Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient‐echo imaging

The influence of local static magnetic field inhomogeneities on gradient‐echo imaging is discussed and the underlying theoretical aspects are reviewed. A high‐resolution approach is suggested to suppress image distortion and restore signal loss due to spin dephasing. Acquisition of three‐dimensional data sets not only overcomes part of the limitations associated with gradient echoes but also makes it possible to extract local information about the strength or direction of background gradients and relative susceptibility changes between different tissues. Applications of the suggested approach in the human brain for anatomical imaging as well as for extraction of physical and physiological parameters are presented and discussed.

[1]  Jens Frahm,et al.  The Effects of Intravoxel Dephasing and Incomplete Slice Refocusing on Susceptibility Contrast in Gradient-Echo MRI , 1995 .

[2]  Yong Man Ro,et al.  Reduction of susceptibility artifact in gradient‐echo imaging , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Elimination of susceptibility distortions and reduction of diffusion attenuation in NMR microscopy by line‐narrowed 2DFT , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  T. Mosher,et al.  Mapping the static magnetic field using a double-DANTE tagging sequence , 1991 .

[5]  G M Bydder,et al.  The benefits of increasing spatial resolution as a means of reducing artifacts due to field inhomogeneities. , 1988, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  J R Reichenbach,et al.  Commutator filter: A novel technique for the identification of structures producing significant susceptibility inhomogeneities and its application to functional MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Weili Lin,et al.  In vivo validation of the bold mechanism: A review of signal changes in gradient echo functional MRI in the presence of flow , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[8]  M A Moerland,et al.  Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D. , 1992, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[9]  S Li,et al.  A computer simulation of the static magnetic field distribution in the human head , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P Boesiger,et al.  FID-acquired-echos (FAcE): a short echo time imaging method for flow artefact suppression. , 1991, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  E M Haacke,et al.  Reduction of T2* dephasing in gradient field-echo imaging. , 1989, Radiology.

[12]  E M Haacke,et al.  The effects of finite sampling in spin‐echo or field‐echo magnetic resonance imaging , 1987, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  NMR chemical shift imaging in three dimensions. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R T Constable,et al.  Functional MR imaging using gradient‐echo echo‐planar imaging in the presence of large static field inhomogeneities , 1995, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  E. Haacke,et al.  Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: The static dephasing regime , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  T Hackländer,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps with dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted FLASH imaging: normal values and preliminary clinical results. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  J. Frahm,et al.  Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  Paul Wintz,et al.  Digital image processing (2nd ed.) , 1987 .

[20]  S. Posse,et al.  Direct imaging of magnetic field gradients by group spin‐echoselection , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. Frahm,et al.  Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.