Temporal behavior of a solute cloud in a heterogeneous porous medium: 1. Point‐like injection

We investigate the temporal behavior of transport coefficients in a model for transport of a solute through a spatially heterogeneous saturated aquifer. In the framework of a stochastic approach we derive explicit expressions for the temporal behavior of the center-of-mass velocity and the dispersion of the concentration distribution after a point-like injection of solute at time t=0, using a second-order perturbation expansion. The model takes into account local variations in the hydraulic conductivity (which, in turn, induce local fluctuations in the groundwater flow velocities) and in the chemical adsorption properties of the medium (which lead to a spatially varying local retardation factor). In the given perturbation theory approach the various heterogeneity-induced contributions can be systematically traced back to fluctuations in these quantities and to cross correlations between them. We analyze two conceptually different definitions for the resulting dispersion coefficient: the “effective”dispersion coefficient which is derived from the average over the centered second moments of the spatial concentration distributions in every realization and the “ensemble” dispersion coefficient which follows from the second moment of the ensemble-averaged concentration distribution. The first quantity characterizes the dispersion in a typical realization of the medium, whereas the second one describes the (formal) dispersion properties of the ensemble as a whole. We give explicit analytic expressions for both quantities as functions of time and show that for finite times their temporal behavior is remarkably different. The ensemble dispersion coefficient which is usually evaluated in the literature considerably overestimates the dispersion typically found in one given realization of the medium. From our explicit results we identify two relevant timescales separating regimes of qualitatively and quantitatively different temporal behavior: The shorter of the two scales is set by the advective transport of the solute cloud over one disorder correlation length, whereas the second, much larger one, is related to the dispersive spreading over the same distance. Only for times much larger than this second scale, do the effective and the ensemble dispersion coefficient become equivalent because of mixing caused by the local transversal dispersion. The formulae are applied to the Borden experiment data. It is concluded that the observed dispersion coefficient matches the effective dispersion coefficient at finite times proposed in this paper very well.

[1]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Plume scale-dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers: 1. Lagrangian analysis in a stratified aquifer , 1993 .

[2]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Temporal behavior of a solute cloud in a heterogeneous porous medium: 2. Spatially extended injection , 2000 .

[3]  M. Shvidler Correlation model of transport in Random fields , 1993 .

[4]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Three-dimensional spatial moments analysis of the Borden Tracer Test , 1991 .

[5]  G. Batchelor Diffusion in a field of homogeneous turbulence , 1952, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[6]  Z. J. Kabala,et al.  A stochastic model of reactive solute transport with time‐varying velocity in a heterogeneous aquifer , 1991 .

[7]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Concentration fluctuations and dilution in two-dimensionally periodic heterogeneous porous media , 1996 .

[8]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[9]  E. Sudicky,et al.  Spatial Variability of Strontium Distribution Coefficients and Their Correlation With Hydraulic Conductivity in the Canadian Forces Base Borden Aquifer , 1991 .

[10]  Andrew F. B. Tompson,et al.  Numerical simulation of solute transport in three-dimensional, randomly heterogeneous porous media , 1990 .

[11]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Analysis of one‐dimensional solute transport through porous media with spatially variable retardation factor , 1990 .

[12]  R. L. Naff,et al.  Nonreactive and reactive solute transport in three-dimensional heterogeneous porous media: Mean displacement, plume spreading, and uncertainty , 1994 .

[13]  Wolfgang Kinzelbach,et al.  Asymptotic transport parameters in a heterogeneous porous medium: Comparison of two ensemble-averaging procedures , 1999 .

[14]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Plume scale‐dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Eulerian analysis and three‐dimensional aquifers , 1993 .

[15]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in a stratified aquifer , 1979 .

[16]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Transport in heterogeneous porous formations: Spatial moments, ergodicity, and effective dispersion , 1990 .

[17]  G. Batchelor Diffusion in a Field of Homogeneous Turbulence. I. Eulerian Analysis , 1949 .

[18]  A. Scheidegger General Theory of Dispersion in Porous Media , 1961 .

[19]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Analysis of macrodispersion through volume-averaging: Moment equations , 1992 .

[20]  E. Sudicky A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[21]  Aldo Fiori,et al.  Finite Peclet Extensions of Dagan's Solutions to Transport in Anisotropic Heterogeneous Formations , 1996 .

[22]  M. Dentz,et al.  Temporal behaviour of a solute cloud in a chemically heterogeneous porous medium , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  R. L. Naff On the nature of the dispersive flux in saturated heterogeneous porous media. , 1990 .

[24]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic analysis of sorption macrokinetics in heterogeneous aquifers , 1996 .

[25]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Linear equilibrium adsorbing solute transport in physically and chemically heterogeneous porous formations. 1. Analytical solutions , 1993 .

[26]  G. Dagan Time‐dependent macrodispersion for solute transport in anisotropic heterogeneous aquifers , 1988 .

[27]  G. Matheron,et al.  Is transport in porous media always diffusive? A counterexample , 1980 .

[28]  G. Dagan Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[29]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Prediction by the method of moments of transport in a heterogeneous formation , 1988 .

[31]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Time-Dependent Dispersion of Nonergodic Plumes in Two-Dimensional Heterogeneous Aquifers , 1997 .

[32]  G. Dagan Dispersion of a passive solute in non-ergodic transport by steady velocity fields in heterogeneous formations , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[33]  David L. Freyberg,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 2. Spatial moments and the advection and dispersion of nonreactive tracers , 1986 .

[34]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Nonergodic Solute Transport in Three‐Dimensional Heterogeneous Isotropic Aquifers , 1996 .

[35]  Allan D. Woodbury,et al.  The geostatistical characteristics of the borden aquifer , 1991 .

[36]  M. Celia,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 2, Analysis of spatial moments for a nonreactive tracer , 1991 .