Deletion lengthening at chromosomes 6q and 16q targets multiple tumor suppressor genes and is associated with an increasingly poor prognosis in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is characterized by recurrent deletions that can considerably vary in size. We hypothesized that large deletions develop from small deletions and that this “deletion lengthening” might have a “per se” carcinogenic role through a combinatorial effect of multiple down regulated genes. In vitro knockdown of 37 genes located inside the 6q12-q22 deletion region identified 4 genes with additive tumor suppressive effects, further supporting a role of the deletion size for cancer aggressiveness. Employing fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis on prostate cancer tissue microarrays, we determined the deletion size at 6q and 16q in more than 3,000 tumors. 16q and 6q deletion length was strongly linked to poor clinical outcome and this effect was even stronger if the length of both deletions was combined. To study deletion lengthening in cancer progression we eventually analyzed the entire cancers from 317 patients for 6q and 16q deletion length heterogeneity and found that the deletion expanded within 50-60% of 6q and 16q deleted cancers. Taken together, these data suggest continuous “deletion lengthening” as a key mechanism for prostate cancer progression leading to parallel down regulation of genes with tumor suppressive properties, some of which act cooperatively.

[1]  G. Sauter,et al.  Concurrent deletion of 16q23 and PTEN is an independent prognostic feature in prostate cancer , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[2]  Andrew Menzies,et al.  Analysis of the Genetic Phylogeny of Multifocal Prostate Cancer Identifies Multiple Independent Clonal Expansions in Neoplastic and Morphologically Normal Prostate Tissue , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[3]  J. Squire,et al.  Recurrent copy number alterations in prostate cancer: an in silico meta-analysis of publicly available genomic data. , 2014, Cancer genetics.

[4]  Chris Sander,et al.  Copy number alteration burden predicts prostate cancer relapse , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  A. Schreurs,et al.  Involvement of small ArfGAP1 (SMAP1), a novel Arf6-specific GTPase-activating protein, in microsatellite instability oncogenesis , 2014, Oncogene.

[6]  Stefan Kurtz,et al.  FISH Oracle 2: a web server for integrative visualization of genomic data in cancer research , 2014, Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics.

[7]  S. Elledge,et al.  Cumulative Haploinsufficiency and Triplosensitivity Drive Aneuploidy Patterns and Shape the Cancer Genome , 2013, Cell.

[8]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Recurrent deletion of 3p13 targets multiple tumour suppressor genes and defines a distinct subgroup of aggressive ERG fusion‐positive prostate cancers , 2013, The Journal of pathology.

[9]  J. Korbel,et al.  Genomic deletion of MAP3K7 at 6q12-22 is associated with early PSA recurrence in prostate cancer and absence of TMPRSS2:ERG fusions , 2013, Modern Pathology.

[10]  V. Beneš,et al.  Integrative genomic analyses reveal an androgen-driven somatic alteration landscape in early-onset prostate cancer. , 2013, Cancer cell.

[11]  R. Everett,et al.  Components of Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Bodies (ND10) Act Cooperatively To Repress Herpesvirus Infection , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[12]  J. Brooks,et al.  Recurrent deletion of CHD1 in prostate cancer with relevance to cell invasiveness , 2012, Oncogene.

[13]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  Cancer Vulnerabilities Unveiled by Genomic Loss , 2012, Cell.

[14]  M. Meyerson,et al.  Recurrent Hemizygous Deletions in Cancers May Optimize Proliferative Potential , 2012, Science.

[15]  Michael Wigler,et al.  A cluster of cooperating tumor-suppressor gene candidates in chromosomal deletions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  M. Bustin,et al.  The chromatin-binding protein HMGN3 stimulates histone acetylation and transcription across the Glyt1 gene. , 2012, The Biochemical journal.

[17]  J. Kench,et al.  Low AZGP1 expression predicts for recurrence in margin‐positive, localized prostate cancer , 2011, The Prostate.

[18]  R. Foà,et al.  13q14 Deletion size and number of deleted cells both influence prognosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2011, Genes, chromosomes & cancer.

