More equal but less mobile? Education financing and intergenerational mobility in Italy and in the US

A state school system should be expected to reduce income inequality and to make intergenerational mobility easier. It is therefore somewhat surprising to observe that Italy, in comparison to the United States, displays less inequality between occupational incomes, but lower intergenerational upward mobility, not only between occupations, but also between education levels. In this paper we provide evidence on this empirical puzzle, and offer a theoretical explanation building around the idea that even if in Italy moving up on the social ladder is easier, the incentive to move may be lower, making mobility less likely.

[1]  Casey B. Mulligan,et al.  Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality , 1998 .

[2]  P. Gottschalk,et al.  Cross National Comparisons of Levels and Trends in Inequality , 1995 .

[3]  R. Boudon,et al.  Mathematical structures of social mobility , 1973 .

[4]  Robert C. Marshall,et al.  Mobility indexes in continuous-time Markov-chains , 1986 .

[5]  John Conlisk,et al.  Ranking mobility matrices , 1989 .

[6]  Gary Solon,et al.  Intergenerational Income Mobility in the United States , 1992 .

[7]  K. Couch,et al.  Intergenerational Correlations in Labor Market Status: A Comparison of the United States and Germany , 1997 .

[8]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  The Bell Curve , 1994 .

[9]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[10]  A. Schizzerotto,et al.  La mobilità sociale in Italia , 1994 .

[11]  Valentino Dardanoni,et al.  Measuring Social Mobility , 1993 .

[12]  Richard Rogerson,et al.  Income Distribution, Communities, and the Quality of Public Education , 1996 .

[13]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries , 1994 .

[14]  Daniel Tsiddon,et al.  Technological Progress, Mobility, and Economic Growth , 1996 .

[15]  Paul M. Sommers,et al.  Eigenvalue immobility measures for Markov chains 1 , 1979 .

[16]  Roland Bénabou,et al.  Heterogeneity, Stratification, and Growth: Macroeconomic Implications of Community Structure and School Finance , 1996 .

[17]  Christopher L. Erickson,et al.  Wage Differentials in Italy: Market Forces, Institutions, and Inflation , 1994 .

[18]  J. Conlisk.  Monotone mobility matrices , 1990 .

[19]  F. Nielsen,et al.  The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. , 1995 .

[20]  John Bibby,et al.  Methods of measuring mobility , 1975 .

[21]  F. Cowell,et al.  Measuring income mobility with dirty data , 1998 .

[22]  J. Goldthorpe,et al.  The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies , 1993 .

[23]  John Geweke,et al.  Mobility Indices in Continuous Time Markov Chains , 1986 .

[24]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Occupational Choice and the Process of Development , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  A. Atkinson.  On Intergenerational Income Mobility in Britain , 1980 .

[26]  Joseph Zeira,et al.  Income Distribution and Macroeconomics , 1988 .

[27]  Otis Dudley Duncan,et al.  A socioeconomic index for all occupations. , 1996 .

[28]  David J. Zimmerman,et al.  Regression Toward Mediocrity in Economic Stature , 1992 .

[29]  R. Bénabou.  Equity and Efficiency in Human Capital Investment: The Local Connection , 1996 .

[30]  A. Shorrocks,et al.  The Measurement of Mobility , 1978 .

[31]  D. Checchi.  Education and Intergenerational Mobility in Occupations: A Comparative Study , 1997 .

[32]  P. Gottschalk,et al.  Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality , 1997 .

[33]  B. Ravikumar,et al.  Public versus Private Investment in Human Capital: Endogenous Growth and Income Inequality , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.