An empirical test of contributing factors to different forms of maverick buying

Maverick buying is the non-compliant, off-contract buying of goods and services, for which an established procurement process is in place based on pre-negotiated contracts with selected suppliers. The phenomenon is common in organizations using organization-wide frame agreements. Maverick buying prevents the full utilization of volume discounts negotiated, and also raises unnecessary process costs. This paper focuses on three types of maverick buying drawn from previous literature. Survey data on Finnish governmental procurement is used to test whether characteristics of users and their work contexts, drawn from literature in organizational behavior, affect the reasons for engaging in maverick buying. The results provide guidance on how different types of maverick buying in an organization can be reduced. Specifically, it is shown that all types of maverick buying can be reduced by limiting the task autonomy of the buyers. Additionally, different types of training can help prevent the behavior. Investing in reward and sanction systems, however, does not appear to be helpful in reducing the three types of maverick buying tested for in this study.

[1]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis , 1966 .

[2]  Marjolein C.J. Caniëls,et al.  Do all suppliers dislike electronic reverse auctions , 2009 .

[3]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2007 .

[4]  Gretchen M. Spreitzer,et al.  Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance , 2004 .

[5]  O. C. Ferrell,et al.  A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing , 1985 .

[6]  S. Rogelberg,et al.  Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 2010 .

[7]  Overcoming demand management problems: The scope for improving reactive and proactive supply management in the uk health service , 2005 .

[8]  Christine A. Henle,et al.  The Role of Ethical Ideology in Workplace Deviance , 2005 .

[9]  Suresh Cuganesan,et al.  Intra-organisational influences in procurement networks controls: The impacts of information technology , 2006 .

[10]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  J. Lefkowitz,et al.  Individual and Organizational Antecedents of Misconduct in Organizations , 2009 .

[12]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches , 1985 .

[13]  Jeanne M. Brett,et al.  Agency Theory and Variable Pay Compensation Strategies , 1996 .

[14]  Mark Goh,et al.  Purchase-Related Factors and Buying Center Structure , 1999 .

[15]  Alistair Brandon-Jones,et al.  Impact of e-procurement: Experiences from implementation in the UK public sector , 2007 .

[16]  Subroto Roy.  OK you are now an approved supplier—but you still do not get orders , 2003 .

[17]  Robert Johnston,et al.  E‐service: enhancing internal customer service through e‐procurement , 2003 .

[18]  Christine Oliver,et al.  The Collective Strategy Framework: An Application to Competing Predictions of Isomorphism , 1988 .

[19]  Lambros Laios,et al.  The influence of product complexity on the purchasing structure , 1995 .

[20]  Charles H. Schwepker,et al.  Ethical climate's relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce , 2001 .

[21]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[22]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  S. H. Appelbaum,et al.  The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behaviour , 2005 .

[24]  Katarina Arbin,et al.  The structure of determinants of individual adoption and use of e-ordering systems , 2008 .

[25]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  Norms that distinguish between marketing and manufacturing , 1994 .

[26]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  If someone is watching, I'll do what I'm asked: mandatoriness, control, and information security , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Bernd Marcus,et al.  Antecedents of counterproductive behavior at work: a general perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  Lawrence A. Tomassini.  Behavioral research on human resource accounting: A contingency framework , 1976 .

[29]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  The Effect of Just-in-Time Selling on Organizational Structure: An Empirical Investigation , 1994 .

[30]  Chris J. Backhouse,et al.  Realigning organisational variables to support workplace behaviour , 2000 .

[31]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets , 1995 .

[32]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[33]  Y. Vardi,et al.  Misbehavior in Organizations: A Motivational Framework , 1996 .

[34]  Thomas E. Becker.  Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research: A Qualitative Analysis With Recommendations , 2005 .

[35]  B. Husted.  Agency, Information, and the Structure of Moral Problems in Business , 2007 .

[36]  Yoav Vardi,et al.  The Effects of Organizational and Ethical Climates on Misconduct at Work , 2001 .

[37]  Michael H. Morris,et al.  Assessing the Structure of Industrial Buying Centers with Multivariate Tools , 1999 .

[38]  D. Kehoe,et al.  The development and evaluation of Internet-based supply of non-production (MRO) items , 2003 .

[39]  D. Vidaver-Cohen.  Moral Climate in Business Firms: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis and Change , 1998 .

[40]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  The Contingency Approach: Its Foundations and Relevance to Theory Building and Research in Marketing , 1988 .

[41]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Risk Handling Strategies in Industrial Vendor Selection Decisions , 1985 .

[42]  David van Rest,et al.  Loyalty as a component of the industrial buying decision , 1973 .

[43]  J. Shepard,et al.  Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence , 1994 .

[44]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Understanding behavioral sources of process variation following enterprise system deployment , 2008 .

[45]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[46]  Chris Lonsdale,et al.  The internal client relationship, demand management and value for money: A conceptual model , 2005 .

[47]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Coping With Systems Risk: Security Planning Models for Management Decision Making , 1998, MIS Q..

[48]  John M. Jermier.  Labor process control in modern organizations: Subtle effects of structure , 1983 .

[49]  Sicco Santema,et al.  Actor-to-actor dissemination of electronic procurement (EP) adoption : an exploration of influencing factors , 2004 .

[50]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Using Organizational Control Mechanisms to Enhance Procurement Efficiency: How GlaxoSmithKline Improved the Effectiveness of E-Procurement , 2006, Interfaces.

[51]  D. A. Krueger.  The religious nature of practical reason: A way into the debate , 1986 .

[52]  Michael J. Kavanagh,et al.  An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace , 1996 .

[53]  Christine A. Henle.  Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. , 2005 .

[54]  E. Raaij,et al.  Non-Compliant Work Behaviour in Purchasing: An Exploration of Reasons Behind Maverick Buying , 2009 .

[55]  C. Gelderman,et al.  Public procurement and EU tendering directives – explaining non‐compliance , 2006 .

[56]  J. Dickson,et al.  PARTICIPATION AS A MEANS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONTROL , 1981 .

[57]  D. Otley.  The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis , 1980 .

[58]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Performance in principal-agent dyads: the causes and consequences of perceived asymmetry of commitment to the relationship , 1997 .

[59]  Andrew Cox,et al.  Sourcing Indirect Spend: A Survey of Current Internal and External Strategies for Non-Revenue-Generating Goods and Services , 2005 .

[60]  R. Nath,et al.  Business‐to‐business e‐procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation , 2007 .

[61]  L. D. Boer,et al.  A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement , 2002 .

[62]  Johanna Adolphina Badenhorst,et al.  Unethical behaviour in procurement: A perspective on causes and solutions , 1994 .

[63]  A. Hovav,et al.  Does One Size Fit All? Examining the Differential Effects of IS Security Countermeasures , 2009 .