[19]  Sascha Steinbiss,et al.  FISH Oracle: a web server for flexible visualization of DNA copy number data in a genomic context , 2011, Journal of Clinical Bioinformatics.

[20]  P. Lehner,et al.  HRD1 and UBE2J1 target misfolded MHC class I heavy chains for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  R. Everett,et al.  PML isoforms I and II participate in PML-dependent restriction of HSV-1 replication , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[22]  P. Pandolfi,et al.  Haplo‐insufficiency: a driving force in cancer , 2011, The Journal of pathology.

[23]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer , 2010, Nature.

[24]  Rafael J. Yáñez-Muñoz,et al.  Chromosome rearrangement associated inactivation of tumour suppressor genes in prostate cancer. , 2011, American journal of cancer research.

[25]  Jing-zhong Sun,et al.  The prognostic significance of WWOX expression in patients with breast cancer and its association with the basal-like phenotype , 2011, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[26]  C. Sander,et al.  Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[27]  G. Sauter,et al.  Chromosome 8p Deletions and 8q Gains are Associated with Tumor Progression and Poor Prognosis in Prostate Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[28]  S. Varambally,et al.  Induced Chromosomal Proximity and Gene Fusions in Prostate Cancer , 2009, Science.

[29]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  High‐resolution array CGH identifies novel regions of genomic alteration in intermediate‐risk prostate cancer , 2009, The Prostate.

[30]  G Parmigiani,et al.  Androgen-induced programs for prostate epithelial growth and invasion arise in embryogenesis and are reactivated in cancer , 2008, Oncogene.

[31]  M. O’Bryan,et al.  The CAP superfamily: cysteine-rich secretory proteins, antigen 5, and pathogenesis-related 1 proteins--roles in reproduction, cancer, and immune defense. , 2008, Endocrine reviews.

[32]  J. Brooks,et al.  Genomic profiling reveals alternative genetic pathways of prostate tumorigenesis. , 2007, Cancer research.

[33]  Jianfeng Xu,et al.  Deletion of a Small Consensus Region at 6q15, Including the MAP3K7 Gene, Is Significantly Associated with High-Grade Prostate Cancers , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[34]  Jin Woo Kim,et al.  DNA copy number alterations in prostate cancers: A combined analysis of published CGH studies , 2007, The Prostate.

[35]  R. Everett,et al.  PML Contributes to a Cellular Mechanism of Repression of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection That Is Inactivated by ICP0 , 2006, Journal of Virology.

[36]  Yutaka Miura,et al.  Frequent somatic mutations of the transcription factor ATBF1 in human prostate cancer , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[37]  D. Guertin,et al.  Phosphorylation and Regulation of Akt/PKB by the Rictor-mTOR Complex , 2005, Science.

[38]  A. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Integration of high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of chromosome 16q with expression array data refines common regions of loss at 16q23–qter and identifies underlying candidate tumor suppressor genes in prostate cancer , 2004, Oncogene.

[39]  B. Teicher,et al.  Antitumor alkylating agents: in vitro cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity studies , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[40]  D. Birnbaum,et al.  Chromosome arm 8p and cancer: a fragile hypothesis. , 2003, The Lancet. Oncology.

[41]  A. Bookout,et al.  Quantitative real-time PCR protocol for analysis of nuclear receptor signaling pathways , 2003, Nuclear receptor signaling.

[42]  T. Stamey,et al.  Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2002, Urology.

[43]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[44]  Anindya Dutta,et al.  Architecture of the Human Origin Recognition Complex* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  J. Minna,et al.  Loss of expression and aberrant methylation of the CDH13 (H-cadherin) gene in breast and lung carcinomas. , 2001, Cancer research.

[46]  J. Kononen,et al.  Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[47]  M. Gerdes,et al.  Purification of a Novel Protein (ps20) from Urogenital Sinus Mesenchymal Cells with Growth Inhibitory Properties in Vitro(*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  A. Knudson Overview: genes that predispose to cancer. , 1991, Mutation research.

[49]  A. Knudson Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblastoma. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.