Evaluation of two methods for quality improvement in intensive care: Facilitated incident monitoring and retrospective medical chart review*

ObjectiveQuality assurance techniques applied within the healthcare industry have been widely used and are intended to improve patient outcomes. Two methods that have been utilized are incident reporting and medical chart review (MCR). The objectives for this study were to evaluate facilitated incident monitoring (FIM) and MCR in the intensive care setting. DesignCross-sectional comparison of prospective FIM and retrospective MCR. SettingTertiary, 12-bed, closed intensive care unit (ICU) in Australia providing adult and pediatric intensive care to surgical, medical, trauma, and retrieval patients. PatientsPatients present or admitted to the ICU during the 2-month study period. Measurement and Main ResultsDuring the study period, there were 176 admissions involving 164 patients. A total of 100 FIM reports, of which 70 related to care provided by the ICU team, identified 221 incidents. There were 30 FIM reports that described adverse events, of which only one related to ICU team care. Potential of harm was estimated to be minimal in 49% and significant in 51%; 84% of incidents were considered preventable. Important contextual information was provided, including evidence for the importance of system factors. MCR identified 132 adverse events involving 48% of charts, and 47 related to ICU team care. Common adverse events included nosocomial infections, aspiration, neurologic compromise, respiratory arrest, delayed diagnosis, and treatment. Twenty percent of adverse events were considered preventable, and in 41%, there was evidence of system causation. ConclusionFIM provided more contextual information about incidents and identified a larger number and higher proportion of preventable problems than MCR, but FIM identified few iatrogenic infections, problems with pain management, or problems leading to ICU admission. FIM is easily incorporated into the clinical routine. This study suggests that incident monitoring may be more useful for identifying quality problems, and it could be supplemented by selective audits and focused MCR to detect problems not reported well by FIM.

[1]  T. Brennan,et al.  Physician Reporting Compared with Medical-Record Review to Identify Adverse Medical Events , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[2]  L. Andrews,et al.  An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care , 1997, The Lancet.

[3]  T. Brennan,et al.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  T. Buckley,et al.  Improvements in anaesthetic care resulting from a critical incident reporting programme , 1996, Anaesthesia.

[5]  Cynthia Weinmann.  Quality Improvement in Health Care , 1998, Evaluation & the health professions.

[6]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Adverse Incident Reporting in Intensive Care , 1994, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[7]  N M Laird,et al.  Hospital characteristics associated with adverse events and substandard care. , 1991, JAMA.

[8]  T. Buckley,et al.  Critical incident reporting in the intensive care unit , 1997, Anaesthesia.

[9]  U. Beckmann,et al.  The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. An Analysis of the First Year of Reporting , 1996, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[10]  E J Orav,et al.  Negligent care and malpractice claiming behavior in Utah and Colorado. , 2000, Medical care.

[11]  T. Brennan,et al.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. , 2000, Medical care.

[12]  Y. Donchin,et al.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit , 2022 .

[13]  W. J. Russell,et al.  The Australian Incident Monitoring Study: An Analysis of 2000 Incident Reports , 1993, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[14]  W. Runciman,et al.  A classification for adverse drug events. , 1999, Journal of quality in clinical practice.

[15]  J. Baaj,et al.  Critical incident reports. , 1998, Middle East journal of anaesthesiology.

[16]  B. Frey,et al.  Comprehensive critical incident monitoring in a neonatal-pediatric intensive care unit: experience with the system approach , 2000, Intensive Care Medicine.

[17]  W J Russell,et al.  The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Errors, incidents and accidents in anaesthetic practice. , 1993, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[18]  D. Colton.  Quality Improvement in Health Care , 2000, Evaluation & the health professions.

[19]  E. Ackermann.  The Quality in Australian Health Care Study. , 1996, The Medical journal of Australia.

[20]  J. Williamson.  Critical Incident Reporting in Anaesthesia , 1988, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[21]  H R Rubin,et al.  The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[22]  S. Bhagwanjee,et al.  Adverse events in a surgical intensive care unit--a cause of increased mortality. , 1994, South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie.

[23]  U. Beckmann,et al.  The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. the Development and Evaluation of an Incident Reporting System in Intensive Care , 1996, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[24]  R. Gibberd,et al.  An analysis of the causes of adverse events from the Quality in Australian Health Care Study , 1999, The Medical journal of Australia.

[25]  Incidence of adverse events and negligent care in hospitalized patients. , 1990, Transactions of the Association of American Physicians.