On the effect of demand randomness on a price/quantity setting firm

Replenishment and pricing decisions are of great importance to firms. Traditionally replenishment and pricing strategies are determined by separate units of a firm, the former by production and the latter by marketing. In determining these two strategies, firms frequently have to face two challenges. One stems from a lack of coordination between production and marketing, which leads to revenue loss or excess inventory. The other is caused by lack of information when making these two decisions. That is, firms usually have to make decisions when market information is poor. We consider the joint effects of coordination and information when market demand becomes more variable in the sense of a specific mean preserving transformation. We have three main findings. First, when these two strategies are coordinated by the Headquarters (HQ) of the firm, the HQ uses pricing and inventory as two instruments to manage uncertainty. How exactly increasing demand variability affects the decisions depends on the type of demand uncertainty faced. In particular, for additive demand uncertainty, both price and service level decrease in demand variability, whereas for multiplicative demand uncertainty, they both increase in demand variability. Second, the value of information increases with the level of demand variability, suggesting that it is more beneficial to have information when demand is more variable. The impact of demand variability on the value of coordination, however, is indeterminate. Furthermore, perfect information has more value than perfect coordination if and only if demand variability is high. Third, coordinating these two decisions reduces the value of obtaining the demand information and similarly coordination is more valuable when the demand information is unavailable than otherwise.

[1]  T. M. Whitin Inventory Control and Price Theory , 1955 .

[2]  E. Mills Uncertainty and Price Theory , 1959 .

[3]  Richard E. Barlow,et al.  Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Probability Models , 1976 .

[4]  Sheldon M. Ross,et al.  Stochastic Processes , 2018, Gauge Integral Structures for Stochastic Calculus and Quantum Electrodynamics.

[5]  Yigal Gerchak,et al.  On the Effect of Demand Randomness on Inventories and Costs , 1992, Oper. Res..

[6]  Hau L. Lee Managing supply chain inventory: Pitfalls and opportunities , 1992 .

[7]  Jing-Sheng Song The Effect of Leadtime Uncertainty in a Simple Stochastic Inventory Model , 1994 .

[8]  L. Eeckhoudt,et al.  The Risk-Averse and Prudent Newsboy , 1995 .

[9]  Sudheer Gupta,et al.  Process Innovation, Product Differentiation, and Channel Structure: Strategic Incentives in a Duopoly , 1998 .

[10]  Marc Salomon,et al.  How Larger Demand Variability May Lead to Lower Costs in the Newsvendor Problem , 1998, Oper. Res..

[11]  A. Tsay The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives , 1999 .

[12]  Jan A. Van Mieghem,et al.  Price Versus Production Postponement: Capacity and Competition , 1999 .

[13]  Maqbool Dada,et al.  Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions , 1999, Oper. Res..

[14]  Gérard P. Cachon Competitive Supply Chain Inventory Management , 1999 .

[15]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain , 1999 .

[16]  Vipul Agrawal,et al.  Impact of Uncertainty and Risk Aversion on Price and Order Quantity in the Newsvendor Problem , 2000, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[17]  Hau L. Lee Ultimate Enterprise Value Creation Using Demand-Based Management , 2001 .

[18]  Hau L. Lee Ultimate Enterprise Value Creation Using Demand-Based Management , 2001 .

[19]  Qing Li,et al.  Coordinating Replenishment and Pricing in a Firm , 2002, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[20]  Katrin Ostertag Transaction cost economics , 2003 .

[21]  Moshe Shaked,et al.  Univariate Variability Orders , 2007 .

[22]  T. Davis Effective supply chain management , 2020, Strategic Direction.