Antiandrogenic agents as monotherapy in advanced prostatic carcinoma

Pure antiandrogens have a quality‐of‐life advantage over other androgen ablation methods in the treatment of patients with prostatic cancer because they do not reduce the serum testosterone and therefore do not have a marked inhibitory effect on libido and potency. The long half‐life of two of the three currently studied pure antiandrogens permits once‐a‐day administration, which should enhance patient compliance. With continued administration, there is a gradual rise in serum testosterone, and the clinical impact of this requires additional study using randomized Phase III trials. Proper stratification of patients at entry into such studies with documentation of various prognostic factors will add statistical value and enable physicians to draw better conclusion on the relative efficacy of these agents.

[1]  J. Hanson,et al.  Analysis of prognostic factors in men with metastatic prostate cancer. Uro-Oncology Group of Northern Alberta. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[2]  M. Costantini,et al.  Monotherapy with nilutamide, a pure nonsteroidal antiandrogen, in untreated patients with metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. The Italian Prostatic Cancer Project. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[3]  L. Pendyala,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and metabolismof nilutamide , 1991 .

[4]  D. J. Plessis Castration plus nilutamide vs castration plus placebo in advanced prostate cancer. A review. , 1991 .

[5]  M. Gaillard-Moguilewsky Pharmacology of antiandrogens and value of combining androgen suppression with antiandrogen therapy. , 1991, Urology.

[6]  S. Goldenberg,et al.  Use of cyproterone acetate in prostate cancer. , 1991, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[7]  G. Kennealey,et al.  Use of the nonsteroidal anti-androgen Casodex in advanced prostatic carcinoma. , 1991, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[8]  R. Gittes Carcinoma of the prostate. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  L. Denis,et al.  Clinical profile of a new non-steroidal antiandrogen , 1990, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[10]  O. Yoshida,et al.  Prognostic significance of prostate specific antigen in endocrine treatment for prostatic cancer. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[11]  M. Soloway The Importance of Prognostic Factors in Advanced Prostate Cancer , 1990, Cancer.

[12]  F. Debruyne,et al.  Analysis of prognostic factors in disseminated prostatic cancer. An update , 1990 .

[13]  W. Catalona,et al.  Clinical use of prostate specific antigen in patients with prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[14]  M. Keating,et al.  Long-term experience with flutamide in patients with prostatic carcinoma. , 1989, Urology.

[15]  R. Neri Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of flutamide. , 1989, Urology.

[16]  T. Stamey,et al.  Prostate specific antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. IV. Anti-androgen treated patients. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[17]  M. Soloway,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients with advanced prostate cancer. , 1989, Urology.

[18]  S. Ishikawa,et al.  Prognostic factors in survival free of progression after androgen deprivation therapy for treatment of prostate cancer. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[19]  Edwin Silverberg,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1989 , 1989 .

[20]  F. Rasmussen,et al.  Flutamide versus stilboestrol in the management of advanced prostatic cancer. A controlled prospective study. , 1988, British journal of urology.

[21]  M. Soloway,et al.  Stratification of patients with metastatic prostate cancer based on extent of disease on initial bone scan , 1988, Cancer.

[22]  R L Vessella,et al.  Prostatic specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in the monitoring and staging of patients with prostatic cancer. , 1987, The Journal of urology.

[23]  T. Stamey,et al.  Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Serum Marker for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate , 1987 .

[24]  R. Lundgren Flutamide as primary treatment for metastatic prostatic cancer. , 1987, British journal of urology.

[25]  R. Sylvester,et al.  Comparison of diethylstilbestrol, cyproterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: final analysis of a randomized phase III trial of the European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Urological Group. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[26]  M. Keating,et al.  Ureteroscopy: the initial experience. , 1986, The Journal of urology.

[27]  P. Poyet,et al.  Comparison of the antiandrogenic/androgenic activities of flutamide, cyproterone acetate and megestrol acetate , 1985, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[28]  D. Tolley,et al.  Flutamide therapy for advanced prostatic cancer: a phase II study. , 1985, British journal of urology.

[29]  N. Yang,et al.  Prognostic importance of prostate-specific antigen for monitoring patients with stages B2 to D1 prostate cancer. , 1985, Cancer research.

[30]  F. Labrie,et al.  Complete androgen blockade for the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1985, Important advances in oncology.

[31]  F. Labrie,et al.  The pure antiandrogen ru 23908 (anandron®), a candidate of choice for the combined antihormonal treatment of prostatic cancer: A review , 1984, The Prostate.

[32]  W. Whitmore,et al.  Experience with flutamide in patients with advanced prostatic cancer without prior endocrine therapy , 1984, Cancer.

[33]  S. Loening,et al.  Flutamide in the treatment of metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. , 1981, British journal of urology.

[34]  Stephens Ca,et al.  Urologic aspects of malformations and common abnormalities of the anus and rectum. , 1978 .

[35]  J. Schmidt,et al.  Comparison of flutamide (SCH-13521) and diethylstilbestrol in untreated advanced prostatic cancer. , 1976, Urology.

[36]  R. Neri,et al.  A biological profile of a nonsteroidal antiandrogen, SCH 13521 (4'-nitro-3'trifluoromethylisobutyranilide). , 1972, Endocrinology.