Sliders Versus Storyboards - Investigating Interaction Design for Mobile Video Browsing

We present a comparative study of two different interfaces for mobile video browsing on tablet devices following two basic concepts - storyboard designs representing a video’s content in a grid-like arrangement of static images extracted from the file, and slider interfaces enabling users to interactively skim a video’s content at random speed and direction along the timeline. Our results confirm the usefulness and usability of both designs but do not suggest a clear benefit of either of them in the direct comparison, recommending – among other identified design issues – an interface integrating both concepts.

[1]  Klaus Schöffmann,et al.  3-D Interfaces to Improve the Performance of Visual Known-Item Search , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[2]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Consuming video on mobile devices , 2007, CHI.

[3]  Dimitrios Paris Darzentas,et al.  Quantity versus quality: the role of layout and interaction complexity in thumbnail-based video retrieval interfaces , 2012, ICMR.

[4]  KanadeTakeo,et al.  Intelligent Access to Digital Video , 1996 .

[5]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Talking about tactile experiences , 2013, CHI.

[6]  Qibin Sun,et al.  Video Browsing on Handheld Devices—Interface Designs for the Next Generation of Mobile Video Players , 2008, IEEE MultiMedia.

[7]  Cees Snoek,et al.  Keep moving!: revisiting thumbnails for mobile video retrieval , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[8]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations , 1996, Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages.

[9]  Wolfgang Hürst,et al.  Interactive video browsing on mobile devices , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[10]  Shingo Uchihashi,et al.  An interactive comic book presentation for exploring video , 2000, CHI.

[11]  Cees Snoek,et al.  Size Matters! How Thumbnail Number, Size, and Motion Influence Mobile Video Retrieval , 2011, MMM.

[12]  Min Chen,et al.  State of the Art Report on Video‐Based Graphics and Video Visualization , 2012, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[13]  Matthieu Guillaumin,et al.  Combining Image-Level and Segment-Level Models for Automatic Annotation , 2012, MMM.

[14]  Frank Hopfgartner,et al.  Video browsing interfaces and applications: a review , 2010 .

[15]  Judith Masthoff,et al.  Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video , 2008 .

[16]  Duy-Dinh Le,et al.  The Video Browser Showdown: a live evaluation of interactive video search tools , 2013, International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval.

[17]  Wolfgang Hürst,et al.  One-handed mobile video browsing , 2008, UXTV '08.

[18]  Alexander G. Hauptmann,et al.  Adjustable filmstrips and skims as abstractions for a digital video library , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries.

[19]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Key frame preview techniques for video browsing , 1998, DL '98.

[20]  Klaus Schöffmann,et al.  Mobile video browsing with the ThumbBrowser , 2013, MM '13.

[21]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Intelligent Access to Digital Video: Informedia Project , 1996, Computer.