28]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. , 1987 .

[29]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[30]  J. Morse,et al.  Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[31]  Donna J. Reid,et al.  Online Focus Groups: An In-depth Comparison of Computer-mediated and Conventional Focus Group Discussions , 2005 .

[32]  H. Edmunds.  The Focus Group Research Handbook , 1999 .

[33]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  The self in social psychology , 1980 .

[34]  A. Coyle.  Introduction to qualitative psychological research , 2007 .

[35]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[36]  Kate Stewart,et al.  Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research , 2005 .

[37]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[38]  Jane Ogden,et al.  The role of topic, interviewee and question in predicting rich interview data in the field of health research. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[39]  A. Coyle,et al.  Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology , 2016 .

[40]  Lyn Turney,et al.  Virtual Focus Groups: New Frontiers in Research , 2005 .

[41]  M. Birnbaum.  Human research and data collection via the internet. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[42]  Heiner Meulemann,et al.  Mass Media Research , 2009 .

[43]  김만두,et al.  Interviewing , 2018, The Public Relations Writer’s Handbook.

[44]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Problems of Reliability and Validity in Ethnographic Research , 1982 .

[45]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[46]  W. Duggleby.  What About Focus Group Interaction Data? , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[47]  I. Dey.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[48]  Roger J. Rezabek,et al.  Online Focus Groups: Electronic Discussions for Research , 2000 .

[49]  D. Canter,et al.  The Research interview, uses and approaches , 1986 .

[50]  C. Gunawardena.  Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences , 1995 .

[51]  Murrey Olmsted,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Focus Groups , 2003 .

[52]  Ian Dey,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[53]  Jonathan A. Smith.  Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods , 2006, QMiP Bulletin.

[54]  J. Kitzinger.  The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants , 1994 .

[55]  Kristin L. Galloway.  Focus groups in the virtual world: Implications for the future of evaluation , 2011 .

[56]  A. Joinson.  Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .