Inferences during Story Comprehension: Cortical Recruitment Affected by Predictability of Events and Working Memory Capacity

Although it has been consistently shown that readers generate bridging inferences during story comprehension, little is currently known about the neural substrates involved when people generate inferences and how these substrates shift with factors that facilitate or impede inferences, such as whether inferences are highly predictable or unpredictable. In the current study, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal increased for highly predictable inferences (relative to events that were previously explicitly stated) bilaterally in both the superior temporal gyri and the inferior frontal gyri. Interestingly, high working memory capacity comprehenders, who are most likely to generate inferences during story comprehension, showed greater signal increases than did low working memory capacity comprehenders in the right superior temporal gyrus and right inferior frontal gyrus. When comprehenders needed to draw unpredictable inferences in a story, fMRI signal increased relative to explicitly stated events in the left inferior gyrus and in the middle frontal gyrus, irrespective of working memory capacity. These results suggest that the predictability of a text (i.e., the causal constraint) and the working memory capacity of the comprehender influence the different neural substrates involved during the generation of bridging inferences.

[1]  S. Virtue,et al.  Hemispheric processing of inferences: The effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[2]  M. Just,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article How the Brain Processes Causal Inferences in Text A Theoretical Account of Generation and Integration Component Processes Utilizing Both Cerebral Hemispheres , 2022 .

[3]  J. A. Frost,et al.  Conceptual Processing during the Conscious Resting State: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Jung-Beeman Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Murray Singer,et al.  Individual differences in bridging inference processes , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[6]  David A. Balota Comprehension Processes in Reading. , 1990 .

[7]  P. Broek,et al.  The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. , 2002 .

[8]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  Emotional and Temporal Aspects of Situation Model Processing during Text Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  P. Broek The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. , 1990 .

[10]  D. Collins,et al.  Automatic 3D Intersubject Registration of MR Volumetric Data in Standardized Talairach Space , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Recovering Meaning Left Prefrontal Cortex Guides Controlled Semantic Retrieval , 2001, Neuron.

[12]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[14]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Manuel G. Calvo,et al.  Working Memory Capacity and Time Course of Predictive Inferences , 2000, Memory.

[16]  T. Ditman,et al.  Building coherence: A framework for exploring the breakdown of links across clause boundaries in schizophrenia , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Right and Left Hemisphere Cooperation for Drawing Predictive and Coherence Inferences during Normal Story Comprehension , 2000, Brain and Language.

[19]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[20]  Murray Singer,et al.  The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  S. Duffy,et al.  Degree of causal relatedness and memory , 1987 .

[24]  James E. Hoffman,et al.  Individual Differences in Inference Generation: An ERP Analysis , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate and the Monitoring of Response Conflict: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Overt Verb Generation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Parrish,et al.  Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension , 2006, Brain Research.

[27]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of cognitive operations in the human brain. , 1988, Science.

[28]  J. Desmond,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for right-hemisphere involvement in processing unusual semantic relationships , 2000 .

[29]  Tracy Linderholm,et al.  Predictive Inference Generation as a Function of Working Memory Capacity and Causal Text Constraints , 2002 .

[30]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight , 2004, PLoS biology.

[31]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994, Psychological review.

[32]  A. Benton Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain. , 1984 .