Individual patterns of motor deficits evident in movement distribution analysis

Recent studies in rehabilitation have shown potential benefits of patient-initiated exploratory practice. Such findings, however, lead to new challenges in how to quantify and interpret movement patterns. We posit that changes in coordination are most evident in statistical distributions of movements. In a test on 10 chronic stroke subjects practicing for 3 days, we found that inter-quartile range of motion did not show improvement. However, a multivariate Gaussians analysis required more complexity at the end of training. Beyond simply characterizing movement, linear discriminant classification of each patient's movement distribution also identified that each patient's motor deficit left a unique signature. The greatest distinctions were observed in the space of accelerations (rather than position or velocity). These results suggest that unique deficits are best detected with such a distribution analysis, and also point to the need for customized interventions that consider such patient-specific motor deficits.

[1]  David J Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Manually‐Assisted Versus Robotic‐Assisted Body Weight−Supported Treadmill Training in Spinal Cord Injury: What Is the Role of Each? , 2010, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Dewald,et al.  Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis , 2001, Muscle & nerve.

[3]  S. Neubauer,et al.  High-dose 17beta-estradiol treatment prevents development of heart failure post-myocardial infarction in the rat. , 2007, Basic research in cardiology.

[4]  T. Jarus,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Processes and Task Complexity on Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of Motor Skills , 2001, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[5]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning through the combination of primitives. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  James L. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of negative viscosity as upper extremity training for stroke survivors , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[7]  Felix C Huang,et al.  Visual and Haptic Feedback Contribute to Tuning and Online Control During Object Manipulation , 2007, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  E. Thelen,et al.  The transition to reaching: mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. , 1993, Child development.

[9]  Felix C Huang,et al.  Manual skill generalization enhanced by negative viscosity. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Voluntary muscle strength in hemiparesis: distribution of weakness at the elbow. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[11]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Assessment of strength deficits in eight paretic upper extremity muscle groups of stroke patients with hemiplegia. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[12]  Jun Nakanishi,et al.  Dynamical Movement Primitives: Learning Attractor Models for Motor Behaviors , 2013, Neural Computation.

[13]  Tal Jarus,et al.  Effects of Cognitive Processes and Task Complexity on Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of Motor Skills , 2001 .

[14]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  Individual Factors in Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy after Stroke , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  J. Adair,et al.  Performance-Based Everyday Functioning after Stroke: Relationship with IADL Questionnaire and Neurocognitive Performance , 2011, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[16]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  Dynamic primitives of motor behavior , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[17]  M. Arbib,et al.  Infant grasp learning: a computational model , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  M. Levin,et al.  Deficits in the coordination of agonist and antagonist muscles in stroke patients: implications for normal motor control , 2000, Brain Research.

[19]  John McGuire,et al.  Bilateral assessment of functional tasks for robot-assisted therapy applications , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[20]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[21]  R. Hanlon Motor learning following unilateral stroke. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  C. Braun,et al.  Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Retrospective Assessment of Initial Stroke Severity: Comparison of the NIH Stroke Scale and the Canadian Neurological Scale , 2001, Stroke.

[24]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  R. Teasell,et al.  An Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation , 2003, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[26]  Catherine Mercier,et al.  Differences in the magnitude and direction of forces during a submaximal matching task in hemiparetic subjects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Thanassis Rikakis,et al.  A computational framework for constructing interactive feedback for assisting motor learning , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[30]  S. Neubauer,et al.  High-dose 17β–estradiol treatment prevents development of heart failure post–myocardial infarction in the rat , 2006, Basic Research in Cardiology.

[31]  Olivier White,et al.  Use-Dependent and Error-Based Learning of Motor Behaviors , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[33]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  W. Rymer,et al.  Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.