Increasing recruitment to randomised trials: a review of randomised controlled trials

BackgroundPoor recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a widespread and important problem. With poor recruitment being such an important issue with respect to the conduct of randomised trials, a systematic review of controlled trials on recruitment methods was undertaken in order to identify strategies that are effective.MethodsWe searched the register of trials in Cochrane library from 1996 to end of 2004. We also searched Web of Science for 2004. Additional trials were identified from personal knowledge. Included studies had to use random allocation and participants had to be allocated to different methods of recruitment to a 'real' randomised trial. Trials that randomised participants to 'mock' trials and trials of recruitment to non-randomised studies (e.g., case control studies) were excluded. Information on the study design, intervention and control, and number of patients recruited was extracted by the 2 authors.ResultsWe identified 14 papers describing 20 different interventions. Effective interventions included: telephone reminders; questionnaire inclusion; monetary incentives; using an 'open' rather than placebo design; and making trial materials culturally sensitive.ConclusionFew trials have been undertaken to test interventions to improve trial recruitment. There is an urgent need for more RCTs of recruitment strategies.

[1]  Steven N. Goodman.  A birthday, an anniversary, and an agenda for Clinical Trials , 2004 .

[2]  I Roberts,et al.  Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  S. Havstad,et al.  A randomized trial of recruitment methods for older African American men in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial , 2004, Clinical trials.

[4]  Jenny Freeman,et al.  Is the future for clinical trials internet-based? A cluster randomized clinical trial , 2005, Clinical trials.

[5]  A. Avenell,et al.  The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention – a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled design , 2004, Clinical trials.

[6]  K. Hagen,et al.  Telephone reminders are effective in recruiting nonresponding patients to randomized controlled trials. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  Jenny Donovan,et al.  Quality improvement report , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Understanding controlled trials: What is a patient preference trial? , 1998, BMJ.

[9]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Differential recruitment in a cluster randomized trial in primary care: the experience of the UK Back pain, Exercise, Active management and Manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study , 2005, Clinical trials.

[10]  R. Prescott,et al.  Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. , 1999, Health technology assessment.

[11]  A. Glass,et al.  Mailing strategies and costs of recruiting heavy smokers in CARET, a large chemoprevention trial. , 1998, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Patient Preferences in Randomised Trials: Threat or Opportunity? , 1996, Journal of health services research & policy.

[13]  D. Kendrick,et al.  Does sending a home safety questionnaire increase recruitment to an injury prevention trial? A randomised controlled trial , 2001, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  A. King,et al.  Using direct mail to recruit hispanic adults into a dietary intervention: An experimental study , 2000, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[15]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  T. Peters,et al.  Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study , 2002 .

[18]  A. Garratt,et al.  The impact of using a partially randomised patient preference design when evaluating alternative managements for heavy menstrual bleeding , 1997, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  T. Peters,et al.  Who can best recruit to randomized trials? Randomized trial comparing surgeons and nurses recruiting patients to a trial of treatments for localized prostate cancer (the ProtecT study). , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  C. Perry,et al.  Effectiveness of monetary incentives for recruiting adolescents to an intervention trial to reduce smoking. , 2000, Preventive medicine.

[21]  D. Torgerson,et al.  What is a patient preference trial , 1998 .

[22]  D. Hunninghake,et al.  Recruitment for controlled clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. , 1997, Controlled clinical trials.

[23]  D. Buller,et al.  Recruitment of Hispanic women to the Women's Health Initiative. the case of Embajadoras in Arizona. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[24]  M. Hakama,et al.  Blinding decreased recruitment in a prevention trial of postmenopausal hormone therapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[25]  J. Bryant,et al.  Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.